On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:36:30PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 02:25:02PM -0800, Brendan Gregg - Sun Microsystems
wrote:
proc = procedure
Yes, proc sounds too much like process; however procedure sounds like
something new I didn't know about in NFSv4.
On Nov 19, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Brendan Gregg - Sun Microsystems wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:36:30PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 02:25:02PM -0800, Brendan Gregg - Sun
Microsystems wrote:
proc = procedure
Yes, proc sounds too much like process; however
On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:20:02PM -0600, Spencer Shepler wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:58:19PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:53:59AM -0800, Adam Leventhal wrote:
probe name
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:58:19PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:53:59AM -0800, Adam Leventhal wrote:
probe name args[2]
-- ---
nfsv4:::compound-op-start
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:43:07PM -0600, Spencer Shepler wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
Does 4.1 differ so much from 4 that the provider name itself must
differ?
That's funny. Yes.
How funny is it? Will we want to support both the nfsv4 and nfsv41
On Nov 16, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:58:19PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:53:59AM -0800, Adam Leventhal wrote:
probe name args[2]
-- ---
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:20:02PM -0600, Spencer Shepler wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:58:19PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:53:59AM -0800, Adam Leventhal wrote:
probe name args[2]
-- ---
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:53:05PM -0800, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:20:02PM -0600, Spencer Shepler wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:58:19PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
(I.e., drop the op- in the client-server compound direction.)
We chose to include 'op-'
Note that the READDIR operation is missing from the list below.
Given that these protocol mechanisms will exist at client and
server, it would be helpful to have a naming mechanism that
differentiated this fact. I also assume that when NFSv4.1
is introduced that the provider will be expanded to
On Nov 15, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 03:03:15PM -0600, Spencer Shepler wrote:
Given that these protocol mechanisms will exist at client and
server, it would be helpful to have a naming mechanism that
differentiated this fact.
Perhaps the module name
10 matches
Mail list logo
