On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2009 11:24:29 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0
2009/5/5 Ian Romanick :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
>>> Ian Romanick wrote:
>>>
Having this ability would allow us to advertise some fbconfigs
On Tue, 05 May 2009 11:24:29 -0700
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
> >> Ian Romanick wrote:
> >>
> >>> Having this ability wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
>> Ian Romanick wrote:
>>
>>> Having this ability would allow us to advertise some fbconfigs with
>>> GLX_SWAP_METHOD_OML = GLX_S
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> > On Mon, 04 May 2009 14:45:07 -0700
>> > Ian Romanick wrote:
>> >
>> >> There's a problem in dri2Swa
On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 May 2009 14:45:07 -0700
> > Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> >> There's a problem in dri2SwapBuffers. If a new libGL is used with
> >> an old driver, psc->d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2009 14:45:07 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
>> There's a problem in dri2SwapBuffers. If a new libGL is used with an
>> old driver, psc->dri2->setBuffers won't be set, right?
>
> Yes. I should probably add an #i
On Mon, 04 May 2009 14:45:07 -0700
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Ok, this set addresses all the shortcomings of the last set, and
> > things seem quite solid, aside from output detection on my test
> > platform which causes me t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Ok, this set addresses all the shortcomings of the last set, and things
> seem quite solid, aside from output detection on my test platform which
> causes me to wait on flips from pipes with no outputs attached. Note
> that this
On Fri, 1 May 2009 14:19:29 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:02:59 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > > flip waits should wait for *both* vbl
On Sat, 2 May 2009 00:02:16 +0100
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:02:59 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> >> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >> > I'm still working through mutlihead iss
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:02:59 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
>> > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank eve
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:02:59 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank events before completing
> > the flip. But other than that, I'm p
On Fri, 1 May 2009 14:13:16 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:39:57PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 May 2009 00:25:54 +0300
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > The completion won't happen until at least 'interval' frames
> > > > have passed since the flip was queued
On Fri, 1 May 2009 04:06:09 +0200
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 30. April 2009 23:25:54 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> > > > Your interval handling seems to be too harsh. In case you wanted
> > > > something that can implement GLX_SGI_swap_control then AFAICS
> > > > the interval should only
Am Donnerstag, 30. April 2009 23:25:54 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> > > Your interval handling seems to be too harsh. In case you wanted
> > > something that can implement GLX_SGI_swap_control then AFAICS the
> > > interval should only specify the minimum number of frames that must
> > > pass between t
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:39:57PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 1 May 2009 00:25:54 +0300
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > The completion won't happen until at least 'interval' frames have
> > > passed since the flip was queued, so I think the semantics match?
> >
> > Well I guess it satisfie
On Fri, 1 May 2009 00:25:54 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > The completion won't happen until at least 'interval' frames have
> > passed since the flip was queued, so I think the semantics match?
>
> Well I guess it satisfies the requirement that flips will never happen
> less than interval frames
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:49:12AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:36:55 +0300
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:02:59PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > I'm still working through mutli
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:48:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 08:39 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:08:36 +0200
> > Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > > > Je
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:36:55 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:02:59PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > > flip waits should wait for *both*
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 08:39 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:08:36 +0200
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:08:36 +0200
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:02:59PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank events before completing the
> > flip. But other than that,
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank events before completing the
> > flip. But other than that, I'm pre
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> flip waits should wait for *both* vblank events before completing the
> flip. But other than that, I'm pretty happy with things.
This incremental set fixes up the multihe
Here's an updated patchset for the DRI2 swapbuffers code. There are
still some outstanding issues, but I made some changes to the
interfaces and refreshed the patches against more recent X server and
Mesa bits.
The main open issue at this point is how to handle getting the new
buffers. The curre
Again, in the interest of getting a non-broken (i.e. non-tearing) GL stack
w/DRI2 I've been working on making SwapBuffers use page flipping for full
screen clients (like compositing managers). This saves a full screen blit so
should be a little faster than the current code. There's a big downs
28 matches
Mail list logo
