Hi Chris,
On 11 August 2016 at 20:16, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a
> timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not
> need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are
> those callers that
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:19:50PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 11 August 2016 at 20:16, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a
> > timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not
> > need to handle
Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a
timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not
need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are
those callers that wish to differentiate the error code between the
nonblocking busy
