On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 18:08 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 17:03 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
+ obj_priv-bit_17 = kmalloc(page_count, GFP_KERNEL);
seems like you could save a bit of memory here by using 1 bit per page
instead of a byte.
Before, I was figuring it
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 10:25 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
Before, I was figuring it was better to have easy code than memory
optimal code in my infrequently-tested workaround. Since recent notes
about kmalloc limits, I'll switch to using bitmap.h.
Yeah, a single page of bits will cover 32k of
Save the bit 17 state of the pages when freeing the page list, and
reswizzle them if necessary when rebinding the pages. This exposes two new
swizzle enums to userland, which would have to be respected for correct
operation of software fallbacks on these objects. Given that users
complain that
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 17:03 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
+ obj_priv-bit_17 = kmalloc(page_count, GFP_KERNEL);
seems like you could save a bit of memory here by using 1 bit per page
instead of a byte.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:08:14 -0700
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 17:03 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
+ obj_priv-bit_17 = kmalloc(page_count, GFP_KERNEL);
seems like you could save a bit of memory here by using 1 bit per page
instead of a byte.
If
