Review: Needs Information
hey Stefan,
wrt.
1.
can be disregarded if the other backend will be replaced completely
2.
yepp.. overlooked that. don't mind my comment there.
3. and 4.
same as 1.
additionally..
there were concerns when adding the Dropbox backend wrt. the trademark so it
was added
Review: Approve
hey Stefan,
out of interest. what is meant by
"
109 +# NOTE: Amazon requires https, which is why I am using my
domain/setup
110 +# instead of Duplicity's. Mail me at stefan-duplic...@breunig.xyz
once it is
111 +# available through https and I will
Review: Needs Fixing
hey Nils,
looks good, but please add the new parameter to the man page /bin/duplicity.1
as well. no use to have a parameter that is not properly documented.
thanks.. ede
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~dernils/duplicity/robust-dropbox-backend/+merge/311073
Your team
Question #404141 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/404141
edso posted a new comment:
hey Matt, thanks for sharing your experience.. ede/duply.net
--
You received this question notification because your team duplicity-team
is an answer contact for Duplicity
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~dernils/duplicity/robust-dropbox-backend/+merge/311073
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
Post to :
Review: Needs Fixing
close, but your missing the parameter eg.
.BI "--backend-retry-delay " number
..ede
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~dernils/duplicity/robust-dropbox-backend/+merge/311073
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
Question #404018 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/404018
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 12.11.2016 16:37, nils wrote:
> New question #404018 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #404018 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/404018
edso proposed the following answer:
On 13.11.2016 16:17, nils wrote:
> Question #404018 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/404018
>
> nils posted a
edso has proposed merging lp:~ed.so/duplicity/manpage.fixes into lp:duplicity.
Requested reviews:
duplicity-team (duplicity-team)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/manpage.fixes/+merge/311405
fix html output via rman on the website
--
Your team duplicity-team
Question #404071 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/404071
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 14.11.2016 20:23, Armin Schindler wrote:
> New question #404071 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
Question #404018 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/404018
edso proposed the following answer:
On 14.11.2016 22:02, nils wrote:
> Question #404018 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/404018
>
> nils posted a
Question #404018 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/404018
edso proposed the following answer:
On 15.11.2016 14:17, nils wrote:
> Question #404018 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/404018
>
> nils posted a
Question #403594 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/403594
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 31.10.2016 19:32, Eric Christensen wrote:
> Question #403594 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/
Ken, Havard,
any reason why the backend did not get documented in the man page?
how are users to know it is there and how it works?
..ede/duply.net
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~havard/duplicity/jottacloudbackend/+merge/304955
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
Question #402905 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/402905
edso posted a new comment:
On 01.11.2016 13:38, juniorfga wrote:
> Question #402905 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/402905
>
> Status: Op
Question #402919 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/402919
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 03.11.2016 19:58, John wrote:
> Question #402919 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #403594 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/403594
Status: Open => Needs information
edso requested more information:
ok, it should be in there ;)
let's start using bigger guns now. please send/pastebin/mail me
personally (as you prefer)
On 05.12.2016 21:37, Will Storey wrote:
> Thank you, that is a lot clearer!
that's the idea ;) ..ede
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~horgh/duplicity/copy-symlink-targets-721599/+merge/312438
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
nP. but please change the man page text to
+.B --copy-links
+Resolve symlinks during backup.
+Enabling this will resolve & back up the symlink's file/folder data instead of
the symlink itself, potentially increasing the size of the backup.
