Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-21 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:05:27PM -0500, Daniel Vogel wrote: > > There is no way in hell UT2k3 will run on MGA. It *REQUIRES* > > ARB_texture_env_combine, which is not supported by that hardware. Even > > if it didn't require that extension, good grief man, why torture > > yourself like that?!?

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-21 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:33:56PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > Philip Armstrong wrote: > >phil@trigger /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo >./ut2003_demo > >Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". > Ignore this. This is UT2k3 trying to determine which way to do > full

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Daniel Vogel
> There is no way in hell UT2k3 will run on MGA. It *REQUIRES* > ARB_texture_env_combine, which is not supported by that hardware. Even > if it didn't require that extension, good grief man, why torture > yourself like that?!? :) FWIW, the Windows version of UT2003 even runs (badly) on Intel 810

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Ian Romanick
Leif Delgass wrote: Based on the MESA_DEBUG log, It looks like ARB_texture_env_combine isn't supported in the MGA driver. I see defines for what look like combiner registers, but it's not implemented in the driver yet (I don't have hardware docs myself so I don't know the specifics of what the c

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Ian Romanick
Philip Armstrong wrote: phil@trigger /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo >./ut2003_demo Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". Ignore this. This is UT2k3 trying to determine which way to do fullscreen. Either the XFree86 way or the XiG way. [ 4] /usr/X11R6/lib/mo

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Daniel Vogel
> Based on the MESA_DEBUG log, It looks like ARB_texture_env_combine isn't > supported in the MGA driver. I see defines for what look like combiner That's a no go as we rely on this extension. The game should probably assert in this case. -- Daniel, Epic Games Inc. ---

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Daniel Vogel wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 06:13:01PM -0500, Daniel Vogel wrote: > > > > [ 6] /usr/X11R6/lib/modules-dri-trunk/dri/mga_dri.so [0x43f31fb7] > > > > [ 7] /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo/System/OpenGLDrv.so(DrawPrimitive__ > > > > 22FOpenGLRenderInterface14EPrimitiveType+0x373) > > Might be interesting t

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:53:25PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Armstrong
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:25:16PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which > > is purported to n

RE: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Daniel Vogel
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which > > > is purported to not need

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v220

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which > > is purported to not need S3TC extensi

Re: [Dri-devel] UT2003 crash with current trunk

2003-02-20 Thread Philip Brown
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote: > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which > is purported to not need S3TC extensions), I get the following > traceback reported by