spamdyke was clearly developed for all the lack of qmail and as you say Erwan,
it is useless for postfix which already implements all these features nicely.
On Friday, July 11, 2014 9:52 AM, Erwan David wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:22:43AM CEST, Eric Shubert said:
> On 07/10/2014 04:12
d LHLO here."
Maybe Tom or someone else of dspam can help here?
On Monday, June 9, 2014 12:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.06.2014 12:02, schrieb ML mail:
> Thanks to your help, I think I have found where DSPAM should get called for
> my setup: in the postfix before-queue conten
should work with any content filter as long as it
speaks SMTP. What do you think? I have the feeling that's exactly what we need
for our similar setup.
On Monday, June 9, 2014 11:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.06.2014 11:13, schrieb ML mail:
> In my understanding content filtering
tpd_scache
smtpd_use_tls = yes
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
virtual_mailbox_domains = mydomain.com
virtual_mailbox_maps = pgsql:/etc/postfix/vmailbox.cf
virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/run/dspam.sock
On Monday, June 9, 2014 10:17 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.06.2014 09:50,
nd has nothing to do with
dspam. Reindl pointed you to the docs for setting that up.
If you need more guidance for setting up a relay in postfix, search
for "postfix relay", or ask questions on the postfix-users mailing
list. Reindl already nudged you in the correct direction.
Tom
On
2014 18:37, schrieb ML mail:
> I am trying to configure a server as MX relay with dspam just for scanning
> spam and then forwarding the innocent mails to the end mail server. For this
> I have followed the doc/relay.txt file.
> I see it works and dspam treats the incoming mail but the problem
Hello,
I am trying to configure a server as MX relay with dspam just for scanning spam
and then forwarding the innocent mails to the end mail server. For this I have
followed the doc/relay.txt file.
I see it works and dspam treats the incoming mail but the problem is that
postfix is then tryin
.
Steven where are you? We need you!
On Friday, May 2, 2014 12:18 PM, P.V.Anthony wrote:
On 05/02/2014 01:43 PM, ML mail wrote:
> Any news? It's already quite a long time and it looks like this dspam
> mailing list is dead... is the dspam project maybe also dead?
I do not think dspam
Hi Stevan,
Any news? It's already quite a long time and it looks like this dspam mailing
list is dead... is the dspam project maybe also dead?
Regards
ML
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:10 PM, ML mail wrote:
Hi Stevan,
I was wondering if you already had time to start the
Hello,
I am planning to deploy dspam in a multi-domain mail hosting environment and
would like to know which would be the best settings you recommend for this kind
of environment?
What I mean with settings is mostly: trainingMode, Tokenizer, Algorithm, etc
and would you also recommend using a
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your feedback...
@Stevan, any input regarding support of dspam of various charsets?
Regards
ML
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:53 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12-03-14 14:29, ML mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Two
Hello,
Two questions:
How well does dspam perform with more "exotic" foreign languages such as
arabic, chinese, etc?
and how does dspam also work for fighting spam mails which include their
content in pictures jpeg/png/etc ?
Regards
ML
---
best).
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
Am 2014-02-04 15:45, schrieb ML mail:
Hi Stevan,
>
>
>My main concern is that it does not work out of the box such as other
>anti-spam tools like spamassassin. What I mean here is that dspam needs to go
>through a phase of l
hen I have the time in the next days to do so. Let me know if
you are interested and maybe if you could help me with it (my English is not
the best).
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
Am 2014-02-04 15:45, schrieb ML mail:
Hi Stevan,
>
>
>My main concern is that it doe
ow to train it.
But I don't know when I have the time in the next days to do so. Let me know if
you are interested and maybe if you could help me with it (my English is not
the best).
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
Am 2014-02-04 15:45, schrieb ML mail:
Hi Stevan,
&g
the best choice for such an environment?
btw: personally I believe that nothing is the best choice. Everything is good
and bad.
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
Am 2014-02-03 17:21, schrieb ML mail:
Hello,
>
>I would like to use dspam as the unique anti-spam filtering
Hello,
I would like to use dspam as the unique anti-spam filtering method on a mail
server (postfix+dovecot) which will host many domains and many mail user
accounts. Having played a bit with dspam, I have the feeling dspam is not the
best choice for such a non-homogenous environment. Would any
this corpus to pre-train new users when the corpus is big enough.
