Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-05-14 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Hi any joy regarding this? Kind regards, Anselm On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:22:08AM -0300, Luiz Ribeiro wrote: Great idea! I'll work on it and post the source code later. On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Tuncer Ayaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Tuncer

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-29 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (29/04/08 11:27), Anselm R. Garbe wrote: To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org From: Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [dwm] Java patch User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org List-Id: dynamic window manager

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-29 Thread Tuncer Ayaz
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:43:14PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote: luizribeiro: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't work for me. Just tested with jdk 1.5.0 and

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-29 Thread Luiz Ribeiro
Great idea! I'll work on it and post the source code later. On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Tuncer Ayaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Tuncer Ayaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-29 Thread Don Stewart
arg: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:43:14PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote: luizribeiro: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't work for me. Just tested with jdk 1.5.0 and netbeans... I think the LG3D Java compatibility came with jdk 1.6. Remember

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Tuncer Ayaz
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Tuncer Ayaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2008-04-28, 10:57): No I'm not noticing any. I'm using hg 1122, though. Cool. What I'm missing right

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Tuncer Ayaz
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2008-04-27, 21:49): Btw, what about the Tk issues I read here IIRC a long time ago? Are there any problem with Tk 8.5? No I'm not noticing any. I'm using hg 1122, though. Cool. What I'm

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I have to fiddle with bh or something else to emulate BarOff. what's the correct way? DEFGEOM(nobar, 0, -bh, sw, 0, 0, sw, sh, wx, wy, mfact*ww, wh, mx+mw, wy,

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06): On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I have to fiddle with bh or something else to emulate BarOff. what's the correct way? DEFGEOM(nobar, 0, -bh, sw, 0, 0, sw,

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:21:36PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06): On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I have to fiddle with bh or something else to emulate

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Tuncer Ayaz
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:21:36PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06): On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Tuncer Ayaz
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06): On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I have to fiddle with bh or something else to

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 02:05:34PM -0300, Luiz wrote: I've made a simple hack (based on the xmonad one) to get Java applications (which use the XToolkit/XAWT backend) working. With this patch you won't get any grey windows anymore. The patch for dwm-4.9 is available here:

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-27 Thread Sander van Dijk
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this really work for everyone? I remember I evaluated a similiar solution last year without success. ;( If it does, I'm all for it, provided that it goes between some clear #ifdef UGLY_JAVA_HACK ... #endif or

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-27 Thread Luiz Ribeiro
It works for me (JRE 1.6.0u5). Anyone else tried it and can give any feedback? On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Sander van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this really work for everyone? I remember I evaluated a

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-27 Thread Jukka Salmi
Anselm R. Garbe -- dwm (2008-04-27 14:45:58 +0200): On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 02:05:34PM -0300, Luiz wrote: I've made a simple hack (based on the xmonad one) to get Java applications (which use the XToolkit/XAWT backend) working. With this patch you won't get any grey windows anymore.

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-27 Thread Luiz Ribeiro
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't work for me. Just tested with jdk 1.5.0 and netbeans... I think the LG3D Java compatibility came with jdk 1.6. Remember that the hack sets the NET_WM_NAME to LG3D. Maybe setting it to a different name could work

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-27 Thread Don Stewart
luizribeiro: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Salmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't work for me. Just tested with jdk 1.5.0 and netbeans... I think the LG3D Java compatibility came with jdk 1.6. Remember that the hack sets the NET_WM_NAME to LG3D. Maybe setting it to a different

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-27 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2008-04-27, 21:49): Btw, what about the Tk issues I read here IIRC a long time ago? Are there any problem with Tk 8.5? No I'm not noticing any. I'm using hg 1122, though. -- [a] signature.asc Description: Digital signature