Hi,
I'm using the latest dwm version from the repository and I noticed the
following behaviour when switching between vertical and horizontal
tiling.
When in vertical tiling mode and then pressing mod-h and then repeatedly
pressing mod-h the tiling toggles between horizontal and vertical. The
On 3/21/08, Anthony Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pressing mod-h the tiling toggles between horizontal and vertical. The
same can be done with mod-v. From the function names in config.h I
assume this is not the intended behaviour?
intended: allows to toggle between current and last layout
i
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 09:37:26AM +0100, Anthony Brown wrote:
When in vertical tiling mode and then pressing mod-h and then repeatedly
pressing mod-h the tiling toggles between horizontal and vertical. The
same can be done with mod-v. From the function names in config.h I
assume this is not
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:43:20AM -0400, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 09:37:26AM +0100, Anthony Brown wrote:
When in vertical tiling mode and then pressing mod-h and then repeatedly
pressing mod-h the tiling toggles between horizontal and vertical. The
same can be done
I'll summarize what's in that attachment.
I made six DEFGEOMs: rightstack bottomstack, monocle, both with and without
the bar.
cyclegeom: alt-space cycles through the three, either with or without the bar.
togglebar: alt-b switches between two of them as you would expect.
setmwfact: I used
When only one client is in a workspace (or tagset, or view),
it could be borderless.
In the default geom, or in bottomstack, the border is unnecessary.
In my favorite monocle, any border would remind that something is
below.
_
2008/3/21, Ralph E. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When only one client is in a workspace (or tagset, or view),
it could be borderless.
In the default geom, or in bottomstack, the border is unnecessary.
In my favorite monocle, any border would remind that something is
below.
That's a good
Ralph E. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When only one client is in a workspace (or tagset, or view),
it could be borderless.
In the default geom, or in bottomstack, the border is unnecessary.
In my favorite monocle, any border would remind that something is
below.
No.
The border says:
On 3/21/08, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But anyway, special corner case handling leads to bad code. It
conflicts with generality, which is one of the design principles.
if you look into the code then you will realise that the 'one tiled
client' case is handled specially anyway
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:49:18 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dwm@suckless.org
Subject: Re: [dwm] a lone client could be borderless
On 3/21/08, markus schnalke wrote:
But anyway, special corner case handling leads to bad code. It
conflicts with generality, which is one of the design
vamosaverlas:
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:49:18 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dwm@suckless.org
Subject: Re: [dwm] a lone client could be borderless
On 3/21/08, markus schnalke wrote:
But anyway, special corner case handling leads to bad code. It
conflicts with generality,
11 matches
Mail list logo
