http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10592
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-02 17:26 ---
On Fri, 2 May 2008 10:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10592
Summary: [old regression] performance
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10592
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 02:47 ---
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 16:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is old regression. Tested with glxgears i get this results:
v2.6.19 _1413.112_FPS_
v2.6.20
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10628
Summary: 2.6.26-rc1-git1 -- trying to get vblank count for
disabled pipe 0
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.26-rc1-git1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10628
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-08 12:56 ---
The vblank stuff is reverted in Dave's latest DRM update, please re-test.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10681
Summary: No DRM and DRI support for Trident-based chips
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.x
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10681
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-11 15:49 ---
Minimal documentation is available from VIA (included in the PLE133 chipset
docs if you have the right version). You will however have to write the driver
;)
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10681
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-14 13:37 ---
Oh, well. I'm screwed then... ;)
Two questions still haunt me by night, There actually was DRI support in the
2.4.x branch of the kernel? If so, Why it got broken?
Anyway, I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10709
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-15 22:57 ---
In my email from above I mentioned that X behaves strangly and suspend/resume
does not work. The latter seems to be solved with the patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10744
Summary: REGRESSION: video driver stuck after screen blank
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.26-rc
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10709
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 07:09 ---
I confirm that for proper operation I still need the drm-revert patch mentioned
above under patch. Fortunately the other one mentioned in Comment #1 has been
included.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10709
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10628
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10930
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-23 07:22 ---
The bug is still present in 2.6.26-rc7:
[ 1516.201991] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c200105f0ffc
[ 1516.201996] IP: [a046772a]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
Summary: backlight doesn't come on after resume with i915 video
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.26-rc8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-26 02:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=16633)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16633action=view)
output of intel_reg_dumper
On Matthew Garrett's advice, I booted to single
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-26 04:58 ---
I've just attempted
* echo mem /sys/power/state
* pm-suspend
* pm-suspend --quirk-s3-bios --quirk-s3-mode
with 2.6.25 and 2.6.26-rc8, both in X and without X.
In all
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-26 06:26 ---
BTW, please just add -f to the s2ram's command line and things should work
again.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-26 07:25 ---
Actually, it's adding -f that breaks it. Invoking s2ram on 2.6.26 means it
uses it's built-in whitelist and passes the s3 quirks. This still works for me
(although the quirks
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11016
Summary: i945: mplayer -vo gl messes up screen
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.26-rc1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11016
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 11:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=16679)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16679action=view)
don't use tile bits on non-965
Yeah, we don't want to revert the change,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11016
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 12:17 ---
Looks like the 945 doesn't need these register settings -- it uses the fence
registers for detiling instead of explicit configuration. Jbarnes has a patch,
and liskni_s is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11016
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 12:22 ---
works indeed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11016
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 12:38 ---
This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.25. Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16633|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 08:15 ---
Is there any difference with X?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 08:38 ---
The backlight still doesn't come on. The intel regs are slightly different,
because X has enabled my external display. I'm going to attach the output of
the reg dumper before
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 08:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=16733)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16733action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output (and other bits) prior to suspend, in X
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 08:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=16734)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16734action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output (and other bits) after suspend, in X
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 10:06 ---
Jon, when you booted into single user you remembered to load i915 right? The
register diffs make it look like the suspend/resume capable i915 driver wasn't
loaded...
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-05 03:29 ---
Not on that last run, sorry. I've just redone them. I'll attach but here's the
before/after diff for convenience:
--- regs_before.txt 2008-07-05 11:17:55.0 +0100
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-05 03:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=16744)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16744action=view)
single user; no x; i915 loaded; before suspend
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-05 03:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=16745)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16745action=view)
single user; no x; i915 loaded; after resume
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 10:55 ---
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 13:38 ---
Where abouts are the hw quirks in the code? I've skimmed over most of the i915*
files in drivers/char/drm but nothing is jumping out of me. I doubt I'd spot a
bug (nor be able
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 05:28 ---
I am trying marking this bug related or depend on bug 6001 and bug 9642.
Report please consider this patch
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14745
It is a very
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 08:28 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
If you say that echo mem /sys/power/state works, where is the bug
I realised by comment #10 that my tests had been flawed and in fact echo mem
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-09 03:14 ---
No, all of this should be handled entirely by the drm. The X40 doesn't have
ACPI backlight control.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|10492 |
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-16 16:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=16852)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16852action=view)
Restore LVDS state before PLL state
Can you give something like this a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 04:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=16860)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16860action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output before suspend; 2.6.26 + jesse's patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 04:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=16861)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16861action=view)
intel_reg_dumper output after suspend; 2.6.26 + jesse's patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-18 18:16 ---
I tried the git tree today on my ThinkPad R61, but the backlight did not come
on. However I also noticed that the suspend LED (the crescent moon) was still
lit as well, so
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-20 03:28 ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Jon, can you try the drm tree? It's working well on my 855 test machine and
is
easier for me to test/generate diffs against.
