On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:46 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> tree in the kernel,
>
> a) it lives under char.
> b) everything in one directory.
> c) header files in one directory.
> d) no header files exposed to userspace.
>
On Thu 2008-05-29 10:46:22, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> tree in the kernel,
>
> a) it lives under char.
> b) everything in one directory.
> c) header files in one directory.
> d) no header files exposed to userspace.
>
> htt
On Thursday, May 29, 2008 11:26 pm Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:02 PM, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:46 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> >> tree in the ker
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:02 PM, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:46 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
>> tree in the kernel,
>>
>> a) it lives under char.
>> b) everything in one director
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:46 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> tree in the kernel,
>
> a) it lives under char.
> b) everything in one directory.
> c) header files in one directory.
> d) no header files exposed to userspace.
>
On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:05:08 +0200
"Alexander van Heukelum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 10:46:22 +1000, "Dave Airlie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> > tree in the kernel,
> >
> > a) it lives
On Thu, 29 May 2008 10:46:22 +1000, "Dave Airlie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> tree in the kernel,
>
> a) it lives under char.
> b) everything in one directory.
> c) header files in one directory.
> d) no header files e
On Thursday 2008-05-29 06:23, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:46:22AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
>> tree in the kernel,
>>
>> a) it lives under char.
>> b) everything in one directory.
>> c) header fi
> >
> > Makefie bits:
> > 5 EXTRA_CFLAGS = -Iinclude/drm
> > Use ccflags-y := -Iinclude/drm
> > I assume this is a temporary workaround and you plan to fix
> > up all includes to use "#include "
>
> I'd rather not do that due the fact that a lot of these files are
> shared with other OSes upstrea
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:46:22AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> tree in the kernel,
>
> a) it lives under char.
> b) everything in one directory.
> c) header files in one directory.
> d) no header files exposed to users
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:46:22AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
>> tree in the kernel,
>>
>> a) it lives under char.
>> b) everything in one dire
11 matches
Mail list logo
