Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:23 pm Thomas Hellström wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
The DRM design includes ioctls to allow a userland driver to tell the
kernel driver when to register its interrupt handler and on what IRQ.
This is a really bad idea for several
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The DRM design includes ioctls to allow a userland driver to tell the kernel
driver when to register its interrupt handler and on what IRQ. This is a
really bad idea for several reasons, and fortunately I don't think any
Jesse Barnes wrote:
The DRM design includes ioctls to allow a userland driver to tell the kernel
driver when to register its interrupt handler and on what IRQ. This is a
really bad idea for several reasons, and fortunately I don't think any DDX
drivers take advantage of the no, use this
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:03 pm Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The DRM design includes ioctls to allow a userland driver to tell the
kernel driver when to register its interrupt handler and on what IRQ.
This is a
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:23 pm Thomas Hellström wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
The DRM design includes ioctls to allow a userland driver to tell the
kernel driver when to register its interrupt handler and on what IRQ.
This is a really bad idea for several reasons, and fortunately I
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:03 pm Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The DRM design includes ioctls to allow a userland driver to tell the
kernel driver
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:03 pm Stephane Marchesin wrote:
As for the new development model... Things are actually worse than I
thought. There are some fairly large differences between linux-core and
upstream, some of which have been in linux-core for a long time. It's
one thing to
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:03 pm Stephane Marchesin wrote:
As for the new development model... Things are actually worse than I
thought. There are some fairly large differences between linux-core and
upstream, some
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:28 pm Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:03 pm Stephane Marchesin wrote:
As for the new development model... Things are actually worse than I
thought. There are
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Thomas Hellström
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
The DRM design includes ioctls to allow a userland driver to tell the kernel
driver when to register its interrupt handler and on what IRQ. This is a
really bad idea for several reasons, and
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 4:15 pm Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Thomas Hellström
I've only tested this patch so far on i915, where it's still slightly
broken; I was planning on fixing it once I've sync'd some more
linux-core changes into drm-next (namely the rest of
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 09:15 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Thomas Hellström
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
The DRM design includes ioctls to allow a userland driver to tell the
kernel
driver when to register its interrupt handler and on what
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:13 pm Robert Noland wrote:
I kinda prompted this topic to come back to life... I'm less concerned
with the IRQ bits than I am with the vblank issue, but they are
currently tied together.
What I'm seeing right now, it that at least the intel ddx driver calls
the
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:13 pm Robert Noland wrote:
I kinda prompted this topic to come back to life... I'm less concerned
with the IRQ bits than I am with the vblank issue, but they are
currently tied together.
What I'm
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:03 pm Robert Noland wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 18:02 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:13 pm Robert Noland wrote:
I kinda prompted this topic to come back to life... I'm less concerned
with the IRQ bits than I am with the vblank
15 matches
Mail list logo
