On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 07:40:40PM +1000, Chris Proctor wrote:
>
> I think these numbers are software rendering. On my machine
> with a Voodoo3 2000 and a dual Pentium Pro 200 I get the following:
>
> DRI:85 fps (monitor rate)
> LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT: 46 fps
> FX_GL
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 08:33:24PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> Those numbers are probably fairly typical, if very poor compared to win32
> numbers. Glide 3 is not exactly fast in Linux unfortunately. As a
> result, 3dfx cards with DRI yield rather disappointing results. Don't
> take that
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 03:19:33PM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> I completely disagree. It sounds like software (indirect) rendering is
> being used, as I get well over 800 frames a second with a V3 and over
> 1600 fps with a V5 (single chip only) on my 1GHz Athlon. Frankly,
> there's stuff in G
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 03:19:33PM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> I completely disagree. It sounds like software (indirect) rendering is
> being used, as I get well over 800 frames a second with a V3 and over
> 1600 fps with a V5 (single chip only) on my 1GHz Athlon. Frankly,
> there's stuff in G
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 08:33:24PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
> > Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
> > gears.
> >
> > I get 125.623 frames/s.
> >
> > The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beg
Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> Those numbers are probably fairly typical, if very poor compared to win32
> numbers. Glide 3 is not exactly fast in Linux unfortunately. As a
> result, 3dfx cards with DRI yield rather disappointing results. Don't
> take that as a sign to go out and upgrade just yet th
Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
>
> Ok
>
> Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
> gears.
>
> I get 125.623 frames/s.
>
> The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
> The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram.
> gears was startet under KDE2.1
Don't use
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
> Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
> gears.
>
> I get 125.623 frames/s.
>
> The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
> The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram.
> gears was
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
> Ok
>
> Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
> gears.
>
> I get 125.623 frames/s.
>
> The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
> The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram.
> ge
Ok
Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
gears.
I get 125.623 frames/s.
The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram.
gears was startet under KDE2.1
Is the benchmark value good or bad?
In other words, did
10 matches
Mail list logo
