http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
Gordon Jin gordon@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gordon@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
Sheridan Hutchinson sheri...@shezza.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 11:48 ---
Right I just need to find some time to work on bugs... I have a few more
theories to test now at least, and hw.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 08:13 ---
I've just had an email from someone who has reproduced this on a thinkpad x30.
My understanding is that Jesse has confirmed this and has access to x40
hardware now.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-22 14:43 ---
I'm afraid not.
Would it be helpful if I could find other people experiencing this? I know of a
few X40 owners I might convince to test this too.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-22 15:22 ---
Yeah it would be good to get some confirmation, but istr seeing another,
similar report for another thinkpad but I don't remember the details. I wonder
if there's some ACPI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-22 15:27 ---
Heh, now I see it was comment #33 that had the other thinkpad report. It
sounds like that's a different suspend/resume problem though, since the sleep
light was still on...
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-21 13:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=16927)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16927action=view)
disable panel restore all panel state first
this one tries to disable
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-21 13:59 ---
Hello; tried that patch against refs/heads/master = b5cddbcc1536 ; I'm afraid
it did not fix it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-21 14:41 ---
And I don't suppose the register diff changes either?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-20 03:28 ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Jon, can you try the drm tree? It's working well on my 855 test machine and
is
easier for me to test/generate diffs against.
Sure. Actually
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-18 18:16 ---
I tried the git tree today on my ThinkPad R61, but the backlight did not come
on. However I also noticed that the suspend LED (the crescent moon) was still
lit as well, so
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 04:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=16860)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16860action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output before suspend; 2.6.26 + jesse's patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 04:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=16861)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16861action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output after suspend; 2.6.26 + jesse's patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-16 16:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=16852)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16852action=view)
Restore LVDS state before PLL state
Can you give something like this a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|10492 |
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-09 03:14 ---
No, all of this should be handled entirely by the drm. The X40 doesn't have
ACPI backlight control.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 08:28 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
If you say that echo mem /sys/power/state works, where is the bug
I realised by comment #10 that my tests had been flawed and in fact echo mem
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 05:28 ---
I am trying marking this bug related or depend on bug 6001 and bug 9642.
Report please consider this patch
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14745
It is a very
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 10:55 ---
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 13:38 ---
Where abouts are the hw quirks in the code? I've skimmed over most of the i915*
files in drivers/char/drm but nothing is jumping out of me. I doubt I'd spot a
bug (nor be able
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-05 03:29 ---
Not on that last run, sorry. I've just redone them. I'll attach but here's the
before/after diff for convenience:
--- regs_before.txt 2008-07-05 11:17:55.0 +0100
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-05 03:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=16744)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16744action=view)
single user; no x; i915 loaded; before suspend
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-05 03:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=16745)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16745action=view)
single user; no x; i915 loaded; after resume
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16633|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 08:15 ---
Is there any difference with X?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 08:38 ---
The backlight still doesn't come on. The intel regs are slightly different,
because X has enabled my external display. I'm going to attach the output of
the reg dumper before
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 08:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=16733)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16733action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output (and other bits) prior to suspend, in X
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 08:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=16734)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16734action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output (and other bits) after suspend, in X
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 10:06 ---
Jon, when you booted into single user you remembered to load i915 right? The
register diffs make it look like the suspend/resume capable i915 driver wasn't
loaded...
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-26 02:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=16633)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16633action=view)
output of intel_reg_dumper
On Matthew Garrett's advice, I booted to single
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-26 04:58 ---
I've just attempted
* echo mem /sys/power/state
* pm-suspend
* pm-suspend --quirk-s3-bios --quirk-s3-mode
with 2.6.25 and 2.6.26-rc8, both in X and without X.
In all
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-26 06:26 ---
BTW, please just add -f to the s2ram's command line and things should work
again.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-26 07:25 ---
Actually, it's adding -f that breaks it. Invoking s2ram on 2.6.26 means it
uses it's built-in whitelist and passes the s3 quirks. This still works for me
(although the quirks
42 matches
Mail list logo
