On 10/09/11 23:48, Steve Fatula wrote:
>
> Actually, no it's not opaque. To use POP, there are actually a few
> preferences they need to change. Signaturelocation would be one,
> subject prefix would be another so they can still see what is spam,
> and, the action has to be configured so they can
- Original Message -
> From: Tom Hendrikx
> To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 4:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Signature location enhancement request
>
> This way of solving your issue is very opaque to users. The
On 10/09/11 22:58, Steve Fatula wrote:
> Here's the issue. It would be nice if the user preference
> signatureLocation had one more option. The current choices are:
>
> headers - which puts it in the header only, great for imap users
> message - which puts it in header AND the body
>
> I would l
