Re: [Dri-devel] Updates to texmem-0-0-1 branch

2002-11-16 Thread Keith Whitwell
Ian Molton wrote: On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:39:55 +0100 (CET) Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im awaiting a PCI Voodoo3 at the moment... Sorry, I didn't make it this week. It will get shipped on monday, No rush - I wasnt criticising, just making the statement so people would know I

Re: [Dri-devel] Updates to texmem-0-0-1 branch

2002-11-15 Thread Ian Molton
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:44:18 -0800 Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Over the next week or so I plan to do the same thing with the r128, i810, and i830 drivers. That will leave the gamma, sis, and tdfx drivers. If those don't get modified to use the new texmem interface, I won't lose

Re: [Dri-devel] Updates to texmem-0-0-1 branch

2002-11-15 Thread Martin Spott
Im awaiting a PCI Voodoo3 at the moment... Sorry, I didn't make it this week. It will get shipped on monday, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! --

Re: [Dri-devel] Updates to texmem-0-0-1 branch

2002-11-15 Thread Ian Molton
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:39:55 +0100 (CET) Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im awaiting a PCI Voodoo3 at the moment... Sorry, I didn't make it this week. It will get shipped on monday, No rush - I wasnt criticising, just making the statement so people would know I intend to have a

Re: [Dri-devel] Updates to texmem-0-0-1 branch

2002-11-15 Thread Brian Paul
Ian Romanick wrote: As everyone on dri-patches already knows, I've just commited a TON of changes to the texmem-0-0-1 branch. I modified the R100 R200 drivers to look more alike. I run the following from within the radeon directory to see the differences between the two drivers: for i in

Re: [Dri-devel] Updates to texmem-0-0-1 branch

2002-11-15 Thread Daryll Strauss
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:20:07AM +, Ian Molton wrote: No rush - I wasnt criticising, just making the statement so people would know I intend to have a crack at Voodoo3 support and not drop any code on the floor. I would hope Ian R's texmem stuff doesn't mean dropping the remaining

Re: [Dri-devel] Updates to texmem-0-0-1 branch

2002-11-15 Thread Ian Romanick
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:56:22AM -0800, Daryll Strauss wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:20:07AM +, Ian Molton wrote: No rush - I wasnt criticising, just making the statement so people would know I intend to have a crack at Voodoo3 support and not drop any code on the floor. I

Re: [Dri-devel] Updates to texmem-0-0-1 branch

2002-11-15 Thread Brian Paul
Ian Romanick wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 07:46:22AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: As everyone on dri-patches already knows, I've just commited a TON of changes to the texmem-0-0-1 branch. I modified the R100 R200 drivers to look more alike. I run the following from within

[Dri-devel] Updates to texmem-0-0-1 branch

2002-11-14 Thread Ian Romanick
As everyone on dri-patches already knows, I've just commited a TON of changes to the texmem-0-0-1 branch. I modified the R100 R200 drivers to look more alike. I run the following from within the radeon directory to see the differences between the two drivers: for i in *.[ch] ; do diff -ud