On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 08:50 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
The second case with no firmware is a bit more surprising, looks like
something bad happened on the PCI express bus or the kernel tried to
access something that the card rejected (target abort or PCIe
equivalent most likely), thus
On Don, 2012-02-16 at 19:02 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 08:50 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
The second case with no firmware is a bit more surprising, looks like
something bad happened on the PCI express bus or the kernel tried to
access something that
Hello Daniel Vetter,
The patch 96154f2faba5: drm/i915: switch ring-id to be a real id
from Dec 14, 2011, leads to the following warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:688 print_error_buffers()
error: err-ring is never equal to -1 (wrong type 0 - 15).
@@ -724,6 +724,7 @@ static
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 09:26 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
For that one, I'd try adding some more debugging output to
radeon_get_bios() to find out which method it ends up using to
retrieve
the ROM contents, and why it doesn't look like it's an ATOM BIOS.
Is it an Apple card or an x86
Hi Linus,
3 radeon fixes, I have some exynos fixes to push later but I'll queue them
separately once I've looked them over a bit.
Dave.
The following changes since commit ce5afed937f0a823d3b00c9459409c3f5f2fbd5d:
Merge git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6 (2012-02-13 20:34:44 -0800)
are
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 06:53:55PM +0100, Danny Kukawka wrote:
This reverts commit e167976ee7f5fe4b80f7e8f55e087f6c67cf9562,
Since this was already fixed in commit
3bd3c9329973a93fa3ef5e9840f2fd6fa2889e3f some days before this
commit cause seq_file.h to be included twice.
Signed-off-by:
gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
在 2012年2月16日 下午5:21，Chen Jie ch...@lemote.com 写道：
Hi,
在 2012年2月15日 下午11:53，Jerome Glisse j.gli...@gmail.com 写道：
To me it looks like the CP is trying to fetch memory but the
GPU memory controller fail to fullfill cp request. Did you
check the PCI configuration before after (when things don't
Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 11:03 +0100 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things.
which was introduced by the following commit.
96154f2faba5: drm/i915: switch ring-id to be a real id
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
The URL
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46161
Bug #: 46161
Summary: [regression] Commit 356eb0aadb causes compiz redraw
issues
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86-64
Hi all,
drm/i915 has write/read paths to upload/download data to/from gpu buffer
objects. For a bunch of reasons we have special fastpaths with decent setup
costs, so when we fall back to the slow-path we don't fully recover to the
fastest fast-path when grabbing our locks again. This is also in
drm/i915 wants to read/write more than one page in its fastpath
and hence needs to prefault more than PAGE_SIZE bytes.
I've checked the callsites and they all already clamp size when
calling fault_in_pages_* to the same as for the subsequent
__copy_to|from_user and hence don't rely on the
Useful when the page is already mapped to copy date in/out.
For -stable because the next patch (fixing phys obj pwrite) needs this
little helper function.
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c | 23
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:12:49AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 05:59:45PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 2/15/12 5:42 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
+#define DRM_SET_CONFIG_TEST (10) /* don't change the config, just test
it for validity */
This would be OK for cases
- Original Message -
Many of us really want (and need) a way to set the whole display
configuration atomically, as well as test a global config.
In talking with Rob and Alex here at ELC a bit, I think this may be
enough:
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mode.h b/include/drm/drm_mode.h
Folks:
I recently uncovered a bug in the block layer. It uses a workqueue to
periodically probe removable drives for media or other state changes,
and the workqueue it uses is system_nrt_wq.
The bug is that system_nrt_wq is not freezable, so it keeps on running
even while the system is in the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:32:08PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
@@ -416,17 +417,20 @@ static inline int fault_in_pages_writeable(char
__user *uaddr, int size)
* Writing zeroes into userspace here is OK,
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 22:43 -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
Quick question; if I want to validate a mode given to me by a
connector/encoder as workable or not before I am going through the
code to actually set that mode, how would I do this?
I think this is an API bug. The crtc really should get a
Hello, (cc'ing Rafael and Jens)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:41:34AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
non-reentrant? And if I do, which of the usages above should be
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:22:24PM +, David Howells wrote:
Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
non-reentrant? And if I do, which of the usages
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:27:28AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
These should all be freezable and we might even be able to get away
with WQ_UNBOUND for some of these.