just want to make sure users understand the
Question #577611 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/577611
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 20.03.2017 20:28, Jasper wrote:
> New question #577611 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #601449 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/601449
edso proposed the following answer:
On 03.04.2017 00:03, GilgongoJones wrote:
> Question #601449 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/601449
>
> Gilgon
Question #601449 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/601449
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 01.04.2017 08:33, GilgongoJones wrote:
> Question #601449 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
Question #654243 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/654243
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
hi Adam,
On 31.07.2017 02:03, Adam Dobrawy wrote:
> New question #654243 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/
Question #653959 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/653959
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
answers inline
On 27.07.2017 21:03, baldwintm wrote:
> New question #653959 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/
Question #655698 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/655698
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 10.08.2017 06:44, Sivanath wrote:
> New question #655698 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #654413 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/654413
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 31.07.2017 22:03, Frank Bicknell wrote:
> New question #654413 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
Question #654413 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/654413
edso proposed the following answer:
hey Frank,
On 01.08.2017 17:09, Frank Bicknell wrote:
> Question #654413 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/654413
>
Question #631423 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/631423
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
Howie, i don't see the attachment?! ..ede/duply.net
On 10.05.2017 22:57, Howard Kaye wrote:
> Question #631423 on Duplicity c
Question #631423 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/631423
edso proposed the following answer:
hey guys,
that looks wrong. using os.tmpfile() may resolve the issue, but it
removes the users control, where the temp files are created. this comes
up on list list
Question #631423 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/631423
edso posted a new comment:
nice catch Howie!
wonder why this worked with os.tmpfile() but not with
tempfile.TemporaryFile() before though.. ede/duply.net
On 16.05.2017 20:33, Howard Kaye wrote
Question #631423 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/631423
edso posted a new comment:
Howie, Ken,
would you agree then, that the whole os.tmpfile() exception
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/duplicity/0.8-series/view/head:/duplicity/patchdir.py
Question #640874 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/640874
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On June 6, 2017 10:46:51 AM GMT+02:00, Abhijit Sasmal
<question640...@answers.launchpad.net> wrote:
>Question #640874
Question #631423 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/631423
edso proposed the following answer:
On 05.05.2017 20:13, Howard Kaye wrote:
> New question #631423 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/631423
>
> In te
Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658091
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 9/18/2017 20:53, ardabro wrote:
> Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #657939 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/657939
edso posted a new comment:
On 9/20/2017 22:34, ardabro wrote:
> Question #657939 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/657939
>
> Status: Answer
Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658091
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 9/20/2017 22:23, ardabro wrote:
> Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658091
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
ardabro,
your command line looks like
> Args: /usr/bin/duplicity full --name=test_backup --encrypt-key=DEADBEEF
> --sign-key
Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658091
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 9/15/2017 22:14, ardabro wrote:
> Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658091
edso proposed the following answer:
On 9/15/2017 22:04, ardabro wrote:
> New question #658091 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658091
>
> Hi
> When i us
Question #657939 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/657939
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
you can!
using a recent duplicity it will ignore (whule still
needed) and simply check if the backup is restorable.. ede/duply.
Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658091
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 9/17/2017 18:09, ardabro wrote:
> Question #658091 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
edso proposed the following answer:
On 8/29/2017 21:33, Martin wrote:
> Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
>
> Martin
Question #657939 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/657939
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 9/12/2017 22:58, ardabro wrote:
> New question #657939 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #658653 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658653
edso proposed the following answer:
Siva,
are you sure that this is caused by the version upgrade? maybe it is
coincidental? i would try two things.
1. make sure that nothing lingers in your ram
Question #658832 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658832
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 02.10.2017 08:54, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> New question #658832 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
Question #658832 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658832
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 02.10.2017 11:53, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> Question #658832 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/
Question #658832 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658832
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 02.10.2017 12:44, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> Question #658832 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/
Question #658832 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658832
edso proposed the following answer:
On 02.10.2017 08:54, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> New question #658832 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658832
>
> Hi
Question #452086 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/452086
edso proposed the following answer:
On 9/27/2017 20:53, CJ Niemira wrote:
> Question #452086 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/452086
>
> CJ Niem
Question #658653 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658653
edso proposed the following answer:
Ken,
1.
can you pinpoint a version, when that happend? so we can suggest users to stick
w/ it until this is solved in a future release?
2.
manifests are still one
Question #658653 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/658653
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
Siva,
also these tickets might be of help
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/270906
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
Martin,
there are multiple calls to backend.pre_process_download() in
bin/duplicity. so it might make sense to rework BackendWrap
Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
edso proposed the following answer:
On 25.08.2017 15:47, Martin wrote:
> Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
>
> Martin
Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
edso proposed the following answer:
On 25.08.2017 15:18, Martin wrote:
> Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
>
> Martin
Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
edso proposed the following answer:
On 25.08.2017 16:43, Martin wrote:
> Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
>
> Martin
Question #656947 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/656947
edso proposed the following answer:
On 25.08.2017 18:33, Martin wrote:
> Martin posted a new comment:
> It does not work with "key", it is necessary to create key2.
