Christian Garbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 12.01.2008 um 00:36:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:27:09PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 5:16 PM, Stefan Maerkl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the second head, one could display just an empty window labelled
On head 1. Maybe in a
Stefan Maerkl wrote:
Christian Garbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 12.01.2008 um 00:36:
The inactive head gets a static, perhaps greyed out version of the
window in question. The active head has the real window with focus,
input and output.
When you move your mouse to the inactive window or
Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
One problem with using a subset of your tags for a different
screen occures, if a window is tagged with a tag from one screen
and with another tag from a different screen. We cannot display
a window on two screens, at least not mirrored (Xinerama allows
to display portions
Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 11.01.2008 um 17:07:
pancake dixit (2008-01-11, 15:36):
maybe someone who is showing a window to another ppl on a external
monitor or projector not visible by the one who is working on the local
monitor.
This has been discussed on the list
On Jan 11, 2008 5:16 PM, Stefan Maerkl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the second head, one could display just an empty window labelled
On head 1. Maybe in a special colour or so.
You're joking, right?... Right?
Why not just keep it simple and store a seltags[] for each monitor and a single
variable indicating which is the current monitor selected?
This way you can achieve any of the possibilities (show the same client in both
monitors, move a window from one to another, etc..
For me this approach looks
pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This way you can achieve any of the possibilities (show the same client in
both
monitors, move a window from one to another, etc..
X doesn't give you a mechanism for showing the same client on both monitors.
Best wishes,
Chris.
Chris Webb dixit (2007-12-11, 13:11):
This way you can achieve any of the possibilities (show the same client in
both
monitors, move a window from one to another, etc..
X doesn't give you a mechanism for showing the same client on both monitors.
Ah, that solves my dilemma. I thought
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:10:14PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2007-12-09, 18:27):
[snip]
One idea I was playing in my mind with for a while was assigning some of
the tags to the other display and move between the displays seamlessly
as if moving between the
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2007-12-10, 10:18):
I think this discussion is going in the right direction. My suggestion
to marry those two contradicting views would be like this:
- in normal circumstances two heads act like two separate dwm instances
(the way I guess most people are doing
On Dec 10, 2007 4:11 AM, Chris 'Ducky' Chapin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is sort of what I've done. I run dwm at work with a 2 head xinerama
setup, so added a side attribute to the client struct and added a
function to toggle it. Then I just copied and adjusted the tile function
to
Hi there,
could you imagine that there is a way that dwm could be used in
a Xinerama environment and how that might look like?
Regardless if that is necessary or not for mainstream dwm,
I see the following possibilities:
- aim multihead setup (distinct bars, tag sets and layouts for
each
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:54:00PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
could you imagine that there is a way that dwm could be used in
a Xinerama environment and how that might look like?
Regardless if that is necessary or not for mainstream dwm,
I see the following possibilities:
- aim
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:59:21PM +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
A shared tagging setup, but a flag to indicate primary or secondary head.
Sort of like adding an extra dimension to dwm.
That sounds like a simple solution, but still very similiar to
aiming the multihead setup. But how to
On Dec 9, 2007 11:54 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you imagine that there is a way that dwm could be used in
a Xinerama environment and how that might look like?
[A collective groan goes around as people realise I'm still around :-) ]
Yes and
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 02:12:48PM +0100, Engin Tola wrote:
pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Recently I buyed a 20 16:10 tft, and i really feel interesting to have
xinerama with dwm. Thinking about that I got the idea that we should just
store two variables:
- selected tag for each
Seems like this would call for an alternative layout to be #included,
which allows for the large-resolution screen-spanning desktop, and it
could just emulate multihead by tiling / maximizing windows to those
sections of the desktop which are displayed on each screen. These
boundaries could be
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2007-12-09, 18:27):
[snip]
One idea I was playing in my mind with for a while was assigning some of
the tags to the other display and move between the displays seamlessly
as if moving between the tags - I guess I'll still have the problem of
not being able to move
18 matches
Mail list logo
