Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
If there are no objections, I'll commit this in a few days.
Wouldn't it be simpler to just change t_src to always apply
src-NegateBase? I can't see a need for that src-NegateBase ?
VSF_FLAG_ALL : VSF_FLAG_NONE, as the mesa parser sets all 4 bits anyway
when normal
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Roland Scheidegger [2006-05-30 22:33]:
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
adds that.
Question: is it
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Roland Scheidegger [2006-05-30 22:33]:
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
adds that.
Question: is
Hi,
I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
adds that.
Question: is it okay to assume that NegateBase in
struct prog_src_register will always be filled the
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Hi,
I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
adds that.
Question: is it okay to assume that NegateBase in
struct
Roland Scheidegger [2006-05-30 22:33]:
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
I finally ran glean today, and noticed that SWZ wasn't implemented
properly for r300 ARB vertex programs.
So far I didn't handle per-component negation flags, the attached patch
adds that.
Question: is it okay to