Sure. Actually
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-21 13:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=16927)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16927action=view)
disable panel restore all panel state first
this one tries to disable
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-21 13:59 ---
Hello; tried that patch against refs/heads/master = b5cddbcc1536 ; I'm afraid
it did not fix it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-21 14:41 ---
And I don't suppose the register diff changes either?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-22 14:43 ---
I'm afraid not.
Would it be helpful if I could find other people experiencing this? I know of a
few X40 owners I might convince to test this too.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-22 15:22 ---
Yeah it would be good to get some confirmation, but istr seeing another,
similar report for another thinkpad but I don't remember the details. I wonder
if there's some ACPI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10985
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-22 15:27 ---
Heh, now I see it was comment #33 that had the other thinkpad report. It
sounds like that's a different suspend/resume problem though, since the sleep
light was still on...
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11291
Summary: 2.6.27-rc2: laptop freezes as soon as starting video
playback
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.27-rc2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11291
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||11167
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11291
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-09 13:33 ---
Can you narrow it down to a specific mplayer output option? E.g. does it
happen with mplayer -vo xv or mplayer -vo x11 or some other option?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11291
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-10 10:48 ---
Jesse,
I am sorry, I cannot reproduce it. I tried with x11, xv, gl, gl2 and all worked
ok. I do not know what can have happened, but I am sure that it happened three
times in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11291
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11291
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
Summary: Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.27-rc5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-30 14:45 ---
Handled-By : Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-30 14:44 ---
Not-Handled-By : Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-31 04:52 ---
On Sunday, 31 of August 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 30 August 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-07 14:54 ---
On Sunday, 7 of September 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 06 September 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10289
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10681
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|11167 |
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6893
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4897
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7847
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 02:37 ---
Just to let you know. I am now on 2.6.27-rc6, xserver-core 1.4.2, xorg 7.3, and
the problem is still there.
I needed to install some openGL apps (I did not use any before
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 04:20 ---
Michael, did you ever try turning off AGP? Wrong AGPMode setting, or AGP at
all, is known to cause system freezes. Add this to your Device section:
Option BusType PCI
If that
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 04:50 ---
Tormod, well, I am pretty sure that I have tried many xorg options when I first
reported the bug (two years ago) including different AGPmodes, but I will try
BusType PCI again.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 06:11 ---
Hmm, one question: Is AGP only used in opengl apps? I guess not. It rather
seems to be the basic hardware communication protocol, isn't it?
Because, without opengl I don't
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 06:36 ---
Using option PCI often help in lockup case, AGP is wacky.
And having freeze only with gl apps doesn't rule out this
option.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 06:27 ---
AFAIK, the DRI is the only component that uses AGP transfers with the ATI
cards. If you don't enable DRI, AGP is not used, only basic PCI over the AGP
slot.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 07:20 ---
PCI vs. AGP only affects the GART setup for GPU access to buffers in system
memory (command buffers, vertex buffers, etc.). AGP tends to be problematic.
The radeon PCI GART
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
Summary: [Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP] DRI fail on recent kernel
updates
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.27-git9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-21 04:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=18391)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18391action=view)
dmesg
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-21 04:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=18392)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18392action=view)
X.0.log that works(i.e, DRI disabled)
This is the X log when DRI is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-21 07:51 ---
You should be able to see previous X logs in /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old or
something like that.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-21 21:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=18396)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18396action=view)
X log when dri enabled
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-24 20:34 ---
This problem can be fixed by simply revert:
commit edc6f389f6ae9cb7621270a8ddbb1892bd8df125
radeon: fix PCI bus mastering support enables.
As Alex is the author of the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-27 10:21 ---
there was an error in the logic. should be be fixed by these commits:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/commit/?id=848f00d77381d8b442c096476302796f8fe122fa
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-27 10:29 ---
What exactly do they apply to?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-27 11:10 ---
they are against the upstream drm git tree, but should apply pretty trivially
to the kernel as well.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11868
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11938
Summary: Switch to VESA mode hangs on HD4850
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.27.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11938
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11938
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-02 11:21 ---
Yes, I am quite surprised at this behaviour myself. By now I would agree this
could be some obscure hardware problem that does not manifest istelf under XP.
Still, with 2.6.19
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
301 - 400 of 785 matches
Mail list logo
