Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > is this: Hmm. I suspect that difference should have gone away with commit 92971021c6328 (Revert "drm: Don't try and disable an encoder that was never enabled"), but

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap > wrote: > > > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > > is this: > > Hmm. I suspect that difference should have gone away with commit > 92971021c6328

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread François Valenduc
Le 29/12/10 21:16, Jesse Barnes a écrit : > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap >> wrote: >>> >>> The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log >>> is this: >> >> Hmm. I suspect that difference

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:16, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Chris - why did that lvds_ssc_freq thing suddenly start mattering? Can >> we please just disable spread-spectrum entirely? Or perhaps only if we >> notice that it was enabled already

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 22:11:09 +0100 Alex Riesen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:16, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> Chris - why did that lvds_ssc_freq thing suddenly start mattering? Can > >> we please just disable spread-spectrum ent

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
> > Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. > > Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related > to panel power or backlight control. Have you tried bisecting for the > problem between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36? Nevermind, I just checked out the bug, looks like it is

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:18, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> > +               if (IS_GEN5(dev) || IS_GEN6(dev)) >> > +                       dev_priv->lvds_use_ssc = 0; >> >> Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. > > Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related >

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:16:01 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap > > wrote: > > > > > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > > > is this: > > > > Hmm.

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios > > index 2b20786..d27d016 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > @@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ parse_general_features(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv,

[Bug 24462] r600: spread spectrum: flickering screen (bisected)

2010-12-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24462 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Resolution|PATCH_ALRE

2.6.37-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.36

2010-12-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.36, please let us know either and we'll add th

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:53, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> > Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. >> >> Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related >> to panel power or backlight control.  Have you tried bisecting for the >> problem between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36? >

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:09:56 +0100 Alex Riesen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:53, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> > Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. > >> > >> Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related > >> to panel power or backlight control.  Have y

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:13, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> After closing and opening the lid (displays backlight is back) >> >>   http://vin-soft.org/~raa/public/test/intel_gpu_dump-after-lid > > I need the intel_reg_dumper output, not intel_gpu_dump. :) > Hmm, there is no intel_reg_dumper in intel-gp

2.6.37-rc8: Reported regressions 2.6.35 -> 2.6.36

2010-12-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
[NOTE: This most likely is the last summary report of regressions introduced between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36.] This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed a

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:20, Alex Riesen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:13, Jesse Barnes wrote: >>> After closing and opening the lid (displays backlight is back) >>> >>>   http://vin-soft.org/~raa/public/test/intel_gpu_dump-after-lid >> >> I need the intel_reg_dumper output, not intel_gpu

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:46:14 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios > > > index 2b20786..d27d016 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > > @@ -263,6 +263,

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:35:15 +0100 Alex Riesen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:20, Alex Riesen wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:13, Jesse Barnes > > wrote: > >>> After closing and opening the lid (displays backlight is back) > >>> > >>>   http://vin-soft.org/~raa/public/test/intel_gpu

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:02, Jesse Barnes wrote: > That's the easiest way; I think there are existing packages available > as well, but you may have to check Karmic or newer. Never mind. I'm lazy (that's not to say someone is too). I redid the test: Before running "xset dpms force standby":

[Bug 32733] New: arbocclude2 from mesa-demos segfaults

2010-12-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32733 Summary: arbocclude2 from mesa-demos segfaults Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: med

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jeff Chua
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote: Randy, Jeff and Alex, does the below help at all? If so, it may be the minimal fix we want for 2.6.37. Jesse, Yes, that worked for me. I improved on the patch a bit below. Thanks, Jeff --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c 2010-12

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
ream Size: 119862 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20101229/aa03d8b7/attachment-0001.obj>

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > is this: Hmm. I suspect that difference should have gone away with commit 92971021c6328 (Revert "drm: Don't try and disable an encoder that was never enabled"), bu

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap > wrote: > > > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > > is this: > > Hmm. I suspect that difference should have gone away with commit > 92971021c6328

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread François Valenduc
Le 29/12/10 21:16, Jesse Barnes a ?crit : > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap >> wrote: >>> >>> The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log >>> is this: >> >> Hmm. I suspect that difference

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:16, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Chris - why did that lvds_ssc_freq thing suddenly start mattering? Can >> we please just disable spread-spectrum entirely? Or perhaps only if we >> notice that it was enabled already

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 22:11:09 +0100 Alex Riesen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:16, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> Chris - why did that lvds_ssc_freq thing suddenly start mattering? Can > >> we please just disable spread-spectrum

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
> > Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. > > Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related > to panel power or backlight control. Have you tried bisecting for the > problem between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36? Nevermind, I just checked out the bug, looks like it is

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Alex Riesen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:18, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (IS_GEN5(dev) || IS_GEN6(dev)) >> > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_priv->lvds_use_ssc = 0; >> >> Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. > > Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related >

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:16:01 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800 > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap > > wrote: > > > > > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > > > is this: > > > > Hmm.

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios > > index 2b20786..d27d016 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > @@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ parse_general_features(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv,

[Bug 24462] r600: spread spectrum: flickering screen (bisected)

2010-12-29 Thread bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24462 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Resolution|PATCH_ALRE

2.6.37-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.36

2010-12-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.36, please let us know either and we'll add th

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:09:56 +0100 Alex Riesen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:53, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > >> > Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. > >> > >> Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related > >> to panel power or backlight control. ?Hav

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:46:14 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios > > > index 2b20786..d27d016 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > > > @@ -263,6 +263,

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-29 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:35:15 +0100 Alex Riesen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:20, Alex Riesen wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:13, Jesse Barnes > > wrote: > >>> After closing and opening the lid (displays backlight is back) > >>> > >>> ? http://vin-soft.org/~raa/public/test/intel_gpu

[Bug 32733] New: arbocclude2 from mesa-demos segfaults

2010-12-29 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32733 Summary: arbocclude2 from mesa-demos segfaults Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: med