Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Wed 12 Sep 08:08 PDT 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> index a76b963a7e50..02aefb2b2d47 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static const struct file_operations rpmsg_eptdev_fops = {
> .write = rpmsg_eptdev_write,
> .poll = rpmsg_eptdev_poll,
> .unlocked_ioctl = rpmsg_eptdev_ioctl,
> - .compat_ioctl = rpmsg_eptdev_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> };
>
> static ssize_t name_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static const struct file_operations rpmsg_ctrldev_fops = {
> .open = rpmsg_ctrldev_open,
> .release = rpmsg_ctrldev_release,
> .unlocked_ioctl = rpmsg_ctrldev_ioctl,
> - .compat_ioctl = rpmsg_ctrldev_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> };
>
For rpmsg part
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson
Regards,
Bjorn
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:18:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:59 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:51:08AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 09:57:48PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:35:06PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Darren Hart (VMware) > > > > > > > > > > As for a longer term solution, would it be possible to init fops in > > > > > such > > > > > a way that the compat_ioctl call defaults to > > > > > generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg > > > > > so we don't have to duplicate this boilerplate for every ioctl fops > > > > > structure? > > > > > > > > Bad idea, that... Because several years down the road somebody > > > > will add > > > > an ioctl that takes an unsigned int for argument. Without so much as > > > > looking > > > > at your magical mystery macro being used to initialize file_operations. > > > > > > Fair, being explicit in the declaration as it is currently may be > > > preferable then. > > > > It would be much cleaner and safer if you could arrange things to add > > something like this to struct file_operations: > > > > long (*ptr_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, void __user *); > > > > Where the core code automatically converts the unsigned long to the > > void __user * as appropriate. > > > > Then it just works right always and the compiler will help address > > Al's concern down the road. > > I think if we wanted to do this with a new file operation, the best > way would be to do the copy_from_user()/copy_to_user() in the caller > as well. > > We already do this inside of some subsystems, notably drivers/media/, > and it simplifies the implementation of the ioctl handler function > significantly. We obviously cannot do this in general, both because of > traditional drivers that have 16-bit command codes (drivers/tty and others) > and also because of drivers that by accident defined the commands > incorrectly and use the wrong type or the wrong direction in the > definition. That could work well, but the first idea could be done globally and mechanically, while this would require very careful per-driver investigation. Particularly if the core code has worse performance.. ie due to kmalloc calls or something. I think it would make more sense to start by having the core do the case to __user and then add another entry point to have the core do the copy_from_user, and so on. Jason ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:35 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:18:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:59 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:51:08AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 09:57:48PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:35:06PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > We already do this inside of some subsystems, notably drivers/media/, > > and it simplifies the implementation of the ioctl handler function > > significantly. We obviously cannot do this in general, both because of > > traditional drivers that have 16-bit command codes (drivers/tty and others) > > and also because of drivers that by accident defined the commands > > incorrectly and use the wrong type or the wrong direction in the > > definition. > > That could work well, but the first idea could be done globally and > mechanically, while this would require very careful per-driver > investigation. > > Particularly if the core code has worse performance.. ie due to > kmalloc calls or something. > > I think it would make more sense to start by having the core do the > case to __user and then add another entry point to have the core do > the copy_from_user, and so on. Having six separate callback pointers to implement a single system call seems a bit excessive though. Arnd ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:59 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:51:08AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 09:57:48PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:35:06PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > > > > > > Acked-by: Darren Hart (VMware) > > > > > > > > As for a longer term solution, would it be possible to init fops in such > > > > a way that the compat_ioctl call defaults to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg > > > > so we don't have to duplicate this boilerplate for every ioctl fops > > > > structure? > > > > > > Bad idea, that... Because several years down the road somebody will > > > add > > > an ioctl that takes an unsigned int for argument. Without so much as > > > looking > > > at your magical mystery macro being used to initialize file_operations. > > > > Fair, being explicit in the declaration as it is currently may be > > preferable then. > > It would be much cleaner and safer if you could arrange things to add > something like this to struct file_operations: > > long (*ptr_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, void __user *); > > Where the core code automatically converts the unsigned long to the > void __user * as appropriate. > > Then it just works right always and the compiler will help address > Al's concern down the road. I think if we wanted to do this with a new