On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 22:28 +, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 22:07 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >
> > > After think a little and put dri working with kernel 2.4.
> > > The only solution, that I see, to not private users of savage with
> > > kernel 2.4, have dri. Is do 2
>
> Ok I accept that, about releaseable and dodgy DRM drive, I agree.
>
> but just a tough, about security, nowadays it common say, errors are
> security problems, I don't see how could drm be insecure.
Well if you have a multi-user machine, and they have access to the
insecure drm, they can write
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 22:07 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > After think a little and put dri working with kernel 2.4.
> > The only solution, that I see, to not private users of savage with
> > kernel 2.4, have dri. Is do 2 directory on Xorg tree, one with the code
> > before 2005-01-01 and other
>
> After think a little and put dri working with kernel 2.4.
> The only solution, that I see, to not private users of savage with
> kernel 2.4, have dri. Is do 2 directory on Xorg tree, one with the code
> before 2005-01-01 and other for kernel 2.6
Not really a good idea, the old code was not re
redirecting to devel ML
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 23:38 +, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> If you're still using Linux 2.4 you need to upgrade that first.
After think a little and put dri working with kernel 2.4.
The only solution, that I see, to not private users of savage with
kernel 2.4, have
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 00:18 +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
> Looks like this was caused by my update of the Savage DDX driver in the
> X.org tree without also upating the Mesa driver in the X.org tree. At
> the moment the Mesa driver in X.org's extras/Mesa can't be compiled with
> the current Savage
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:10:37 +0100, Stephane Marchesin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> >Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of
> >what is happening with it,
> >
> >I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived
> >a
Dave Airlie wrote:
Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of
what is happening with it,
I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived
area but that will stop all support for Linux 2.4,
Are some changes underway that might make 2.4 hard to
Am So, den 02.01.2005 schrieb Sergio Monteiro Basto um 23:18:
> savage_xmesa.c: In function `savageInitDriver':
> savage_xmesa.c:111: error: structure has no member named `frontPitch'
> savage_xmesa.c:113: error: structure has no member named
> `frontBitmapDesc'
> savage_xmesa.c:121: error: structu
savage_xmesa.c: In function `savageInitDriver':
savage_xmesa.c:111: error: structure has no member named `frontPitch'
savage_xmesa.c:113: error: structure has no member named
`frontBitmapDesc'
savage_xmesa.c:121: error: structure has no member named
`backBitmapDesc'
savage_xmesa.c:123: error: struc
Am So, den 02.01.2005 schrieb Sergio Monteiro Basto um 2:42:
> On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 16:02 +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
>
> > I was going to change mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/Makefile.template to use
> > the share-core directory for DRM includes. This will be needed for the
> > new Savage DRM as it
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 16:02 +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
> I was going to change mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/Makefile.template to use
> the share-core directory for DRM includes. This will be needed for the
> new Savage DRM as it lives in linux-core/shared-core only. With your
> assessment of the sta
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:34:52 -0500, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 10:45 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I don't know if an incremental approach would be easier; there's clearly
> a lot of refactoring to do to get to a point where rendering through
> GL is clean. But the i
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 10:45 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> [...] Some kind of
> fbdev/drm merge is a requirement of getting X on GL working.
[ straying off-topic for this list... ]
I would argue that this isn't necessarily true. As soon as you can get
dri
drivers running within the X server, it woul
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:49:50 +0100, Jerome Glisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> I was wondering what is going on with drm & fbdev merging ?
> Still planed ? Is the drm-core is a first move in that direction ?
I have two new babies in the house that were born two months
prema
Am Fr, den 31.12.2004 schrieb Dave Airlie um 7:28:
> Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of
> what is happening with it,
>
> I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived
> area but that will stop all support for Linux 2.4,
>
> but a
Dave Airlie wrote:
Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of
what is happening with it,
I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived
area but that will stop all support for Linux 2.4,
but at the moment I'm getting the impression more peo
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 06:28:24 + (GMT), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay some people have commented on the DRM CVS of late, and are unsure of
> what is happening with it,
>
> I'm very willing to drop the shared and linux directories into an archived
> area but that will stop all
18 matches
Mail list logo
