I have been working with the git tree. I'll give it another try this
weekend and see if I can provide a decent trace.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 6, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:52:07 -0700
> Chris Lewicki wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>I wrote a few weeks back a
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:59:33 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> >
> > (As a note, I don't remember ever deciding this.)
> >
> > I don't love (read hate) auto*, but ATM the seems to be OK for dspam.
> >
> > I'm not opposed to switching to cmake or something else, but:
> > - I'd like to see a comparison b
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:58:43 you wrote:
> I'll commit this this week. If you have time, could you review the rest
> of the libdspam for similar problems?
>
This was the only exit() call I've found in the files which are linked to the
library. Howerver
objdump -t /path/to/libdspam.so | grep
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:09:06 +0100 (CET)
"Mate Gabri" wrote:
> >
> > Original-Nachricht
> >> Datum: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:55:26 +0100
> >> Von: Gabri Mate
> >> An: [email protected]
> >> Betreff: [Dspam-devel] forged from header - not scanning
> >
> >> Hey there!
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:33:51 +0200
Andreas Schneider wrote:
> When a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program
> from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files
> properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is
> preferred for the library to r
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:44:00 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:01:06 +0200
> Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 15 April 2009 22:36:22 Paul Cockings wrote:
> > >
> > > GIT Relocation
> > >
> > >
> > > Sourceforge now supports GIT, s
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:52:07 -0700
Chris Lewicki wrote:
> Hi,
> I wrote a few weeks back about work I did for patches to
> dspam's implementation for non-domainscale installations, as well as
> some patches to fix the DNS blacklist capability. I've been meaning
> to rebuild the patches aga