file operation, the best way would be to do the copy_from_user()/copy_to_user() in the caller as well. We already do this inside of some subsystems, notably drivers/media/, and it simplifies the implementation of the ioctl handler function significantly. We obviously cannot do this in general, both because of traditional drivers that have 16-bit command codes (drivers/tty and others) and also because of drivers that by accident defined the commands incorrectly and use the wrong type or the wrong direction in the definition. Arnd ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:51:08AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 09:57:48PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:35:06PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > > > > Acked-by: Darren Hart (VMware) > > > > > > As for a longer term solution, would it be possible to init fops in such > > > a way that the compat_ioctl call defaults to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg > > > so we don't have to duplicate this boilerplate for every ioctl fops > > > structure? > > > > Bad idea, that... Because several years down the road somebody will add > > an ioctl that takes an unsigned int for argument. Without so much as > > looking > > at your magical mystery macro being used to initialize file_operations. > > Fair, being explicit in the declaration as it is currently may be > preferable then. It would be much cleaner and safer if you could arrange things to add something like this to struct file_operations: long (*ptr_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, void __user *); Where the core code automatically converts the unsigned long to the void __user * as appropriate. Then it just works right always and the compiler will help address Al's concern down the road. Cheers, Jason ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 09:57:48PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:35:06PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > > Acked-by: Darren Hart (VMware) > > > > As for a longer term solution, would it be possible to init fops in such > > a way that the compat_ioctl call defaults to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg > > so we don't have to duplicate this boilerplate for every ioctl fops > > structure? > > Bad idea, that... Because several years down the road somebody will add > an ioctl that takes an unsigned int for argument. Without so much as looking > at your magical mystery macro being used to initialize file_operations. Fair, being explicit in the declaration as it is currently may be preferable then. -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:08:52 +0200
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The .ioctl and .compat_ioctl file operations have the same prototype so
> they can both point to the same function, which works great almost all
> the time when all the commands are compatible.
>
> One exception is the s390 architecture, where a compat pointer is only
> 31 bit wide, and converting it into a 64-bit pointer requires calling
> compat_ptr(). Most drivers here will ever run in s390, but since we now
> have a generic helper for it, it's easy enough to use it consistently.
>
> I double-checked all these drivers to ensure that all ioctl arguments
> are used as pointers or are ignored, but are not interpreted as integer
> values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
For IIO part.
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron
Thanks,
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> index a062cfddc5af..22844b94b0e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> @@ -1630,7 +1630,7 @@ static const struct file_operations iio_buffer_fileops
> = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .llseek = noop_llseek,
> .unlocked_ioctl = iio_ioctl,
> - .compat_ioctl = iio_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> };
>
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 01:35:06PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > Acked-by: Darren Hart (VMware) > > As for a longer term solution, would it be possible to init fops in such > a way that the compat_ioctl call defaults to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg > so we don't have to duplicate this boilerplate for every ioctl fops > structure? Bad idea, that... Because several years down the road somebody will add an ioctl that takes an unsigned int for argument. Without so much as looking at your magical mystery macro being used to initialize file_operations. FWIW, I would name that helper in more blunt way - something like compat_ioctl_only_compat_pointer_ioctls_here()... ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The .ioctl and .compat_ioctl file operations have the same prototype so
> they can both point to the same function, which works great almost all
> the time when all the commands are compatible.
>
> One exception is the s390 architecture, where a compat pointer is only
> 31 bit wide, and converting it into a 64-bit pointer requires calling
> compat_ptr(). Most drivers here will ever run in s390, but since we now
> have a generic helper for it, it's easy enough to use it consistently.
>
> I double-checked all these drivers to ensure that all ioctl arguments
> are used as pointers or are ignored, but are not interpreted as integer
> values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
...
> drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 2 +-
...
> static void link_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> index 04791ea5d97b..e4d0697e07d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> @@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static const struct file_operations wmi_fops = {
> .read = wmi_char_read,
> .open = wmi_char_open,
> .unlocked_ioctl = wmi_ioctl,
> - .compat_ioctl = wmi_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> };
For platform/drivers/x86:
Acked-by: Darren Hart (VMware)
As for a longer term solution, would it be possible to init fops in such
a way that the compat_ioctl call defaults to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
so we don't have to duplicate this boilerplate for every ioctl fops
structure?