In general, I would recommend specifying as few special attribute as
possible. If WQ_UNBOUND is necessary (large amount
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:21:10PM +0800, Chen Jie wrote:
Hi,
在 2012年2月15日 下午11:53，Jerome Glisse j.gli...@gmail.com 写道：
To me it looks like the CP is trying to fetch memory but the
GPU memory controller fail to fullfill cp request. Did you
check the PCI configuration before after (when
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, (cc'ing Rafael and Jens)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:41:34AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
non-reentrant? And if I
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:35:51PM +, David Howells wrote:
The key_garbage_collector work item is marked neither freezable nor
unfreezable that I can see.
Heh, was too brief apparently. :)
I was trying to say that if it doesn't require freezing, please don't
put it on a freezable
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:27:28AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
These should all be freezable and we might even be able to get away
with WQ_UNBOUND for some of these.
In general, I would recommend specifying as few special attribute as
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:37:33AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
Um. I don't think I can audit all the calls in the kernel that submit
block requests and determine which ones need to be allowed while a
system sleep is in progress.
??? we need to do that anyway and the ones which should go
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:46:39 -0800 (PST)
Jakob Bornecrantz ja...@vmware.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Many of us really want (and need) a way to set the whole display
configuration atomically, as well as test a global config.
In talking with Rob and Alex here at ELC a bit, I
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:37:33AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
Um. I don't think I can audit all the calls in the kernel that submit
block requests and determine which ones need to be allowed while a
system sleep is in progress.
??? we need
Hello, Jeff.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:59:45PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
The other problem here is that we really ought to be submitting the
write completion handler to a workqueue that has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set.
Since none of the public wq's have that then I guess we'll have to make
our own?
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42787
Summary: Video flickers on X1200 / RS690 over DVI
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 22:43 -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
Quick question; if I want to validate a mode given to me by a
connector/encoder as workable or not before I am going through the
code to actually set that mode, how would
Hi Koen,
On Thursday 16 February 2012 23:46:51 Beel, Koen wrote:
Hi Laurent,
Would it be possible to give us your number on which you can be reached next
Monday? I prefer to init the call from our side as we will join the call
with two people and we will be in a meeting room... (so not
Hello everybody,
First of all, I would like to thank all the attendees for their participation
in the mini-summit that helped make the meeting a success.
Here are my consolidated notes that cover both the Linaro Connect meeting and
the ELC meeting. They're also available at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42611
--- Comment #5 from Cesare Leonardi celeo...@gmail.com 2012-02-16 15:54:01
UTC ---
Will, have you already upgraded to Mesa 8 from experimental?
The problem is not resolved for me (i855) and i do not reopen this bug only
because your bug is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45018
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com 2012-02-16
16:19:08 PST ---
I was not able to find the root of the problem. However, I have many message
telling me the following:
Radon :01:00.0: no 880214144000 via
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45018
--- Comment #18 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com 2012-02-16
16:31:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 57178
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=57178
dmesg with bo conflict
Latest dmesg with the bo conflicts.
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com 2012-02-17 05:38:13
---
(In reply to comment #18)
Is this still a problem in 3.2 / 3.3-rc1?
Here's a report using 3.0 and 3.2.4:
http://bugs.debian.org/659673
--
Configure bugmail:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:03:29AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things.
Sorry, I should have said that it's not a gcc warning, it's a
smatch thing. But also it's not uber-anal. It's the exact level of
anality which is required to make the == -1
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
@@ -416,17 +417,20 @@ static inline int fault_in_pages_writeable(char __user
*uaddr, int size)
* Writing zeroes into userspace here is OK, because we know that if
* the zero gets there, we'll be
Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
non-reentrant? And if I do, which of the usages above should be
converted to the new workqueue?
As far as keys are
Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
non-reentrant? And if I do, which of the usages above should be
converted to the new workqueue?
As far as keys are
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:29:51 -0800
Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:27:28AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
These should all be freezable and we might even be able to get away
with WQ_UNBOUND for some of these.