Martin, did you t
Question #659626 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/659626
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 19.10.2017 08:28, Jasper wrote:
> Question #659626 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Review: Needs Fixing
hi,
that workaround looks fishy to me. it will also mask other ListFolderErrors,
even ones with a proper cause, that the user needs to see to take appropriate
action.
can you dig into the error and find out the detailed error, so you might only
ignore this specific
The proposal to merge lp:~crosser/duplicity/dpbx-fix-file-listing into
lp:duplicity has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~crosser/duplicity/dpbx-fix-file-listing/+merge/334274
--
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to
Question #660463 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/660463
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 11/11/2017 14:53, Konstantin Schubert wrote:
> Question #660463 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/
Question #660695 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/660695
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 13.11.2017 16:57, Camille wrote:
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/gzip.py", line 236, in write
>
Question #660704 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/660704
Status: Open => Invalid
edso rejected the question:
Spam
--
You received this question notification because your team duplicity-team
is an answer contact for Duplic
Question #668566 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/668566
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 5/4/2018 0:17, nicholas wrote:
> New question #668566 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #668671 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/668671
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 5/6/2018 13:03, Rebecca wrote:
> Question #668671 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #668671 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/668671
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 08.05.2018 13:33, Rebecca wrote:
> Question #668671 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #669105 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/669105
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 16.05.2018 17:52, Battant wrote:
SNIP
> TotalDestinationSizeChange 0 (0 bytes)
> Errors 219
>
> Question : w
Question #670362 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/670362
edso proposed the following answer:
On 21.06.2018 10:57, edso wrote:
> paramiko is a python native ssh implementation and as such does not support
> the same parameters
ok, that's misl
Question #668404 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/668404
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 30.04.2018 02:52, Tim wrote:
> New question #668404 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/66840
Question #668404 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/668404
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 30.04.2018 11:22, Tim wrote:
> Question #668404 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #668404 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/668404
edso proposed the following answer:
On 30.04.2018 11:22, Tim wrote:
> Tim is still having a problem:
> Yes, atime is a filesystem feature. But it is possible to
> programatically read
Question #659626 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/659626
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
from the manpage http://duplicity.nongnu.org/duplicity.1.html
"
verify [--compare-data] [--time ] [--file-to-restore ]
Question #659626 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/659626
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 20.10.2017 14:33, Jasper wrote:
> Question #659626 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
On 1/21/2018 12:19, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> Thanks for the catch! Not sure how it got deleted.
>
hey,
had a quick look just to find our where it got missing and _couldn't find_ a
point where it existed earlier. checked
ahhh.. makes sense, thanks for clearing this up!.. ede
On 1/21/2018 13:21, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> All in series-8 - it was added in rev 1209 to support replicate, then
> removed in 1251 by accident.
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 5:42 AM, edso <edgar.sol...@web.de> wrote:
Question #664091 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/664091
edso proposed the following answer:
as always,
if you want/need this functionality you are welcome to contribute these
changes. or maybe sponsor the the development by offering a bounty?
..ede
Question #664503 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/664503
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 2/17/2018 0:02, Dan Jaenecke wrote:
> My OS: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS
> Version of duplicity: 0.7.06
hey Dan,
plea
Question #664503 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/664503
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
Dan,
can you check if the gio files
https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/amd64/python-gi/filelist
exist on your box?
would
Question #664503 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/664503
edso proposed the following answer:
On 2/18/2018 12:33, Dan Jaenecke wrote:
> $ PYTHONPATH=/opt/duplicity/lib/python2.7/site-packages
> /opt/duplicity/bin/duplicity -V
> duplici
Question #664503 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/664503
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 2/18/2018 13:12, Dan Jaenecke wrote:
> And yes, I *could* stop using deja-dup, but it is really convenient and I'd
&g
Question #670964 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/670964
edso posted a new comment:
hey Kakurady,
just want to reemphasize the necessity of a verify(s) if you really want
to be sure that your restored chain(s) are truely proper!