-הודעה מקורית-
>מאת: ML mail
>נשלח: שיש 13-12-2013 13:57
>נושא: Re: [Dspam-user] makeCorpus=on
>אל: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net;
>
>Hi Tom,
>
>Thanks for the hint. So I wasn't so wro
Regards
ML
On Friday, December 13, 2013 12:42 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 12/13/2013 11:34 AM, ML mail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just switched from TOE training mode to TUM in the hope of better
> results for new e-mail accounts. As recommended in the README I have
> turned on the make
Hi,
I just switched from TOE training mode to TUM in the hope of better results for
new e-mail accounts. As recommended in the README I have turned on the
makeCorpus preference.
Now regarding to that makeCorpus preference I was wondering what is the point
exactly in this option? or how is it
Hendrikx wrote:
On 12/05/2013 07:06 PM, ML mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using DSPAM with Postfix and have just installed Mailman as mailing
> list software. Now mails going to a mailing list get scanned by DSPAM,
> this makes sense and is great but I also noticed that mails sent by
>
Hello,
I am using DSPAM with Postfix and have just installed Mailman as mailing list
software. Now mails going to a mailing list get scanned by DSPAM, this makes
sense and is great but I also noticed that mails sent by Mailman (such as
automatic answer to requests made to Mailman) also pass thr
26/11/13 14:06, ML mail wrote:
> I am using the teft as TrainingMode. When I retrain dspam with that
> specific mail by moving it into the Spam folder I can see a new entry
> being written into the system.log file, here below would be an example:
>
>
: 1 in 151 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0010
Let me know if you would need any other details. I would be happy to provide
you with these.
Best,ML
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 1:40 PM, Steve Freegard
wrote:
On 26/11/13 10:49, ML mail wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Yes I
/11/13 22:53, ML mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the case where there is a mail account which receives a lot of
> spam mails which does not get marked as spam by dspam. The pattern of
> this mails looks like this: a few random words (3-7) with even sometime
> words which do not e
Hello,
I have the case where there is a mail account which receives a lot of spam
mails which does not get marked as spam by dspam. The pattern of this mails
looks like this: a few random words (3-7) with even sometime words which do not
exist or ar written weirdly (v1ägRÄ) followed by a link w
Hello,
I was wondering which driver offers the best performance with dspam? is it the
hash driver of a database driver such as PostgreSQL?
Right now I am using the PostgreSQL driver but in my case with one single mail
server I don't really see any advantages of using a database to store all the
On 13-11-13 21:58, ML mail wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for your answer, well yes indeeed I do receive ham and spam
> but my goal here would be to try and build up a good starting
> global corpus to avoid as much as possible spam since the beginning
> as I will be migrating qui
time without having an end user having to report the FN
and FP to dspam? Or am I just dreaming of science fiction stuff here ;-)
Cheers
ML
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:22 PM, Tom Hendrikx
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13-11-13 20:49, ML mail wrote:
&g
Hello,
I would like to know what you guys recommend as best method for training a
global user which will then be used for every accounts as a starting base. I
have defined my global user as such in the group file:
globalgroup:classification:*globaluser
and already trained it with the following
Hi Tom,
Just to mention I am running Debian 7 with the distribution packages of dspam
but instead of MySQL, PostgreSQL. Works like a charm! I believe that it will
work very well also with MySQL.
Cheers,
ML
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:32 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
Hi
Just a small note
d
now it works.
On Saturday, November 9, 2013 3:10 PM, ML mail wrote:
Hi,
Actually this is a fresh and new installation so there shouldn't be any user
defined settings. I check also with:
dspam_admin list pref mytestem...@domain.com signatureLocation
and this returns nothing, so I am sur
r the signatureLocation.
Anything else to check?
Thanks
On Saturday, November 9, 2013 4:24 AM, P.V.Anthony
wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:17, ML mail wrote:
> I would like to have the DSPAM signature in the mail header and not in
> the message itself as it is by default. Therefore I have added the
Hello,
I would like to have the DSPAM signature in the mail header and not in the
message itself as it is by default. Therefore I have added the following option
the dspam.conf:
Preference "signatureLocation=headers"
Unfortunately even after restarting DSPAM I stil see the signature in the
me
Hi,
I have configured a global group as explained in the README file with the goal
of having every mail accounts pre-loaded with a basic set of spam protection.
Regarding this I have a few questions. First of all here is the group
definition I have added to my group file:
global:classification
35 matches
Mail list logo
