thanks a lot. I'll forward this to central IT (which
control the mail server).
joerg
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 05:53:23PM +0100, Premysl Hruby wrote:
On (06/03/09 17:24), Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Joerg van den Hoff j.van_den_h...@fzd.de
Subject
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:17:26PM -0700, Neale Pickett wrote:
Premysl Hruby dfe...@gmail.com writes:
I had saved one bounce message mlmmj received from your MX, and it
looks like your MX is acting very strangely (bounce message attached
to this email).
thanks for looking into this.
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Premysl Hruby wrote:
On (07/03/09 11:50), Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
Cc: Premysl Hruby dfe...@gmail.com
From: Joerg van den Hoff j.van_den_h...@fzd.de
Subject: Re: [dwm] [dwm+ow...@suckless.org: Messages from dwm
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 09:35:43AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/5/09, Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com wrote:
7587 messages: Starting Wed Jul 19 2006 - 06:39:23 UTC, Ending Thu Mar
05 2009 - 08:03:46 UTC
so i wonder which is the no. 7600 if there is only 7538..
7587
(sorry)
hi,
I still get sporadically (about once a week) messages
of this kind. our sysadmin tells me that he can't
see any mails rejected by our server.
I now want to check _which_ messages exactly have bounced (if
at all). question: how can I identify the mail in the
mail archive from the message
hi there,
some days ago I've started to receive mails
like the attached one (about 3 up to now).
so I have a few questions:
-- does anybody else see this?
-- what exactly does the message mean (list of bounced messages: 7257)?
-- is this a problem upstream on the mailing list machine or
a
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:53:35PM -0500, James Turner wrote:
Epic fail on the diff, left some stuff in there that shouldn't be. Try
the new attached one.
I did: works perfectly. thanks a lot, this is really appreciated.
best regards,
joerg
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
hi,
I want to be able to cycle through all tags using some key combination
(instead of explicitely jumping to tag no. xxx).
in 4.9 someone on this list helped me getting this right:
void
goto_nexttag(const char *arg) {
unsigned int i, j;
memcpy(prevtags, seltags, sizeof seltags);
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:43:46AM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
Hoi community,
I feel the need for a image resize program that matches the
Unix and suckless philosophy.
Currently I'm using ImageMagick, which is just fine, if it is already
installed. But I was shocked, when I had to install
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:05:16PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Here are the most recent changes I did to the codebase today
(most stuff towards 5.0 is done now).
- DEFGEOM is replaced by a function updategeom(), and a function
pointer updategeom in each layout definition
- removed
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:50:56AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
that one cannot easily toggle back
hi,
as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
that one cannot easily toggle back and forth to the previous
layout. rather, one needs to cycle through all 4 layouts
right now, it seems. this is not so nice...
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:07:04PM +0200, Julien Barnier wrote:
Hi Joerg,
question: is their a chance to get a kind of `togglemonocle'
functionality into dwm without writing it myself? this would
seem a frequent demand: activate monocle for some time than
switch back to tiling (or
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:01:43AM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Jonny Gerold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a very simple question. I just upgraded to 4.8. And I would like
to know if there is a simple way to assign one workspace to be say tiled
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:07:55PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:56:58PM +0100, Giorgio Lando wrote:
Actually 4.7 has been for me feature complete and subjectively bug free.
In 4.8 there are new things for which I am unable to imagine a scenario
of use (both
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 08:20:00PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
I investigated further today and refactored a lot. First of all
I got rid of dozoom, I extended Layout to contain a Bool
isfloating flag as well, which roughly tells dwm that the
layout algorithm is floating (hence there are no
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 10:35:46PM +0100, Henrik Holst wrote:
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:40:22 +0100
From: Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] I like Dmenu a little simpler
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 11:56:53AM +0100, Antoni Grzyma??a wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:14:59 +0100, Enno Gottox Boland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is not be done by dmenu but by dmenu_path. This is a simple
Yes, dmenu is totally dumb in that respect, it just shows what you feed
to
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/7/08, Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was expecting that the selected entry is fed to `exec' or
whatever. simple question: what is supposed to happen and
how do I use `dmenu' sensibly?
have you edited
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:05:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
* Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080307 19:00]:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/7/08, Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was expecting that the selected entry is fed
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:00:49PM -0500, John S. Yates, Jr. wrote:
I have not looked at the code in a good while but wanted to suggest
the following code concept. My thought sprang from Anselm writing
I propose using setlayout([M]) and setlayout([]=)
and then later
I plan to
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:11:02PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
* Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080304 17:21]:
question 1: should
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:21:14PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:54:33PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:11:02PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 02:18:25PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:47:16PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/5/08, Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but that was not my point. sorry, if I have not been clear
enough: I really mean the old 'mod1-m
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:45:09PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/5/08, Jeremy O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a quick solution for maximizing floating windows?
an ugly solution would be a key binding for:
togglefloat()
monocle()
togglefloat()
tile()
but this way you
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 02:18:25PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:47:16PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/5/08, Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but that was not my point. sorry, if I have not been clear
enough: I really mean the old 'mod1-m
dear list,
consider the following scenario:
1. open at least two windows, e.g. xterms, in a previously
empty view. these appear in the standard tiling layout of
`dwm'.
2. maximize ('full screen') the window which currently has
the focus (main window or the other one).
3. set focus
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:51:30PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
* Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080304 17:21]:
question 1: should not the focused window be always brought
to the foreground irrespective of whether it is currently
maximized or not? it's even more irrating
work, I could do it properly, test,
and post a patch if you like.
Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
simple question:
there seems to be no pre-defined way to cycle forward/backward
through tag-groups (still essentially a.k.a. workspaces to
me, though I understand there's a difference). only
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 05:41:43AM -0500, Joseph Xu wrote:
Hi:
I have an annoying problem with xterm where it does not reflow my text
whenever I change the main window width. So say I have an xterm with
some text as the main window. If I shrink and then increase the main
window width, it
a lot so far. I'll keep this and test it when I find
the time (too busy right now) and let you know. if I read the
code right the cycling enacted by the modulo expression is exactly
what I mean.
thanks again,
joerg
Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
simple question:
there seems to be no pre
simple question:
there seems to be no pre-defined way to cycle forward/backward
through tag-groups (still essentially a.k.a. workspaces to
me, though I understand there's a difference). only mod1+[1..9] and
mod1+tab seem to be in place for navigation. from my experience
with `ion' I find the
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:40:07AM -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:46:47 +0100
Antoni Grzyma??a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:24:20 +0100, Amit Uttamchandani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. vim + encfs
2. Revelation - GTK app
3. pwsafe
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:43:42PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:48:12PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
hi,
I want to give `dwm' a serious try (used it only
sporadically on my labtop up to now). so far everything
seems to work except
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:50:15AM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:47:10AM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:43:42PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:48:12PM +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
hi,
I want
35 matches
Mail list logo
