On 05/02/2014 03:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.05.2014 19:06, schrieb Eric Shubert:
>> Just curious, are you using spamdyke (http://spamdyke.org)? IMO,
>> spamdyke is the best anti-spam software available. If I had to use only
>> one thing, it'd be spamdyke. Of course, I do use scanners a
I am hanging here since more than half a year but nothing is really happening.
A lot of mails of users who have problems with dspam are left unanswered. The
only person which was very useful and willing to help is Steven but it looks
like he is not hanging around anymore on this mailing list.
S
On 05/03/2014 01:06 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> Just curious, are you using spamdyke (http://spamdyke.org)? IMO,
> spamdyke is the best anti-spam software available. If I had to use only
> one thing, it'd be spamdyke. Of course, I do use scanners as well as
> spamdyke. Spamdyke rejects 80-90% of the
Am 02.05.2014 19:06, schrieb Eric Shubert:
> Just curious, are you using spamdyke (http://spamdyke.org)? IMO,
> spamdyke is the best anti-spam software available. If I had to use only
> one thing, it'd be spamdyke. Of course, I do use scanners as well as
> spamdyke. Spamdyke rejects 80-90% of
Just curious, are you using spamdyke (http://spamdyke.org)? IMO,
spamdyke is the best anti-spam software available. If I had to use only
one thing, it'd be spamdyke. Of course, I do use scanners as well as
spamdyke. Spamdyke rejects 80-90% of the spam up front though, so the
scanners have much
Am 02.05.2014 12:09, schrieb P.V.Anthony:
> On 05/02/2014 01:43 PM, ML mail wrote:
>
>> Any news? It's already quite a long time and it looks like this dspam
>> mailing list is dead... is the dspam project maybe also dead?
>
> I do not think dspam project is dead. It might be that list members
On 05/02/2014 01:43 PM, ML mail wrote:
> Any news? It's already quite a long time and it looks like this dspam
> mailing list is dead... is the dspam project maybe also dead?
I do not think dspam project is dead. It might be that list members are
busy.
Hang in there.
The list members are usual
Hi Stevan,
Any news? It's already quite a long time and it looks like this dspam mailing
list is dead... is the dspam project maybe also dead?
Regards
ML
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:10 PM, ML mail wrote:
Hi Stevan,
I was wondering if you already had time to start the small documentat
Hi Stevan,
I was wondering if you already had time to start the small documentation
on how to effectively use dspam in a non-homogenous multi-domain mail
hosting environment?
Let me know if there is anything I can help with.
RegardsML
P.S. it would be great if you could write back directly t
Hi Stevan,
I was wondering if you already had time to start the small documentation on how
to effectively use dspam in a non-homogenous multi-domain mail hosting
environment?
Let me know if there is anything I can help with.
Regards
ML
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 4:28 PM, Stevan Bajić w
Hi Stevan,
That's correct I use Dovecot and I have already setup its antispam plugin to
teach dspam this part works fine but still I would like to avoid to a maximum
users having to manually move the FP/FN into the respective IMAP folders (I
think here especially about lazy users or users who
On 04/02/2014 23:14, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> I could write a small docu how to setup that global user and how to
> train it. But I don't know when I have the time in the next days to do
> so. Let me know if you are interested and maybe if you could help me
> with it (my English is not the best).
I
Hi,
The same thing. We're successfully offer free anti-spam fitlering
service for our clients using separate dspam server in our ISP mail
(exim+dovecot) with virtual domains. In most cases accuracy of spam
detection more than 99%. So I definitely recommend it (but required good
configuration o
Hello ML,
you are right about the out of the box experience. A tool that is mainly
rule based like SpamAssassin has an advantage over DSPAM in the
beginning.
I have not the same opinion about groups as you. If you use a global
user and train it properly you will not have issues where one wou
Hi Stevan,
My main concern is that it does not work out of the box such as other anti-spam
tools like spamassassin. What I mean here is that dspam needs to go through a
phase of learning, which means that most of the users will receive for quite
some time a certain amount of spam in their inbox
Hello ML,
I use DSPAM in such an environment. Might I ask you why you think that
DSPAM is not the best choice for such an environment?
btw: personally I believe that nothing is the best choice. Everything is
good and bad.
--
Kind Regards from Switzerland,
Stevan Bajić
Am 2014-02-03 17:2
16 matches
Mail list logo
