Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-16 Thread Dimitry N. Naldaev
В сообщении от 10 Сентябрь 2003 02:16 Alex Deucher написал: > The 2D driver supports all savage chips, NO :-( I have hotebook with savage MX video subsystem and ysterday I have tried the driver form S3 and it have problems with enlightenment (I am running stable debian) but with fvwm95 it work > b

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-10 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:11:35PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: > Alex Deucher wrote: > >--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>In any case, I would really *NOT* like to see another driver end up > >>like > >>the r100 / r200 driver. The MGA driver, where multiple chips in the > >>same

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-09 Thread Alex Deucher
The r100 and r200 of course. :) Alex --- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Merge which? The r100 & r200 or the 500TX & gamma? I think it would > be > a good idea to merge both, but "merging" the GLINT drivers will be > much > easier (since one of them hasn't been created yet!). H

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-09 Thread Ian Romanick
Alex Deucher wrote: --- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In any case, I would really *NOT* like to see another driver end up like the r100 / r200 driver. The MGA driver, where multiple chips in the same family are supported by the same binary, is a much better model to Is it worth tryin

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-09 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm aware of Sven's work, and I have been in contact with him. I > haven't persued getting docs form 3dlabs yet, but I may do so in the > future. IBM's lawyers are *VERY* picky, so getting docs under NDA > for > use in open-source projects is *VER

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-09 Thread Alex Deucher
The 2D driver supports all savage chips, but the 3D driver seems to only support the Prosavage and Twister (savage4 core) integrated chips: from savage_driver.c: if ((psav->Chipset == S3_TWISTER) || (psav->Chipset == S3_PROSAVAGE)) { /* Setup DRI after visuals have been establi

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-09 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 07:39, Alex Deucher wrote: > and, from the log: > > fxkuehl: I have a Savage/IX (or something similar) in my ThinkPad > T21. > ... > so is the savage4 the same sort of thing as a savage mx/ix? > ... > anholt: I believe so. > > Actually the savage mx/ix chips are based on

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-09 Thread Ian Romanick
Alex Deucher wrote: To do that we're going to "port" the *OLD* 500TX driver to DRI. :) 500tx is a what? anholt: The GLINT before the MX. ... anholt: It should be *much* faster. The Delta does all the geometry setup. This is the mode the current gamma driver uses. hmm Part of this work may

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-09 Thread Alex Deucher
from the log: To do that we're going to "port" the *OLD* 500TX driver to DRI. :) 500tx is a what? anholt: The GLINT before the MX. ... anholt: It should be *much* faster. The Delta does all the geometry setup. This is the mode the current gamma driver uses. hmm Part of this work may lead i