Upgrade to hg tip, 4.9 will be there very soon and have a look
to DEFGEOM in config.def.h.
To hide the bar, you could do:
DEFGEOM(nobar, -bw, 0, sw, 0, 0, sw, sh, wx, wy, 0.55*sw, wh, mx+mw, wy,
ww-mw, wh, wx, wy, ww, wh)
and a new geoms entry:
{ ||, nobar },
and a shortcut
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:15:30AM +0100, Nibble wrote:
Finally, I have included the next Geoms in my config.h (dual screen setup:
virtual 2048x768):
/* Single screen */
DEFGEOM(single, 0, 0, sw, 0, bh, sw, sh-bh, wx, wy, MWFACT*sw, wh, mx+mw,
wy, ww-mw, wh, wx, wy, ww, wh)
/* Dual
off the topic, are you a freebsd user? Does your dwm work well in freebsd?
I've encounter some problem when switch between dwm and consoles, some
times this type of switch will let dwm quit but xorg-server, I have to
kill the xorg.
--
Reguards,
anhnmncb.
PGP key: 44A31344
pgpaIggw8oXxX.pgp
On 3/19/08, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is:
void
configurenotify(XEvent *e) {
XConfigureEvent *ev = e-xconfigure;
if(ev-window == root (ev-width != sw || ev-height != sh)) {
sw = ev-width;
sh = ev-height;
setgeom(NULL);
}
}
This event handler is invoked
2008/3/19, Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
what's wrong with
void growm(const char *arg) {
mw += 20;
}
?
shouldn't it be
void growm(const char *arg) {
mw += 20;
setgeom(NULL);
}
?
But yes, I think this would be the right thing to do. This way we can
even have a check to not
On 3/19/08, yy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shouldn't it be
void growm(const char *arg) {
mw += 20;
setgeom(NULL);
}
?
imho lt-arrange(); + necessary checks should be enough there
On 3/19/08, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it's not very general. If you use bottom stack, then
growm() should touch mh, th and ty instead. With DEFGEOM this is
possible already. Having a growm() function like your proposal
is too limited in my opinion.
the idea is that in
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/19/08, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it's not very general. If you use bottom stack, then
growm() should touch mh, th and ty instead. With DEFGEOM this is
possible already. Having a growm() function like
Well there is one ugly thing to note about the shrinkmaster and
growmaster proposal I did some days ago, which I heavily dislike
and that's why I also don't propose to keep them as an official
feature.
The problem is:
void
configurenotify(XEvent *e) {
XConfigureEvent *ev =
On 3/19/08, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I care only about what should be mainstream and what not. And I
think you understand my reasons why I won't like those oneliners
being mainstream, if we already have DEFGEOM.
now that
int bx, by, bw, bh, blw, bgw, mx, my, mw, mh, mox, moy,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:44 AM, John Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- For a short while, I experimented with using the floating layout as my
default layout. It was actually kind of interesting. The main
advantage of it: it adds a certain kind of predictability when
adding/removing tags
pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You missed the bar
DEFGEOM(bottom, 0, 0, sw, 0, bh, sw, sh-bh, wx, wy, sw, 0.70*wh,
wx, mh+bh, ww, wh-mh, wx, wy, ww, wh)
Thanks for the fix.
-- dtm
12 matches
Mail list logo
