While reviewing DS-2082 I realized that the way bitstreams are handled
in the provenance doesn't make much sense to me. I'll admit that I
don't think people are adding and removing bitstreams within
particular items all that often, but still, I feel that this is simply
an awful format for
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:27:16PM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
BTW the change I suggest would require some other work, as right now
we are lucky that the appending happens on the proper metadatavalue.
MetadataUtilities.appendMetadata clearly was supposed to index through
matching entries
Not entirely related to dc.description.provenance, but I want to see a
thorough validatable audit log from the system. i.e. Who changed
what/when/why/how. i.e. This Group name used to be ABC Staff, now it's
just Staff, who did that, when did they do that, what was the previous
value. What changes
