[Bug 10066] drm.ko fails to load on kernels without AGP support

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10066 Ian Romanick changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10066] drm.ko fails to load on kernels without AGP support

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10066 Ian Romanick changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: http://b

[Bug 19601] [[openSUSE 11.0 x86_64] multiple startx does not work

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19601 Michel Dänzer changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dri-|xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Cursor's update inside kernel only

2009-01-16 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Monday, January 5, 2009 12:55 pm Tiago Vignatti wrote: > Right now a thing that is annoying me is how others cursors, sw rendered, > could be implemented. I want to avoid two differents sets of the same code > in different contexts. IMHO conceptually all these cursor update things > must be in-k

Re: [PATCH 3/4] evdev: short-circuit evdev with drm to update cursors in-kernel.

2009-01-16 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Monday, January 5, 2009 1:00 pm Tiago Vignatti wrote: > Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti > --- > drivers/input/evdev.c | 11 +++ > include/linux/drm_cursor.h |3 +++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/linux/drm_cursor.h > > diff --

Re: [PATCH 1/4] DRM: in-kernel cursor update on the top of mode setting.

2009-01-16 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Monday, January 5, 2009 12:58 pm Tiago Vignatti wrote: > + > +int drmCursorSetDev(int fd, char *name) > +{ > +struct drm_mode_cursor_setdev arg; > + > +strncpy(arg.name, name, strlen(name)); > +arg.name[strlen(name)] = '\0'; arg.name is on 32 bytes wide, right? So shouldn't the la

Re: KMS with Xorg on G45 failing

2009-01-16 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tuesday, January 6, 2009 5:41 pm Mike Lothian wrote: > 2009/1/7 Mike Lothian : > > 2009/1/7 Jesse Barnes : > >> On Tuesday, January 6, 2009 3:53 pm Mike Lothian wrote: > >>> 2009/1/6 Jesse Barnes : > >>> > On Tuesday, January 6, 2009 2:35 pm Mike Lothian wrote: > >>> >> Hi there > >>> >> > >>> >

Re: [PATCH] create IDR mutex for mode_config identifier allocation

2009-01-16 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:56 am Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 10:48 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > >From fc3b2a31f1d2274bcf98929d5f3a5aeaee1baf4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > > From: Jesse Barnes > > Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:38:13 -0800 > > Subject: [PATCH] drm: create mode

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] VGA hotplug support for i915 kms

2009-01-16 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Friday, January 16, 2009 5:42 am Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:14 pm Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> Here's a work in progress VGA hotplug patch that I've been testing on my > >> GM45. I've only tested VGA interrupts so far, but other ports may wor

[Bug 19591] intel driver doesn't build against 2.6.28 drm headers

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19591 --- Comment #3 from Jesse Barnes 2009-01-16 09:28:34 PST --- Yeah, applying the page flipping removal is probably the simplest way to solve this. The kernel doesn't support these interfaces anymore anyway, so... -- Configure bugmail: htt

[Bug 19591] intel driver doesn't build against 2.6.28 drm headers

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19591 --- Comment #2 from Timo Aaltonen 2009-01-16 07:16:34 PST --- There's a patch on intel-gfx@ which should fix this by removing the pageflipping support from the driver? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=em

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] VGA hotplug support for i915 kms

2009-01-16 Thread Jakob Bornecrantz
Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:14 pm Jesse Barnes wrote: >> Here's a work in progress VGA hotplug patch that I've been testing on my >> GM45. I've only tested VGA interrupts so far, but other ports may work or >> should be easy to enable. When a hotplug interrupt is receiv

[Bug 19601] [[openSUSE 11.0 x86_64] multiple startx does not work

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19601 --- Comment #6 from qwang13 2009-01-16 03:22:56 PST --- Seems the bug is the same as 17988. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assign

[Bug 19591] intel driver doesn't build against 2.6.28 drm headers

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19591 qwang13 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbar...@virtuousgeek.org, |

[git pull] drm fixes

2009-01-16 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Linus, Please pull the 'drm-next' branch from ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git drm-next This contains some fixes since the kms code got merged, one reported regression, and updates the kms driver to work on a few machines that needed a different object fo

[Bug 19601] [[openSUSE 11.0 x86_64] multiple startx does not work

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19601 --- Comment #5 from Chandra 2009-01-16 00:35:09 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22025) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22025) xorg log file -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --

Re: [git pull] drm

2009-01-16 Thread Brice Goglin
Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 09:04 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> Does the attached patch work? > > If its fixed to compile, it fixes the problem. I don't know if your > making this against some other tree or it was just a typo so I've > attached the fixed version that worked for me

[Bug 19601] [[openSUSE 11.0 x86_64] multiple startx does not work

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19601 --- Comment #4 from Chandra 2009-01-16 00:34:34 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22024) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22024) System, graphics boards information -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/user

[Bug 19601] [[openSUSE 11.0 x86_64] multiple startx does not work

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19601 --- Comment #3 from Chandra 2009-01-16 00:33:43 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22023) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22023) x server & DRI openGL information -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpr

[Bug 19601] [[openSUSE 11.0 x86_64] multiple startx does not work

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19601 --- Comment #2 from Chandra 2009-01-16 00:32:44 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22022) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22022) errors thrown on the console during startup -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.

[Bug 19601] [[openSUSE 11.0 x86_64] multiple startx does not work

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19601 --- Comment #1 from Chandra 2009-01-16 00:32:04 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22021) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22021) configuraiton file for x server -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpref

[Bug 19601] New: [[openSUSE 11.0 x86_64] multiple startx does not work

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19601 Summary: [[openSUSE 11.0 x86_64] multiple startx does not work Product: Mesa Version: 7.2 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Pri