On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 11:04:47PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
This is a reasonable proposition -- let's start putting a draft together,
then.
---
SF admins,
We're concerned about the recent changes to
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:06:05PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
I'm going to follow Alan suggestion and setup a rsync mirror of the CVS
trunk checkout on my machine at the Uni. I just don't know wether I'll
do the update from a cronjob (if so how frequent?), or if trigered by
the commits (e.g.,
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-15] José Fonseca wrote:
Half done. For everybody eager to get the latest DRI trunk do something
like:
rsync -avz --delete rsync://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/dri/ HEAD/
Thanks. CVS was getting to be useless.
Linus
Mesa3d seems to be affected, too.
No mesa CVS update for 10 days, now ;-(
My DRI CVS is 12 days old...
No chance from old Europe anymore?
Greetings,
Dieter
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 20:24 schrieb José Fonseca:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
I've never tried but isn't possible for non-developers
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
But we really need to get a solution around the backup CVS server as it
really damages the beneficial intervention of non-commiters can have
since they are days behind what the commiters
Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:44, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
But we really need to get a solution around the backup CVS server as it
really damages the beneficial intervention of non-commiters can have
since they are days behind
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 22:31 schrieb Martin Spott:
Jos? Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If not then the solution would imply moving the CVS repository to a new
machine, but where would that be? XFree86.org? Some SF look-a-like?
As far as I know BerliOS is hosting quite a few OpenSource
--- Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM
what about https://savannah.nongnu.org/
Alex
--- Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jos? Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If not then the solution would imply moving the CVS repository to a
new
machine, but where would that be? XFree86.org? Some SF look-a-like?
As far as I know
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
[...]
If not then the solution would
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
[...]
If not then
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:44:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
I mentioned XFree86.org because (supposedly) it has the bandwith and
machine resources to host the DRI repository, and obviously XFree86 and
DRI are two very close entities. That
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:19:33PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:44:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
I wonder if it's really such a pressing problem though.
Imagine you're working with somebody testing some code, but that person
has no CVS write access. After you
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
Regards,
Dieter
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
I've never tried but isn't possible for non-developers also access the
SF CVS repository via SSH (read-only, of
Am Montag, 23. Juni 2003 20:24 schrieb José Fonseca:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
I've never tried but isn't possible for non-developers
Jos? Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If not then the solution would imply moving the CVS repository to a new
machine, but where would that be? XFree86.org? Some SF look-a-like?
As far as I know BerliOS is hosting quite a few OpenSource projects. This is
intended to be some SF alternative. I
18 matches
Mail list logo
