I have a suggestion :)
upgrade geentoo to CentOS or Debian :)
Remo
On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An update on this issue: I'm able to reproduce this on 2 (amd64 hardened
> gentoo) boxes, and we are investigating the issue. Sadly, Stevan is a
> bit short on time curr
Hi,
An update on this issue: I'm able to reproduce this on 2 (amd64 hardened
gentoo) boxes, and we are investigating the issue. Sadly, Stevan is a
bit short on time currently, so this might take a bit longer than expected.
--
Tom
On 05/08/11 14:52, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:37
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:17:49 +0200
"Cyril'" wrote:
> Malformed!
> --
> "Aucun iphone n'a été exploité pour la rédaction de ce mail"
>
Hmmm... 'malformed'? Cela n'arriverait pas avec un iPhone!
;) Je sais, je sais tete de giniol. :)
> -Message d'origine-
> De:Stevan Bajić
> Envoyé:
... was just noticing the SQL queries were indeed malformed, which seemed the
basic issue... Sorry if i missed stg else...
--
"Aucun iphone n'a été exploité pour la rédaction de ce mail"
-Message d'origine-
De:Julien Vehent
Envoyé: 05/08/2011, 23:44
To: Cyril'
Cc: Dspam user
Objet:Re: [D
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:17:49 +0200, Cyril' wrote:
> Malformed!
> --
> "Aucun iphone n'a été exploité pour la rédaction de ce mail"
>
maybe you should try exploiting iphone for writing your emails, you
would avoid some malformations ;)
just teasing :p
> -Message d'origine-
> De:Stevan
Malformed!
--
"Aucun iphone n'a été exploité pour la rédaction de ce mail"
-Message d'origine-
De:Stevan Bajić
Envoyé: 05/08/2011, 22:48
To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet:Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM 3.10.0 released
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:02:17 +0200
"Cyril'" wrote:
> Clearly, they
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:02:17 +0200
"Cyril'" wrote:
> Clearly, they are !..
>
What?
> --
> "Aucun iphone n'a été exploité pour la rédaction de ce mail"
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De:Guillaume Hilt
> Envoyé: 05/08/2011, 14:56
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Objet:Re: [Dspam-us
Clearly, they are !..
--
"Aucun iphone n'a été exploité pour la rédaction de ce mail"
-Message d'origine-
De:Guillaume Hilt
Envoyé: 05/08/2011, 14:56
To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet:Re: [Dspam-user] DSPAM 3.10.0 released
# emerge --info
Portage 2.1.10.3 (default/linux/amd64
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:37:51 +0200
Guillaume Hilt wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot.
> I'm running MySQL 5.1.42.
> Mail server is running with Gentoo 2011 AMD64 and MySQL server is using
> OpenSolaris AMD64.
> MySQL librairies are both on 5.1.42.
>
Please post the output of "emerge --info".
>Guill
# emerge --info
Portage 2.1.10.3 (default/linux/amd64/10.0, gcc-4.4.5, glibc-2.12.2-r0,
2.6.38.2--std-ipv6-64 x86_64)
=
System uname:
Linux-2.6.38.2--std-ipv6-64-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Duo_CPU_E7300_@_2.66GHz-with-gentoo-2
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:36:25 +0200
Guillaume Hilt wrote:
> I checked my conf and tried with the original one (from 3.8.0) and the
> updated one (3.10.0) and the same errors occurs.
> I switched back to the previous version for now.
>
The problem is not the DSPAM configuration. It is something i
Sorry, I forgot.
I'm running MySQL 5.1.42.
Mail server is running with Gentoo 2011 AMD64 and MySQL server is using
OpenSolaris AMD64.
MySQL librairies are both on 5.1.42.
Guillaume Hilt
Le 05/08/2011 14:31, Tom Hendrikx a écrit :
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Which MySQL version is this?
>
> On 05/08/
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:50:30 +0200
Guillaume Hilt wrote:
> I have an issue on gentoo with dspam 3.10 (i just got released in portage).
> I followed the UPGRADE file and dspam mysql database is up to date but i
> have these issues, it looks like the queries are malformed :
>
> Aug 5 13:37:34 sr
I checked my conf and tried with the original one (from 3.8.0) and the
updated one (3.10.0) and the same errors occurs.
I switched back to the previous version for now.
Guillaume Hilt
Le 05/08/2011 13:50, Guillaume Hilt a écrit :
> I have an issue on gentoo with dspam 3.10 (i just got releas
Hi Guillaume,
Which MySQL version is this?
On 05/08/11 13:50, Guillaume Hilt wrote:
> I have an issue on gentoo with dspam 3.10 (i just got released in portage).
> I followed the UPGRADE file and dspam mysql database is up to date but i
> have these issues, it looks like the queries are malforme
I have an issue on gentoo with dspam 3.10 (i just got released in portage).
I followed the UPGRADE file and dspam mysql database is up to date but i
have these issues, it looks like the queries are malformed :
Aug 5 13:37:34 srv1 dspam[24278]: query error: You have an error in
your SQL syntax;
On 08/03/2011 01:52 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:54:28 -0600
> "Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
>
>> One more question, which I'm fairly certain of, but thought I would ask
>> anyway. This is a safe upgrade from 3.9 I presume? no changes to token
>> system that would force a user t
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:06:44 -0400
Julien Vehent wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:52:20 +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:54:28 -0600
> > "Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
> >
> >> One more question, which I'm fairly certain of, but thought I would
> >> ask
> >> anyway. This is a s
On 03/08/11 22:06, Julien Vehent wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:52:20 +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:54:28 -0600
>> "Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
>>
>>> One more question, which I'm fairly certain of, but thought I would
>>> ask
>>> anyway. This is a safe upgrade from 3.9 I p
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:52:20 +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:54:28 -0600
> "Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
>
>> One more question, which I'm fairly certain of, but thought I would
>> ask
>> anyway. This is a safe upgrade from 3.9 I presume? no changes to
>> token
>> system that w
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:54:28 -0600
"Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
> One more question, which I'm fairly certain of, but thought I would ask
> anyway. This is a safe upgrade from 3.9 I presume? no changes to token
> system that would force a user to dump the db and re-train?...
>
Might I ask you
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:45:25 -0700
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:25 AM +0200 Tom Hendrikx
> wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > More than one year after the previous release, the DSPAM team is happy
> > to anno
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:54:28 -0600
"Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
> One more question, which I'm fairly certain of, but thought I would
> ask anyway. This is a safe upgrade from 3.9 I presume? no changes to
> token system that would force a user to dump the db and re-train?...
Yes, no trouble.
-
One more question, which I'm fairly certain of, but thought I would ask
anyway. This is a safe upgrade from 3.9 I presume? no changes to token
system that would force a user to dump the db and re-train?...
--
BlackBerry®
On 08/01/2011 04:25 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello,
>
> More than one year after the previous release, the DSPAM team is happy
> to announce the long awaited release of DSPAM 3.10.0.
>
> Users running DSPAM 3.9.0, 3.9.1RC1 or some GIT version a
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:45:25 -0700
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:25 AM +0200 Tom Hendrikx
> wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > More than one year after the previous release, the DSPAM team is
> > happy to anno
--On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:25 AM +0200 Tom Hendrikx
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello,
>
> More than one year after the previous release, the DSPAM team is happy
> to announce the long awaited release of DSPAM 3.10.0.
What about IPv6 support?
--Quanah
27 matches
Mail list logo