In general, I would recommend specifying as
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 08:39 +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > Btw, to sum up the list of Power Architecture machines with PCIE that
> > > aim to be a desktop/workstation: Apple iMac G5 (iSight), Apple PowerMac
> > > Quad G5, YDL Powerstation 2x970MP and Acube Sam460ex . And the last
> > > two,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 05:59:45PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 2/15/12 5:42 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> >+#define DRM_SET_CONFIG_TEST (1<<0) /* don't change the config, just test it
> >for validity */
> >+
> >+struct drm_mode_set_config {
> >+__u64 crtcs;
> >+__u64 crtc_fbs;
> >+
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:16:52PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com) wrote:
> > Hi Keith,
> >
> > * Keith Packard (keithp at keithp.com) wrote:
> > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:56:21 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers > > at efficios.com> wrote:
> > >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:28:10 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 08:39 +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> > > > Btw, to sum up the list of Power Architecture machines with
> > > > PCIE that aim to be a desktop/workstation:
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 23:55 +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> From: Lucas Stach
>
> This patch implements the drivers hooks needed for precise vblank
> timestamping. This is a complementary patch to Mario Kleiner's
> patches to improve swap scheduling. With the complete
> patchset applied nouveau
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 2/8/12 6:19 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>>
>> Similar to i915, it's nice to be able to query this device uniquely and
>> get some info
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
>
>
> So, this is actually not especially useful as written. ?You'd like
On Don, 2012-02-16 at 01:05 +, acrux wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:28:10 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 08:39 +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >
> > > > > Btw, to sum up the list of Power Architecture machines with
> > > > > PCIE that aim to be a
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 08:50 +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > The second case with no firmware is a bit more surprising, looks like
> > > something bad happened on the PCI express bus or the kernel tried to
> > > access something that the card rejected (target abort or PCIe
> > > equivalent most
On Don, 2012-02-16 at 19:02 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 08:50 +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > The second case with no firmware is a bit more surprising, looks like
> > > > something bad happened on the PCI express bus or the kernel tried to
> > > > access
Hello Daniel Vetter,
The patch 96154f2faba5: "drm/i915: switch ring->id to be a real id"
from Dec 14, 2011, leads to the following warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:688 print_error_buffers()
error: err->ring is never equal to -1 (wrong type 0 - 15).
@@ -724,6 +724,7 @@
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 09:26 +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > For that one, I'd try adding some more debugging output to
> > > radeon_get_bios() to find out which method it ends up using to
> retrieve
> > > the ROM contents, and why it doesn't look like it's an ATOM BIOS.
> >
> > Is it an Apple
Hi,
? 2012?2?15? ??11:53?Jerome Glisse ???
> To me it looks like the CP is trying to fetch memory but the
> GPU memory controller fail to fullfill cp request. Did you
> check the PCI configuration before & after (when things don't
> work) My best guest is PCI bus mastering is no properly working
Hi Linus,
3 radeon fixes, I have some exynos fixes to push later but I'll queue them
separately once I've looked them over a bit.
Dave.
The following changes since commit ce5afed937f0a823d3b00c9459409c3f5f2fbd5d:
Merge git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6 (2012-02-13 20:34:44 -0800)
are
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 06:53:55PM +0100, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> This reverts commit e167976ee7f5fe4b80f7e8f55e087f6c67cf9562,
> Since this was already fixed in commit
> 3bd3c9329973a93fa3ef5e9840f2fd6fa2889e3f some days before this
> commit cause seq_file.h to be included twice.
>
>
? 2012?2?16? ??5:21?Chen Jie ???
> Hi,
>
> ? 2012?2?15? ??11:53?Jerome Glisse ???
>> To me it looks like the CP is trying to fetch memory but the
>> GPU memory controller fail to fullfill cp request. Did you
>> check the PCI configuration before & after (when things don't
>> work) My best guest
text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120216/eac6e9df/attachment.pgp>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46161
Bug #: 46161
Summary: [regression] Commit 356eb0aadb causes compiz redraw
issues
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86-64
Hi all,
drm/i915 has write/read paths to upload/download data to/from gpu buffer
objects. For a bunch of reasons we have special fastpaths with decent setup
costs, so when we fall back to the slow-path we don't fully recover to the
fastest fast-path when grabbing our locks again. This is also in
drm/i915 wants to read/write more than one page in its fastpath
and hence needs to prefault more than PAGE_SIZE bytes.
I've checked the callsites and they all already clamp size when
calling fault_in_pages_* to the same as for the subsequent
__copy_to|from_user and hence don't rely on the
Useful when the page is already mapped to copy date in/out.
For -stable because the next patch (fixing phys obj pwrite) needs this
little helper function.
Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c | 23 +++
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:12:49AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 05:59:45PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On 2/15/12 5:42 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >
> > >+#define DRM_SET_CONFIG_TEST (1<<0) /* don't change the config, just test
> > >it for validity */
This would be OK
- Original Message -
> Many of us really want (and need) a way to set the whole display
> configuration atomically, as well as test a global config.
>
> In talking with Rob and Alex here at ELC a bit, I think this may be
> enough:
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mode.h
- Original Message -
> From: Adam Jackson
>
> This is about as minimal of a virtual GEM service as possible. My
> plan is to use this with non-native-3D hardware for buffer sharing
> between X and DRI.
