[dwm] dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Hello, I recently switched from awesome to dwm which gives me my desktop back ;) I am currently using 5.4 from Mecurial. Two questions: - A `make clean install' does install dwm but it cannot read from stdin which prevents me from displaying time and date on the toolbar. config.h:15:

[dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:17 - > 2008/12/13 henry atting : >> - A `make clean install' does install dwm but it cannot read from stdin >> which prevents me from displaying time and date on the toolbar. >> >>config.h:15: warning: '

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - > 2008/12/13 henry atting : >>> 2008/12/13 henry atting : >>> The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume >>> it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4 >>

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - James Turner * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 18:43 - > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:09:11PM +0100, henry atting wrote: >> Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - >> >> > 2008/12/13 henry atting : >> >>> 2008/12/13 henry atting : >> >>>

[dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Brendan MacDonell * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 19:42 - > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM, henry atting > wrote: >> Patching works without problems but I get this warnings: >> >>dwm.c:1640: warning: 'viewnext' defined but not used >>dwm.c:1

[dwm] pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
I am looking for the pertag patch for 5.4. Is it available anywhere? Kind regards, henry

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
On Fr, Jan 02 2009, Valentin wrote: > Yes, it is. I updated it a couple of days ago, but for some reason arg > still hasn't put it one the wiki =P > You can get it here: > http://lists.suckless.org/dwm/0812/7209.html Very nice, thanks :) henry

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
Mmh, I must have got it wrong. I expected if I change the layout of one tag - let's say from tiled to bottomstack - it would not change the layout of all tags but only the current one. As far as I can see this is not what pertag does... henry

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
On Fr, Jan 02 2009, v4hn wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 06:12:45PM +0100, henry atting wrote: >> Mmh, I must have got it wrong. >> I expected if I change the layout of one tag - let's say from tiled to >> bottomstack - it would not change the layout of all tags b

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
On Fr, Jan 02 2009, v4hn wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:41:08PM +0100, henry atting wrote: >> Okay, I have three tags, suppose the layout of all is tiled. I switch to the >> third tag and change the layout to floating. As a result all three tags now >> have a floating

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-03 Thread henry atting
On Sa, Jan 03 2009, daniel fusser wrote: > 2009/1/3 henry atting > >> On Fr, Jan 02 2009, v4hn wrote: >> >> dwm.c:1743: error: redefinition of 'viewnext' >> dwm.c:1709: error: previous definition of 'viewnext' was here >> dwm.c:1760: er

[dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread henry atting
I recently switched from dwm to xmonad. I did not like the rigid constraint on a certain number of code lines. The resulting way of doing it with patches in my opinion is not very sincere. I needed only two - and they did not match. Though I do not know haskell at all I find it very simple to con