..ede/duply.net
--
You
question. does it really make sense to adorn singular strings meant as a code
comment only eg.
class GlobbingError(Exception):
-"""Something has gone wrong when parsing a glob string"""
+u"""Something has gone wrong when parsing a glob string"""
pass
..ede
--
Question #670964 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/670964
edso posted a new comment:
Ken,
looks more like
"
AssertionError: ({1:
'duplicity-inc.20180614T072154Z.to.20180615T072208Z.vol1.difftar.gz'},
'duplicity-inc.20180614T07215
Question #670964 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/670964
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
sounds exactly like Bug #1652410 therefor i linked it. should probably
at lest turned into a meaningful error message.
wrt. y
Question #670964 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/670964
Linked to bug: #1652410
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652410
"Undescriptive duplicity/collection-status error when the backup directory
contains two volumes with different file names
hey Snow,
nice of you to have added the documentation already in the manpage. +1.. ede
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~excitablesnowball/duplicity/s3-onezone-ia/+merge/348941
Your team duplicity-team is requested to review the proposed merge of
lp:~excitablesnowball/duplicity/s3-onezone-ia into
On 24.04.2018 18:20, Martin Nowak wrote:
> What's the corruption scenario that manifest comparison should protect
> against?
>
> The manifest contains volume checksums, but those aren't checked against the
> volumes.
they should, at least during verify/restore
> Eventually the remote manifest
hey Martin,
while the patch looks sound, i'd really like to know why the manifest is
retrieved/decrypted from backend in the first place, before it get's applied.
@Ken?
..ede/duply.net
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~dawgfoto/duplicity/fixup1252/+merge/343816
Your team duplicity-team is
hey Martin,
are you aware of the "no private key issue/double key approach" as eg.
described here
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2017-10/msg00015.html
?
On 23.04.2018 15:50, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Seems like it tries to catch corruptions see
>
Question #674847 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/674847
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 08.10.2018 14:37, Eric Christensen wrote:
> New question #674847 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/
Question #674425 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/674425
edso posted a new comment:
Clemens,
this is fixed in trunk but unreleased so far
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/duplicity/0.7-series/revision/1365
feel free to manually patch 0.7.18
Review: Approve
nice catch. one wonders what the original author thought. thx! ..ede/duply.net
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~mcuelenaere/duplicity/duplicity/+merge/358411
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
___
Mailing
Question #674425 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/674425
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 28.09.2018 00:17, BenRifkah Bergsten-Buret wrote:
> Question #674425 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/
Question #674425 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/674425
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 26.09.2018 02:07, BenRifkah Bergsten-Buret wrote:
> New question #674425 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/
Question #677428 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/677428
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 22.01.2019 04:57, trevj wrote:
> Question #677428 on Duplicity changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Question #677428 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/677428
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
Trevorj,
as '--ignore-errors' did not help. let's try something else.
1.
can gunzip all files and capture the output '> log.tx
Question #676836 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/676836
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
symmetric encryption is already the default, if no key is given.
fronm the man page section env vars
"
PASSPHRASE
This pa
Question #676995 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/676995
edso proposed the following answer:
and it's not only the backend infrastructure.
currently backup file creation (volumes, manifest ...) is also running
in the same thread, meaning a volume is created
Question #677428 on Duplicity changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/677428
Status: Open => Answered
edso proposed the following answer:
On 10.01.2019 07:28, trevj wrote:
> New question #677428 on Duplicity:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+questi
Review: Approve
looks good to me.. ede/duply.net
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~okrasz/duplicity/duplicity/+merge/361352
Your team duplicity-team is subscribed to branch lp:duplicity.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team
Post to
Review: Needs Fixing
hi,
looks good overall. small nitbits though..
1.
please insert the manpage entry where it is alphabetically correct.
2.
manpage text. "storring" can be removed -> 'Standard storage tier used for
backup files (Hot|Cool|Archive).'
thanks!.. ede/duply.net
--
401 - 500 of 553 matches
Mail list logo