>
> The current drisw winsys assumes an unmodified X server, which means
> it's
Folks:
I recently uncovered a bug in the block layer. It uses a workqueue to
periodically probe removable drives for media or other state changes,
and the workqueue it uses is system_nrt_wq.
The bug is that system_nrt_wq is not freezable, so it keeps on running
even while the system is in the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:32:08PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > @@ -416,17 +417,20 @@ static inline int fault_in_pages_writeable(char
> > __user *uaddr, int size)
> > ? ? ? ? * Writing zeroes into userspace here is OK, because we know
lication/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120216/c67623ea/attachment.pgp>
Hello, (cc'ing Rafael and Jens)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:41:34AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
> should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
> non-reentrant? And if I do, which of the usages above should be
>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:22:24PM +, David Howells wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
> > should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
> > non-reentrant? And if I do, which of the usages above should be
>
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:27:28AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> These should all be freezable and we might even be able to get away
> with WQ_UNBOUND for some of these.
In general, I would recommend specifying as few special attribute as
possible. If WQ_UNBOUND is necessary (large amount
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:21:10PM +0800, Chen Jie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ? 2012?2?15? ??11:53?Jerome Glisse ???
> > To me it looks like the CP is trying to fetch memory but the
> > GPU memory controller fail to fullfill cp request. Did you
> > check the PCI configuration before & after (when things
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, (cc'ing Rafael and Jens)
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:41:34AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
> > should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
> > non-reentrant?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:35:51PM +, David Howells wrote:
> The key_garbage_collector work item is marked neither freezable nor
> unfreezable that I can see.
Heh, was too brief apparently. :)
I was trying to say that if it doesn't require freezing, please don't
put it on a freezable
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:27:28AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > These should all be freezable and we might even be able to get away
> > with WQ_UNBOUND for some of these.
>
> In general, I would recommend specifying as few special attribute
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:37:33AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> Um. I don't think I can audit all the calls in the kernel that submit
> block requests and determine which ones need to be allowed while a
> system sleep is in progress.
??? we need to do that anyway and the ones which should
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:46:39 -0800 (PST)
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Many of us really want (and need) a way to set the whole display
> > configuration atomically, as well as test a global config.
> >
> > In talking with Rob and Alex here at ELC a bit, I think
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:37:33AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Um. I don't think I can audit all the calls in the kernel that submit
> > block requests and determine which ones need to be allowed while a
> > system sleep is in progress.
>
>
Hello, Jeff.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:59:45PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The other problem here is that we really ought to be submitting the
> write completion handler to a workqueue that has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set.
> Since none of the public wq's have that then I guess we'll have to make
> our
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42787
Summary: Video flickers on X1200 / RS690 over DVI
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 22:43 -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
>> Quick question; if I want to validate a mode given to me by a
>> connector/encoder as workable or not before I am going through the
>> code to actually set that mode, how would I do
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42611
--- Comment #5 from Cesare Leonardi 2012-02-16 15:54:01
UTC ---
Will, have you already upgraded to Mesa 8 from experimental?
The problem is not resolved for me (i855) and i do not reopen this bug only
because your bug is specific to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45018
--- Comment #18 from Alexandre Demers
2012-02-16 16:31:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 57178
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=57178
dmesg with bo conflict
Latest dmesg with the bo conflicts.
--
Configure bugmail:
nature
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120216/007fc5b2/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> @@ -416,17 +417,20 @@ static inline int fault_in_pages_writeable(char __user
> *uaddr, int size)
> ? ? ? ? * Writing zeroes into userspace here is OK, because we know that if
> ? ? ? ? * the zero gets there, we'll be overwriting it.
> ? ?
Alan Stern wrote:
> My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
> should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
> non-reentrant? And if I do, which of the usages above should be
> converted to the new workqueue?
As far as keys are concerned, it's only
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:41:34 -0500 (EST)
Alan Stern wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I recently uncovered a bug in the block layer. It uses a workqueue to
> periodically probe removable drives for media or other state changes,
> and the workqueue it uses is system_nrt_wq.
>
> The bug is that system_nrt_wq
Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > My question to all of you: Should system_nrt_wq be made freezable, or
> > > should I create a new workqueue that is both freezable and
> > > non-reentrant? And if I do, which of the usages above should be
> > > converted to the new workqueue?
> >
> > As far as keys
88 matches
Mail list logo
