[Bug 18074] i915_program_error: Exceeded max temporary reg

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18074 Eric Anholt changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dri-|e...@anholt.net |de...@l

Re: [RFC] add timeout to drmWaitVBlank to avoid hangs

2009-01-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to prevent hangs. Since the > server interrupts syscalls pretty frequently with SIGALM, we tend to restart > syscalls when EINTR is returned. That means when a vblank timeout happens, > we pro

[Bug 19400] glxgears and opengl related applications appear blank!

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19400 Sunil Mekathotti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sbmekatho...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Bug 19400] glxgears and opengl related applications appear blank!

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19400 --- Comment #15 from Sunil Mekathotti 2009-01-07 03:17:11 PST --- Created an attachment (id=21742) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=21742) drm kernel logs -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?

Mapping frame buffer

2009-01-07 Thread Paul Winder
I have an application which owns the frame buffer, the code I developed was based off the modesetting-101 branch. And it works v. well. We are migrating to the modesetting-gem branch, and I can't figure out how to map the main frame buffer. In the modesetting-101 version of the code we do som

Re: [RFC] add timeout to drmWaitVBlank to avoid hangs

2009-01-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:49 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to prevent hangs. Since the > > server interrupts syscalls pretty frequently with SIGALM, we tend to restart > > syscalls when EINTR

Re: [RFC] add timeout to drmWaitVBlank to avoid hangs

2009-01-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 9:49 am Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:49 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to pre

Re: [RFC] add timeout to drmWaitVBlank to avoid hangs

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:36 am Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 9:49 am Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:49 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes w

Re: [RFC] add timeout to drmWaitVBlank to avoid hangs

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 9:49 am Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:49 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to prevent hangs. > > > Since the server interrupts syscalls pretty

Re: [RFC] add timeout to drmWaitVBlank to avoid hangs

2009-01-07 Thread Keith Packard
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I remembered you saying we > shouldn't put the retry code there but rather in the individual ioctls that > needed it. We should probably do that separately anyway though if we ever > decide to

Re: [RFC] add timeout to drmWaitVBlank to avoid hangs

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packard wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I remembered you saying we > > shouldn't put the retry code there but rather in the individual ioctls > > that needed it. We should

Re: [RFC] add timeout to drmWaitVBlank to avoid hangs

2009-01-07 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:11 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packard wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I remembered you saying we > > > shouldn't put the retry code there but

Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12381] New: mach64_drm.h missing

2009-01-07 Thread Andrew Morton
Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:30:07 -0800 (PST) From: bugme-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org To: bugme-...@lists.osdl.org Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12381] New: mach64_drm.h missing http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12381 Summary: mach64_drm.h missing

Re: [RFC] add timeout to drmWaitVBlank to avoid hangs

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 11:34 am Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:11 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packard wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I reme

Re: [PATCH] set vblank enabled flag correctly across IRQ install/uninstall

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tuesday, January 6, 2009 10:21 am Jesse Barnes wrote: > In the absence of kernel mode setting, many drivers disable IRQs across VT > switch. The core DRM vblank code is missing a check for this case however; > even after IRQ disable, the vblank code will still have the vblank_enabled > flag set

[Bug 19453] New: [OGLC]oglconform case/pixel-pos fail

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19453 Summary: [OGLC]oglconform case/pixel-pos fail Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: mediu

[Bug 19453] [OGLC]oglconform case/pixel-pos fail

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19453 --- Comment #1 from liuhaien 2009-01-07 18:34:48 PST --- Created an attachment (id=21777) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=21777) xorg conf file -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -

[Bug 19454] New: [OGLC]oglconform case/pxzoom-depth fail

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19454 Summary: [OGLC]oglconform case/pxzoom-depth fail Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: me

[Bug 19454] [OGLC]oglconform case/pxzoom-depth fail

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19454 --- Comment #1 from liuhaien 2009-01-07 18:38:19 PST --- Created an attachment (id=21779) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=21779) xorg conf file -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -

[Bug 19453] [OGLC]oglconform case/pixel-pos fail

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19453 Gordon Jin changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dri-|haihao.xi...@intel.com |d

[Bug 19454] [OGLC]oglconform case/pxzoom-depth fail

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19454 Gordon Jin changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dri-|haihao.xi...@intel.com |d