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The .ioctl and .compat_ioctl file operations have the same prototype so > they can both point to the same function, which works great almost all > the time when all the commands are compatible. > > One exception is the s390 architecture, where a compat pointer is only > 31 bit wide, and converting it into a 64-bit pointer requires calling > compat_ptr(). Most drivers here will ever run in s390, but since we now > have a generic helper for it, it's easy enough to use it consistently. > > I double-checked all these drivers to ensure that all ioctl arguments > are used as pointers or are ignored, but are not interpreted as integer > values. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > fs/btrfs/super.c| 2 +- Acked-by: David Sterba ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The .ioctl and .compat_ioctl file operations have the same prototype so
> they can both point to the same function, which works great almost all
> the time when all the commands are compatible.
>
> One exception is the s390 architecture, where a compat pointer is only
> 31 bit wide, and converting it into a 64-bit pointer requires calling
> compat_ptr(). Most drivers here will ever run in s390, but since we now
> have a generic helper for it, it's easy enough to use it consistently.
>
> I double-checked all these drivers to ensure that all ioctl arguments
> are used as pointers or are ignored, but are not interpreted as integer
> values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
> drivers/android/binder.c| 2 +-
> drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_ctl_drv.c | 2 +-
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 4 +---
> drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +-
> drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c| 2 +-
> drivers/hid/hidraw.c| 4 +---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 4 +---
> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c | 4 +---
> drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c | 2 +-
> drivers/nvdimm/bus.c| 4 ++--
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c| 2 +-
> drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c | 2 +-
> drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/sbus/char/display7seg.c | 2 +-
> drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c | 4 +---
> drivers/scsi/3w-.c | 4 +---
> drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.c| 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_main.c | 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c | 4 +---
> drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c | 4 +---
> drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_user.c | 2 +-
> drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c | 4 +---
> drivers/video/fbdev/ps3fb.c | 2 +-
> drivers/virt/fsl_hypervisor.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/super.c| 2 +-
> fs/ceph/dir.c | 2 +-
> fs/ceph/file.c | 2 +-
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 2 +-
> fs/userfaultfd.c| 2 +-
> net/rfkill/core.c | 2 +-
> 37 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
> index 823beca448e1..f4755c1c9cfa 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
> @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static const struct file_operations uverbs_fops = {
> .release = ib_uverbs_close,
> .llseek = no_llseek,
> .unlocked_ioctl = ib_uverbs_ioctl,
> - .compat_ioctl = ib_uverbs_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> };
>
> static const struct file_operations uverbs_mmap_fops = {
> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ static const struct file_operations uverbs_mmap_fops = {
> .release = ib_uverbs_close,
> .llseek = no_llseek,
> .unlocked_ioctl = ib_uverbs_ioctl,
> - .compat_ioctl = ib_uverbs_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> };
>
> static struct ib_client uverbs_client = {
For uverbs:
Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe
It is very strange, this patch did not appear in the RDMA patchworks,
I almost missed it :|
Jason
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The .ioctl and .compat_ioctl file operations have the same prototype so > they can both point to the same function, which works great almost all > the time when all the commands are compatible. > > One exception is the s390 architecture, where a compat pointer is only > 31 bit wide, and converting it into a 64-bit pointer requires calling > compat_ptr(). Most drivers here will ever run in s390, but since we now > have a generic helper for it, it's easy enough to use it consistently. > > I double-checked all these drivers to ensure that all ioctl arguments > are used as pointers or are ignored, but are not interpreted as integer > values. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
Em Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:08:52 +0200
Arnd Bergmann escreveu:
> The .ioctl and .compat_ioctl file operations have the same prototype so
> they can both point to the same function, which works great almost all
> the time when all the commands are compatible.
>
> One exception is the s390 architecture, where a compat pointer is only
> 31 bit wide, and converting it into a 64-bit pointer requires calling
> compat_ptr(). Most drivers here will ever run in s390, but since we now
> have a generic helper for it, it's easy enough to use it consistently.
