On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 15:20 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:08 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
Fairly straightforward aside from the aforementioned question about how to
set tiling stride values for a given object.
DDX driver patch?
i830_memory.c: In function
On Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:11 am Steven J Newbury wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 15:20 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:08 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
Fairly straightforward aside from the aforementioned question about how
to set tiling stride values for a given
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 04:52 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
commit 9e44af790f8bf8c3aa8a3101fd4f9bca2e932baa
Author: Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Oct 16 21:18:27 2008 -0700
drm/i915: hold dev-struct_mutex and DRM lock during vblank ring
operations
To synchronize
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 10:54 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Does that still provide good enough latency to prevent tearing though,
e.g. with reduced blanking modes?
It now depends on the scheduler and what else is running on the system.
Yes, this is not ideal, but the sketch of how DRI2 would work
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 18:10 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
I haven't looked into the code for a while, but isn't it possible to use
a spinlock (_bh) for ring protection?
Because we may have to wait for the hardware to drain the ring, it
wouldn't be a good idea to hold a spinlock. In the worst
Keith Packard wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 18:10 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
I haven't looked into the code for a while, but isn't it possible to use
a spinlock (_bh) for ring protection?
Because we may have to wait for the hardware to drain the ring, it
wouldn't be a good
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18191
--- Comment #1 from Chris Coulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 13:23:59 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=19831)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=19831)
Output of lspci -vvnn
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18191
--- Comment #3 from Chris Coulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 13:24:43 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=19833)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=19833)
Xorg.0.log.old
--
Configure bugmail:
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 13:38 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
I guess one could reimplemenet kmap_atomic_pfn() to call this. Sometime.
The goal is to stop needing this function fairly soon and replace it
with a 'real' io-mapping implementation for 32-bit processors.
Given that all
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
Given that all highmem-implementing archtiectures must use the same
declaration here, we might as well put it into include/linux/highmem.h.
Although that goes against current mistakes^Wcode.
Does powerpc32 still implement highmem? It seems that
On Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:42 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
Ok, this one actually works w/o corrupting your display. However, after
running for awhile I end up hitting the BUG_ON at i915_gem.c:1061, so I'm
hoping someone can tell me where I messed up the list handling (the change
in
On Thursday, October 23, 2008 5:09 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:51 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:42 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
Ok, this one actually works w/o corrupting your display. However,
after running for awhile I end up hitting the
On Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:51 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:42 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
Ok, this one actually works w/o corrupting your display. However, after
running for awhile I end up hitting the BUG_ON at i915_gem.c:1061, so I'm
hoping someone can tell me
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 14:24 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The whole point of that function has absolutely nothing to do with
highmem, and it *must* be useful on non-highmem configurations to be
appropriate.
Right, I'd just like my io_mapping_map_atomic_wc to be able to rapidly
map random
I've pulled GIT xf86-video-ati for some months now and I always have
to apply this patch:
diff --git a/src/radeon_video.c b/src/radeon_video.c
index ac60166..c400468 100644
--- a/src/radeon_video.c
+++ b/src/radeon_video.c
@@ -1597,5 +1597,8 @@ skip_theatre:
static XF86VideoAdaptorPtr
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Keith Packard wrote:
So I'd much rather create a new linux/kmap.h or something. Or just
expose this from to asm/fixmap.h or something. Let's not confuse this
with highmem, even if the implementation _historically_ was due to that.
Sure, we readily admit that
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 14:24 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The whole point of that function has absolutely nothing to do with
highmem, and it *must* be useful on non-highmem configurations to be
appropriate.
So I'd much rather create a new linux/kmap.h or something. Or just
expose this
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:48 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Then, there's the issue of 64-bit, and just mapping everything there, and
the interface to that. I liked the trivial extension to struct resource
to have a cached mapping pointer. So if we can just make it pass
resources around and
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:48 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I'm not entirely sure who wants to own up to owning that particular part
of code, and is willing to make kmap_atomic_prot_pfn() also work in the
absense of CONFIG_HIGHMEM.
All of the kmap_atomic functions *do* work without
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 14:24 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I'm not that fan of carrying a mapping with a struct resource because if
we do that we should probably also refcount the mapping, and then there
is the whole question of mappings with different attributes, etc etc...
I'm fine
20 matches
Mail list logo
