On Sam, 2002-10-26 at 01:03, David Dawes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 01:15:15PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >On Don, 2002-10-24 at 14:25, David Dawes wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:00:48PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> >On Don, 2002-10-24 at 13:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >> >> O
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 01:15:15PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>On Don, 2002-10-24 at 14:25, David Dawes wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:00:48PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> >On Don, 2002-10-24 at 13:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:47:01PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wro
On Don, 2002-10-24 at 14:25, David Dawes wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:00:48PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >On Don, 2002-10-24 at 13:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:47:01PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> > > That certainly shouldn't be needed for shared entities
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:00:48PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>On Don, 2002-10-24 at 13:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:47:01PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> > > That certainly shouldn't be needed for shared entities. Where exactly
>> > > was it crashing ?
>> >
>> > XAA d
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:00:48PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Don, 2002-10-24 at 13:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:47:01PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > That certainly shouldn't be needed for shared entities. Where exactly
> > > > was it crashing ?
> > >
> > >
On Don, 2002-10-24 at 13:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:47:01PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > That certainly shouldn't be needed for shared entities. Where exactly
> > > was it crashing ?
> >
> > XAA dereferences pScrn->pScreen to track the state of shared entities.
> >
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:47:01PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > That certainly shouldn't be needed for shared entities. Where exactly
> > was it crashing ?
>
> XAA dereferences pScrn->pScreen to track the state of shared entities.
> RADEONScreenInit() calls other radeon driver functions which c
On Mit, 2002-10-23 at 15:08, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:59:21PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mit, 2002-10-23 at 01:37, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm committing the final part of the merge now. I have build tested
> > > it and it does build fine, although I've
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:08:13PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:59:21PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mit, 2002-10-23 at 01:37, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm committing the final part of the merge now. I have build tested
> > > it and it does build fine, a
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:59:21PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2002-10-23 at 01:37, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > I'm committing the final part of the merge now. I have build tested
> > it and it does build fine, although I've not tested the drivers.
> >
> > The radeon was indeed the mo
On Mit, 2002-10-23 at 01:37, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> I'm committing the final part of the merge now. I have build tested
> it and it does build fine, although I've not tested the drivers.
>
> The radeon was indeed the most difficult in this merge due to
> the divergence of the Clone modes in th
O.k.
I'm committing the final part of the merge now. I have build tested
it and it does build fine, although I've not tested the drivers.
The radeon was indeed the most difficult in this merge due to
the divergence of the Clone modes in the XFree86 CVS etc. Kevin, is
going to take a closer look a
It will most likely take another hour or two to upload, but I'm
committing the initial merge now.
-- Gareth
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
