880 vs 800 (was: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Signal Distance)

2009-05-16 Thread genedathe
John is right on the money here. - Tactical Call Sign SOP: A tactical call sign is entered in the 4 digit comment field after a station's legal call sign: MY: NAØG /EOC Such tactical calls can be readily pre-programmed in the MYCALL memory of most radios. With this procedure, your

Re: 880 vs 800 (was: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Signal Distance)

2009-05-16 Thread Tony Langdon
At 04:31 AM 5/16/2009, you wrote: Has anyone actually tried that? I could brush up on my Novell skills from 1992. Don't see why it wouldn't work. :) Never saw a more stable fileserver in my entire IT/telco professional career as a Novell 3.11 server. :-) I certainly can't argue with that

Re: 880 vs 800 (was: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Signal Distance)

2009-05-16 Thread Tony Langdon
At 01:50 PM 5/16/2009, you wrote: They each have their purpose, we just need better gateway software. Agreed. If implemented right, linking and callsign routing could coexist, if the software was written to allow this mix. In addition, controls to block either would be handy for certain uses.

Re: 880 vs 800 (was: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Signal Distance)

2009-05-16 Thread Tony Langdon
At 01:16 AM 5/17/2009, you wrote: John is right on the money here. - Tactical Call Sign SOP: A tactical call sign is entered in the 4 digit comment field after a station's legal call sign: This would seem to be the most sensible way. 73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL http://vkradio.com

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-16 Thread Dennis Griffin
I have worked many public service events disaster preparedness exercises. One would have to be very creative to get meaningful tactical calls with only 4 characters available. I'm often Lead, so that's fine, but how about all the numbered Aid Station, Event, Mobile, Safety, Bicycle,

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Tactical Call indication

2009-05-16 Thread John D. Hays
The 20 character message works very well and would be a good place to do Tactical if you need more than 4 chars. The issue for the callsign is that in D-STAR the callsign field is more than identification, it is part of the addressing scheme. Whereas in APRS you often are just reporting