Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v3

2017-02-16 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 16-02-17 om 10:45 schreef Jani Nikula: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Sinclair Yeh wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2017, Maarten Lankhorst >>> wrote: This was somehow lost between v3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v3

2017-02-16 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Sinclair Yeh wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Jan 2017, Maarten Lankhorst >> wrote: >> > This was somehow lost between v3 and the merged version in Maarten's >> > patch

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v3

2017-02-15 Thread Sinclair Yeh
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:56:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2017, Maarten Lankhorst > wrote: > > This was somehow lost between v3 and the merged version in Maarten's > > patch merged as: > > > > commit f2d580b9a8149735cbc4b59c4a8df60173658140

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/4] drm: Resurrect atomic rmfb code, v3

2017-02-15 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > This was somehow lost between v3 and the merged version in Maarten's > patch merged as: > > commit f2d580b9a8149735cbc4b59c4a8df60173658140 > Author: Maarten Lankhorst > Date: