Gareth Hughes wrote:
>
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > Gareth Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>That's probably more of a rasterization/fill test than a T&L test, so
> >>it's not surprising there isn't a more significant increase.
> >>
> >
> > What tests do you recommend?
>
> Pretty much
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Gareth Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>That's probably more of a rasterization/fill test than a T&L test, so
>>it's not surprising there isn't a more significant increase.
>>
>
> What tests do you recommend?
Pretty much all of the Mesa/GLUT demos are pointless
Gareth Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> >
> > glxgears at 1600x1200x24 improved from 804 to 824fps.
>
> That's probably more of a rasterization/fill test than a T&L test, so
> it's not surprising there isn't a more significant increase.
What tests do you recommend
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> glxgears at 1600x1200x24 improved from 804 to 824fps.
That's probably more of a rasterization/fill test than a T&L test, so
it's not surprising there isn't a more significant increase.
-- Gareth
___
Dri-devel mailing lis
