On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Kurt H Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd much rather see status bar go away entirely and dwm use stdin and
stdout to communicate with an external app to handle tag status. I
don't think ewmh is the answer. I'd like to run dwm as dwm bar
so that anything
tuncer.ayaz:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:14:10AM +0200, Henrik Holst wrote:
I think an implementation of EWMH would make it possible to remove the
dwm panel (the one that reads stdin and displays it) from dwm code
tuncer.ayaz:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tuncer.ayaz:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:14:10AM +0200, Henrik Holst wrote:
I think an implementation of EWMH would make
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 07:57:44AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:14:10AM +0200, Henrik Holst wrote:
I think an implementation of EWMH would make it possible to remove the
dwm panel (the one
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:15:15PM +0200, pancake wrote:
what do you think about writing a tool for commandline to generate a
notify() event to the X. This way we can call it from any program
(irssi,
mutt, our own shellscripts) and notify the tag where they are.
it shouldnt be hard to do.
a dijkstra quote [1] i've just stumbled upon and would like to share:
The practice is pervaded by the reassuring illusion that programs are
just devices like any others, the only difference admitted being that
their manufacture might require a new type of craftsmen, viz.
programmers. From there
Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a dijkstra quote [1] i've just stumbled upon and would like to share:
The practice is pervaded by the reassuring illusion that programs are
just devices like any others, the only difference admitted being that
their manufacture might require a new type
Good evening.
Am Wed, 7 May 2008 14:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
schrieb mikshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I find it blindingly bizarre that programmers, who by definition
should be logical thinkers, could be even slightly influenced toward
thinking that lines of code are directly proportional to quality of
Right, I propose to get rid of snapping at all. Does anyone uses
snapping at all?
I do. But I actually think a far better solution to the get this
floating window to the edge of the screen easily is what yiyus(?) said
early on (or at least, what I think he meant). If you simply prevent a
John A. Grahor dixit (2008-05-07, 17:57):
Having to use the mouse a lot can suck, but following Fitts' Law makes
it suck /significantly/ less, in my opinion. It might seem like it'd be
bad to not be able to move a window partially off-screen, but I don't
think I've ever intentionally meant to
* Christoph Lohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-07 23:48:20 +0200]:
Good evening.
Am Wed, 7 May 2008 14:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
schrieb mikshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I find it blindingly bizarre that programmers, who by definition
should be logical thinkers, could be even slightly influenced toward
11 matches
Mail list logo
