Dave Airlie wrote:
I've done a cut-n-paste job on the r200 client storage stuff and made a
radeon version..
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/patches/dri/radeon_client_storage.diff
It builds I don't have a radeon here I can test it on .. when I get back
into work I'll test it and commit it if no-one ha
Ian Romanick wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
The dri and drm seem fairly straightforward, though I'm not sure the way
I handled communication between especially drm and ddx is how it's meant
to be. dri got a bit unlucky, as ddx can't know at startup if it will be
able to handle color tiling, so ol
Greetings,
I have an Intel i855GM chipset in my laptop, running Xorg 6.8.1 with
i810 and i915_dri for DRI, and kernel 2.6.10 with the i915 kernel
module. DRI is all well and happy, and glxgears achieves about
800fps. I use Software Suspend 2 (2.1.5.11) from
softwaresuspend.berlios.de, and upon sus
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:12:25 +0800, Bernard Blackham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have an Intel i855GM chipset in my laptop, running Xorg 6.8.1 with
> i810 and i915_dri for DRI, and kernel 2.6.10 with the i915 kernel
> module. DRI is all well and happy, and glxgears achieves about
Bernard Blackham wrote:
Greetings,
I have an Intel i855GM chipset in my laptop, running Xorg 6.8.1 with
i810 and i915_dri for DRI, and kernel 2.6.10 with the i915 kernel
module. DRI is all well and happy, and glxgears achieves about
800fps. I use Software Suspend 2 (2.1.5.11) from
softwaresuspend.b
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:12:22PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> There has just been an update to xorg which includes DRI suspend/resume
> support for i915. Hopefully this will be of some help to you.
Thanks. It works perfectly! Needed a couple of patches to get it
happy however:
- my `install
Bernard Blackham wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:12:22PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
There has just been an update to xorg which includes DRI suspend/resume
support for i915. Hopefully this will be of some help to you.
Thanks. It works perfectly! Needed a couple of patches to get it
happy how
>
> The env var still has the R200 prefix, otherwise it seems fine.
> However, is this actually useful? IMHO, this is just dead code which will
> never get used normally. At least I don't know any single app which would use
> the extension - they definitely prefer things like ARB_vertex_array_objec
Hi Alan,
you checked in some changes to the i915 drm but the changelog looks like
you did more did you miss some changes in the checkin?
mainly it says added resume functionality but the patch just changed a
function name added the pci id and bumped the driver version...
Dave.
--
David Ai
Hi,
I've just noticed that Alan has checked some changes into
extras/drm in the Xorg tree, I'm sure these are needed to build the latest
drivers but I'm just wondering how we should approach these things in
future?
When we next import a DRM from the main tree will we have to much about
wi
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:41:59 -0500, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No other device driver is also doing such lowlevel stuff with
> page tables directly afaics. drivers/char/drm seem to be the only drivers
> using [pgd|pmd|pte]_offset() routines.
On 6 Jan 2005 20:38:27 +0100, Andi Kleen <[E
11 matches
Mail list logo
