Re: [Duplicity-team] [Question #150909]: reverse diffs

2011-04-01 Thread ceg
Question #150909 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909 Status: Answered = Open ceg is still having a problem: uh, so duplicity is no chunky bacon. ;-) Doing unnecessary full backups of hundreds of GB if only a couple MB have changed is just too

Re: [Duplicity-team] [Question #150909]: reverse diffs

2011-03-30 Thread ceg
Question #150909 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909 Status: Answered = Open ceg is still having a problem: Thanks for your reply edso! From man rdiff-backup (just for the casual reader): The target directory ends up a copy (mirror) of the

Re: [Duplicity-team] [Question #150909]: reverse diffs

2011-03-30 Thread edso
Question #150909 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909 Status: Open = Answered edso proposed the following answer: On 30.03.2011 10:08, ceg wrote: Question #150909 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909

[Duplicity-team] [Question #150909]: reverse diffs

2011-03-29 Thread ceg
New question #150909 on Duplicity: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909 Could duplicity keep reverse diffs, so the latest backup does not depnend on an old backkup plus a chain of diffs? -- You received this question notification because you are a member of duplicity-team,

Re: [Duplicity-team] [Question #150909]: reverse diffs

2011-03-29 Thread edso
Question #150909 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909 Status: Open = Answered edso proposed the following answer: On 29.03.2011 17:14, ceg wrote: New question #150909 on Duplicity: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909 Could

Re: [Duplicity-team] [Question #150909]: reverse diffs

2011-03-29 Thread ceg
Question #150909 on Duplicity changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/duplicity/+question/150909 Status: Answered = Open ceg is still having a problem: merge older full/diffs into a new full I guess that is only part of what rdiff-backup does (on the remote site). I'd like duplicity to keep