On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2009 11:24:29 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0
2009/5/5 Ian Romanick :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
>>> Ian Romanick wrote:
>>>
Having this ability would allow us to advertise some fbconfigs
On Tue, 05 May 2009 11:24:29 -0700
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
> >> Ian Romanick wrote:
> >>
> >>> Having this ability wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
>> Ian Romanick wrote:
>>
>>> Having this ability would allow us to advertise some fbconfigs with
>>> GLX_SWAP_METHOD_OML = GLX_S
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> > On Mon, 04 May 2009 14:45:07 -0700
>> > Ian Romanick wrote:
>> >
>> >> There's a problem in dri2Swa
On Mon, 04 May 2009 19:14:29 -0700
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 May 2009 14:45:07 -0700
> > Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> >> There's a problem in dri2SwapBuffers. If a new libGL is used with
> >> an old driver, psc->d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2009 14:45:07 -0700
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
>> There's a problem in dri2SwapBuffers. If a new libGL is used with an
>> old driver, psc->dri2->setBuffers won't be set, right?
>
> Yes. I should probably add an #i
On Mon, 04 May 2009 14:45:07 -0700
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Ok, this set addresses all the shortcomings of the last set, and
> > things seem quite solid, aside from output detection on my test
> > platform which causes me t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Ok, this set addresses all the shortcomings of the last set, and things
> seem quite solid, aside from output detection on my test platform which
> causes me to wait on flips from pipes with no outputs attached. Note
> that this
On Fri, 1 May 2009 14:19:29 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:02:59 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > > flip waits should wait for *both* vbl
On Sat, 2 May 2009 00:02:16 +0100
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:02:59 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> >> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >> > I'm still working through mutlihead iss
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:02:59 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
>> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
>> > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank eve
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:02:59 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank events before completing
> > the flip. But other than that, I'm p
On Fri, 1 May 2009 14:13:16 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:39:57PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 May 2009 00:25:54 +0300
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > The completion won't happen until at least 'interval' frames
> > > > have passed since the flip was queued
On Fri, 1 May 2009 04:06:09 +0200
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 30. April 2009 23:25:54 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> > > > Your interval handling seems to be too harsh. In case you wanted
> > > > something that can implement GLX_SGI_swap_control then AFAICS
> > > > the interval should only
Am Donnerstag, 30. April 2009 23:25:54 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> > > Your interval handling seems to be too harsh. In case you wanted
> > > something that can implement GLX_SGI_swap_control then AFAICS the
> > > interval should only specify the minimum number of frames that must
> > > pass between t
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:39:57PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 1 May 2009 00:25:54 +0300
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > The completion won't happen until at least 'interval' frames have
> > > passed since the flip was queued, so I think the semantics match?
> >
> > Well I guess it satisfie
On Fri, 1 May 2009 00:25:54 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > The completion won't happen until at least 'interval' frames have
> > passed since the flip was queued, so I think the semantics match?
>
> Well I guess it satisfies the requirement that flips will never happen
> less than interval frames
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:49:12AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:36:55 +0300
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:02:59PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > I'm still working through mutli
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:48:08 +0200
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 08:39 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:08:36 +0200
> > Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > > > Je
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:36:55 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:02:59PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > > flip waits should wait for *both*
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 08:39 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:08:36 +0200
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:08:36 +0200
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:02:59PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank events before completing the
> > flip. But other than that,
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> > flip waits should wait for *both* vblank events before completing the
> > flip. But other than that, I'm pre
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:09:33 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> I'm still working through mutlihead issues on the kernel side; the
> flip waits should wait for *both* vblank events before completing the
> flip. But other than that, I'm pretty happy with things.
This incremental set fixes up the multihe
26 matches
Mail list logo
