Thanks for that, now I know. Not really my kind of music though.
Just waiting for the bus home.
Love Roger
XXX
-Original Message-
From: Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Sent: 17/05/2010 1:40:50 am
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: DSTAR newcomer FINISH
FWIW,
Whatever that was supposed to mean…
WM4B
From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of ovaltr...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:41 AM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] DSTAR newcomer FINISH
Thanks for
I only had 1 or 2 of the classic negative hams.
Ok what is a classic negative hams. do you mean people who have no intrest
or don't beleve the hype ?.
There are number of manufacturers making
equipment for D-STAR. We can make a non D-STAR radio a D-STAR radio, and we
now have approved
At 11:37 PM 5/16/2010, brad_k9mhz wrote:
My first D-STAR forum at Dayton, and it was probably one of the best
forums that I've ever seen at Dayton, on any topic. I think I'm going to
really enjoy this D-STAR gig.
Best,
Brad, K9MHZ
I'll take this opportunity for a crass commercial
My definition is one of those hams who just have to be negative about
everything. Just like those who didn't think that SSB would ever catch on, just
like those who didn't think that FM and repeaters were real amateur radio
because a repeater can lose power and go off the air.
The one
And might I saw what awesome, professional videos they are!
Ed WA4YIH
From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Gary Pearce KN4AQ
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 7:25 AM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com; dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re:
The one question that I got referred to a mistaken concept that D-STAR was a
closed protocol. We explained that the D-STAR protocol is open and defined by
the JARL. Sitting right next to us was Internet Labs with the DVDongle and
DVAP and David with his non-Icom repeater, great examples of
You mean my Bc-348, Arc-3 or scr-522 is not state of the art ? Your morning
chuckle go look at my station photo on QRZ,COM .
But ... your right some never change . your point is now understood .
My definition is one of those hams who just have to be negative about
everything.
How many manufacturers have the code for their microprocessors published?
Yes it is the same thing. Over the air is published, while a number of off
the air items aren't published. I'd really like to get into the source code of
some of my radios and change the way it does things, but I can't.
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren't open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where can one find information on them?
Did they publish
Nate,
Nope, they aren't readily available for you to read. Did you see that written
anywhere in what I said? Did you see me publish a URL to it?
But if you would do a little legwork and reading, you'll find that indeed, the
hotspots access the DPlus network and that the G4ULF repeater is
On May 17, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Nate Duehr wrote:
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren’t open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where
At 03:57 AM 5/18/2010, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren't open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
This also has precedent. The exact same thing happened with
Echolink,
At 05:22 AM 5/18/2010, you wrote:
But if you would do a little legwork and reading, you'll find that
indeed, the hotspots access the DPlus network and that the G4ULF
repeater is accessing the G2 network.
I think Nate is asking for the results of the reverse engineering,
not (closed)
On 5/17/2010 1:22 PM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Nope, they aren't readily available for you to read. Did you see that
written anywhere in what I said? Did you see me publish a URL to it?
That's all I asked. Thank you for confirming that the answer is no, and
that D-STAR development is as
Nate,
Take a deep breath, climb down off your high horse and find something else
to do! You critical, repetitive comments add nothing to the group.
If you dislike D-Star, or wish it was something else, why don't you go and
create that something else?
It is what it is, and it will always be
On 5/17/2010 1:51 PM, John Hays wrote:
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren’t open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where can one
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 05:31:49PM -0400, Ted Wrobel wrote:
Take a deep breath, climb down off your high horse and find something else
to do! You critical, repetitive comments add nothing to the group.
If you dislike D-Star, or wish it was something else, why don't you go and
create that
Nate,
D-STAR Development is NOT CLOSED!
The D-STAR air protocol is published.
The network that Icom created is proprietary, but there's nothing that says
that it is the only network that can be used. Go look at the stuff that Scott
and the X-Trust server team has created. I believe that most
For Sale: IC-91AD Complete Package
Icom IC-91AD Radio (includes UT-121 D-STAR module)
HM-131 Speaker-Mic with Earphone Jack
BC-139 Drop-In Rapid Charger
LC-163 Carry Case
(2) BP-217 Lithium Ion Battery Packs 7.4V 1300 mAh
RS-91 Remote Control Windows Software (includes OPC-1529 serial PC cable)
Unless you're getting out of amateur radio completely, I'd think twice about
selling my IC-91AD. Aside from the D-Star capabilities, there is no other
amateur handheld that can come even remotely close to the performance of the
IC-91AD, especially the receive performance.
73,
Scott, N9AA
---
21 matches
Mail list logo
