Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

2020-06-26 Thread Sumit Semwal
Hi Christian, On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 18:10 Daniel Vetter, wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:03 AM Christian König > wrote: > > > > Am 26.06.20 um 06:43 schrieb Sumit Semwal: > > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > >> Ignoring everything else ... > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jun

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

2020-06-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:03 AM Christian König wrote: > > Am 26.06.20 um 06:43 schrieb Sumit Semwal: > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> Ignoring everything else ... > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula > >> wrote: > >>> As a side note, there seem to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

2020-06-26 Thread Christian König
Am 26.06.20 um 06:43 schrieb Sumit Semwal: On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: Ignoring everything else ... On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula wrote: As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

2020-06-25 Thread Sumit Semwal
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Ignoring everything else ... > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula > wrote: > > As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when > > applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there are no such checks for > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

2020-06-25 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 05:27, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Dave Airlie wrote: > > WTUF? > > > > How did this ever land in my tree, there is no ACK on this from anyone > > in core dma-buf, > > > > Intel team, clean your house up here, I'm going to have to ask you to > > stop Chris

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

2020-06-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
Ignoring everything else ... On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula wrote: > As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when > applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there are no such checks for > drm-misc. One option to generalize that that I pondered is to consult

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

2020-06-25 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Dave Airlie wrote: > WTUF? > > How did this ever land in my tree, there is no ACK on this from anyone > in core dma-buf, > > Intel team, clean your house up here, I'm going to have to ask you to > stop Chris merging stuff without oversight, if this sort of thing > happens,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

2020-06-25 Thread Dave Airlie
WTUF? How did this ever land in my tree, there is no ACK on this from anyone in core dma-buf, Intel team, clean your house up here, I'm going to have to ask you to stop Chris merging stuff without oversight, if this sort of thing happens, this is totally unacceptable. Dave. Signed-off-by: