Re: [DuMuX] BC apparently not respected

2019-07-16 Thread Timo Koch
On 16.07.19 12:13, lc wrote: Hello, Maybe this helps to understand what I’m talking about. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_working_example In particular, “The important feature of a minimal working example is that it is as small and as simple as possible, such that it is just

Re: [DuMuX] BC apparently not respected

2019-07-16 Thread Timo Koch
Am 16.07.2019 um 10:24 schrieb lc mailto:lorenzo.camp...@uniroma1.it>>: Hello On 16.07.2019 10:22, Timo Koch wrote: please post a minimal working example to reproduce the behaviour. Also, we need to know what you are computing, what is the outcome, what is the expected outcome and why you

Re: [DuMuX] BC apparently not respected

2019-07-16 Thread Timo Koch
> Am 16.07.2019 um 08:55 schrieb lc : > > Hello Timo, > > thanks for your answer. > > Since, I'm working with Dumux 2.12 I cannot say anything about 1) or 2). > > So, for the moment, I attach al the material necessary to replicate the > behaviour that I get on Dumux 2.12, at least to

Re: [DuMuX] BC apparently not respected

2019-07-16 Thread lc
Hello Timo, thanks for your answer. Since, I'm working with Dumux 2.12 I cannot say anything about 1) or 2). So, for the moment, I attach al the material necessary to replicate the behaviour that I get on Dumux 2.12, at least to understand if it is a bug, my implementation mistake or should