>
> I double-checked all these drivers to ensure that all ioctl arguments
> are used as pointers or are ignored, but are not interpreted as integer
> values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
> drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 4 +---
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c b/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
> index f862f1b7f996..077209f414ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
> @@ -730,9 +730,7 @@ static const struct file_operations lirc_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .write = ir_lirc_transmit_ir,
> .unlocked_ioctl = ir_lirc_ioctl,
> -#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> - .compat_ioctl = ir_lirc_ioctl,
> -#endif
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> .read = ir_lirc_read,
> .poll = ir_lirc_poll,
> .open = ir_lirc_open,
Adding an infrared remote controller to a s390 mainframe sounds fun :-)
I suspect that one could implement it on a s390 platform
using gpio-ir-recv and/or gpio-ir-tx drivers. Perhaps one possible
practical usage would be to let the mainframe to send remote
controller codes to adjust the air conditioning system ;-)
From lirc driver's PoV, there's nothing that really prevents one to
do that and use lirc API, and the driver is generic enough to work
on any hardware platform.
I didn't check the implementation of generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg(),
but assuming it is ok,
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Thanks,
Mauro
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] compat_ioctl: move more drivers to generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The .ioctl and .compat_ioctl file operations have the same prototype so
> they can both point to the same function, which works great almost all
> the time when all the commands are compatible.
>
> One exception is the s390 architecture, where a compat pointer is only
> 31 bit wide, and converting it into a 64-bit pointer requires calling
> compat_ptr(). Most drivers here will ever run in s390, but since we now
> have a generic helper for it, it's easy enough to use it consistently.
>
> I double-checked all these drivers to ensure that all ioctl arguments
> are used as pointers or are ignored, but are not interpreted as integer
> values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter
At least for the drm and dma-buf bits.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/android/binder.c| 2 +-
> drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_ctl_drv.c | 2 +-
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 4 +---
> drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +-
> drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c| 2 +-
> drivers/hid/hidraw.c| 4 +---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 4 +---
> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c | 4 +---
> drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c | 2 +-
> drivers/nvdimm/bus.c| 4 ++--
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c| 2 +-
> drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c | 2 +-
> drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/sbus/char/display7seg.c | 2 +-
> drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c | 4 +---
> drivers/scsi/3w-.c | 4 +---
> drivers/scsi/cxlflash/main.c| 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_main.c | 2 +-
> drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c | 4 +---
> drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c | 4 +---
> drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_user.c | 2 +-
> drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c | 4 +---
> drivers/video/fbdev/ps3fb.c | 2 +-
> drivers/virt/fsl_hypervisor.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/super.c| 2 +-
> fs/ceph/dir.c | 2 +-
> fs/ceph/file.c | 2 +-
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 2 +-
> fs/userfaultfd.c| 2 +-
> net/rfkill/core.c | 2 +-
> 37 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
> index d58763b6b009..d2464f5759f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> @@ -5576,7 +5576,7 @@ static const struct file_operations binder_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .poll = binder_poll,
> .unlocked_ioctl = binder_ioctl,
> - .compat_ioctl = binder_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> .mmap = binder_mmap,
> .open = binder_open,
> .flush = binder_flush,
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_ctl_drv.c
> b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_ctl_drv.c
> index abc7a7f64d64..8ff77a70addc 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_ctl_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_ctl_drv.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static long adf_ctl_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int
> cmd, unsigned long arg);
> static const struct file_operations adf_ctl_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .unlocked_ioctl = adf_ctl_ioctl,
> - .compat_ioctl = adf_ctl_ioctl,
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> };
>
> struct adf_ctl_drv_info {
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 13884474d158..a6d7dc4cf7e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -325,9 +325,7 @@ static const struct file_operations dma_buf_fops = {
> .llseek = dma_buf_llseek,
> .poll = dma_buf_poll,
> .unlocked_ioctl = dma_buf_ioctl,
> -#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> - .compat_ioctl = dma_buf_ioctl,
> -#endif
> + .compat_ioctl = generic_compat_ioctl_ptrarg,
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
> index 53c1d6d36a64..bc810506d487 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
> @@ -419,5 +419,5 @@ const struct file_operations sw_sync_debugfs_fops = {
> .open = sw_sync_debugfs_open,
> .release= sw_sync_debugfs_release,
> .unlocked_ioctl = sw_sync_ioctl,
>
