I like to see the 3 band ,too.
ut one question to the group: HT 1,2 GHZ 1 Watt or more on 7 -9 db antenna
,is the ERP not already a little Danger for your Eyes?
My 1,2 GHZ repeater has a 14.9 DB Commet Antenna,she scares me already,I
havve a 90 Watt Amp on 1,2 GHZ for the DD.But not installed
A few comments about 23 cm. I used to operate an analog 23 cm repeater. It
was located at the same (urban) site as a 440 repeater. They got almost
identical coverage. Obstructions are problem for 23 cm. A brick wall can
literally be
a brick wall for a 23 cm signal. But, as several people
On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Peter Scherp wrote:
I like to see the 3 band ,too.
ut one question to the group: HT 1,2 GHZ 1 Watt or more on 7 -9 db
antenna
,is the ERP not already a little Danger for your Eyes?
My 1,2 GHZ repeater has a 14.9 DB Commet Antenna,she scares me
already,I
On Jan 31, 2009, at 6:47 AM, genedathe wrote:
Thanks for the comments, Nate.
I'm just stirring the pot here for fun.
Totally understandable. I've NEVER done that. ;-)
I see 1.2DV as nothing new, as I have many radios that reach repeaters
now...
Also understand. The issue here might
Gene,
I personally don't know if it is reporting DD vs DV - but it does give
an indication that 23cm is being used.
genedathe wrote:
John, I'm confused; by searching as you suggest, does that tell me if
the activity was DV or DD? How do you distinguish? Thanks!
73 de NAØG Gene
-
--
On the W1KK system we recently upgraded the 23cm
duplexer to be a triplexer. And we've got a new
antenna and a couple of hundred feet of 1 5/8
that will be going up as soon as the WX permits.
With decent HAAT 23cm plays quite well ...
not much different than 33cm and we have a lot
of new 33cm
If anyone has successfully put a PA or a preamp on a DD box or an ID-1
running DD, please post to this list - Buddy WB4OMG
On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Peter Scherp wrote:
have a 90 Watt Amp on 1,2 GHZ for the DD.But not installed yet.
**
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
: Friday, January 30, 2009 10:00 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: {Disarmed} [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: ICOM announced new hand-held and
mobile D-STAR transceivers, ID-80 and ID-880
How many of you repeater owners have an active 1.2 DV repeater on the
air? Do you see any actual use?
I'm curious
FIRST OF ALL, DO NOT INSTALL AN AMP ON THE DD BOX!!
Your going to save some headaches by not doing that...
there are no amps out there that can switch fast enough
for the DD boxes ask the Michigan group, been there done
that, the own the shirts!
For Voice, go ahead, we added a preamp to the
To: dstar digital dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:06:56 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: ICOM announced new hand-held and mobile D-STAR
transceivers, ID-80 and ID-880
Hi John:
I had a Japanese translator do a little
http://dstarusers.org/ == check the Reporting Node for A --- you'll
see some activity.
On Jan 30, 2009, at 7:00 PM, genedathe wrote:
How many of you repeater owners have an active 1.2 DV repeater on the
air? Do you see any actual use?
John Hays
Amateur Radio: K7VE
j...@hays.org
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:00:05 PM
Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: ICOM announced new hand-held and mobile D-STAR
transceivers, ID-80 and ID-880
How many of you repeater owners have an active 1.2 DV repeater on the
air? Do you see any actual use?
I'm curious about this because
Still no three-band mobile or handheld.
Have to go with Kenwood TM-741 and Satoshi's DV Adapter then to be able
to talk D-STAR on all three bands.
Erik
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: ICOM announced new hand-held and mobile
D-STAR transceivers, ID-80 and ID-880
Still no three-band mobile or handheld.
Have to go with Kenwood TM-741 and Satoshi's DV Adapter then to be able
to talk D-STAR on all three bands.
Erik
[Non-text portions
Hey, this is all so cool.
Where are all you guys finding out about this stuff? I don't see anything on
the web site!
For pictures of my mobile station, go to this link:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2630240
Scott Heath (AF4KK)
...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of larry allen
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:36 AM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: ICOM announced new hand-held and mobile
D-STAR transceivers, ID-80 and ID-880
Greetings...
Sorry for not being more 'up to date' myself
Nate,
Could you give a pointer as to the page on the FCC web site that gives this
info.
Thanks
Peter
[See message 6652]
Message -
From: john_ke5c k...@hot.rr.com
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:47
Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: ICOM announced new hand-held and mobile D-STAR
transceivers, ID-80 and ID-880
for those of you who were able to read that page did the usability
I would suspect, based on the 92AD, that it's GPS-in-the-Mike
especially since the mike is also supposed to display GPS info
(Buddy's friend's translation: The hand-held ID80 comes with an
optional GPS mike that displays the user's
current position and sends that information to the other
: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: ICOM announced new hand-held and mobile D-STAR
transceivers, ID-80 and ID-880
I would suspect, based on the 92AD, that it's GPS-in-the-Mike
especially since the mike is also supposed to display GPS info
(Buddy's friend's translation: The hand-held ID80 comes with an
optional GPS mike
://www.mountainsunsets.com
From: John Hays j...@hays.org
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 12:33:26 PM
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: ICOM announced new hand-held and
mobile D-STAR transceivers, ID-80 and ID-880
I would
21 matches
Mail list logo
