I have been looking into this kind of thing myself. What I found is
that getting an Atom nettop computer would be a significant downgrade
in performance (from my Pentium M). Both in performance and
power/Watt. Also, GMA900 on the EEEs is slow enough that rendering
webpages is not very smooth.
, Matthias-Christian Ott o...@mirix.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:21:41PM -0500, voltaic wrote:
Hey Matthias,
Hi,
That URL you mentioned has some simple typos in it. The page is not
publicly editable, so I thought I'd let you know. The things that
stick out at me right away
Hey Matthias,
That URL you mentioned has some simple typos in it. The page is not
publicly editable, so I thought I'd let you know. The things that
stick out at me right away are:
proof should be prove
Our project scopes focus on advanced should be ...focuses on advanced
projects who focus
I also like the no-border behavior from a clarity point of view. My
situation is similar to Julio's in that I also use a very bright color
for the focused border and a very dark gray for the unfocused border.
This makes it quick and easy to see when a client has focus. When
there is only one
of clients tagged under the selected tag(s).
-voltaic
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/8 Matthias-Christian Ott o...@mirix.org:
I think, this doesn't make much sense. My proposed conception of borderless
clients seems more reasonable and intuitive to me
It seems this idea was forgotten again, so I thought I would bring it
up once more. As DWM 5.4 is being finalized and there is discussion on
what to include in future versions, I'd love to see the
no-border-if-single-window behavior become mainstream.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Sunnan
, but if you're only playing fullscreen games this may be all
you need.
-voltaic
On 7/17/08, Alex Matviychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for a great WM. I've been using it for several months and it
has made me much more productive.
I have two small issues I have not been able to resolve
This also sounds like a Firefox bug that's been around for a while. I
noticed it happening with version 3.0 as well. One way to get around
the shaking/bouncing problem is to make sure there is at least one
bookmark in the bookmark toolbar folder.
See:
I agree. For me, the major distinction between DWM and the other
window managers has been the use of tags instead of workspaces.
I also don't like the idea of moving windows around columns. I think
the zoom function is a sufficient mode of manipulating windows
(between master/slave areas). I feel
I am having a little trouble with the Xpdf open dialog. When the dialog
window opens initially, everything looks normal. When I navigate into
directories that contain long filenames, the open dialog resizes itself to
accommodate this change. As the resizing happens a portion of the window
becomes
in any sense.
2) More realistically then, a fork, or perhaps a WMIII would be more
appropriate as this idea is really something that is fundamentally different
from DWM.
--voltaic
solution by just using DWM.
-voltaic
On 8/15/07, Amit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Guys,
I'm a very happy camper here at DWM. I've never been more productive!
Thanks to all the developers for such a wonderful job!
Anyways, I was looking at Quake style terminal emulators
(http://yakuake.uv.ro
Hello all,
There is a screenshot of the spiral tiling layout on the wiki:
http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/spiral
Does anyone know what web browser Jeroen Schot is using in that screenshot?
I emailed him about it, but my mail may have gotten lost in spam.
Thanks,
voltaic
Thanks a lot everyone. I installed links a few minutes ago and it looks
great. I've had some experience using elinks before, but I wasn't too
impressed with it. I'm sort of trying to get away from bloated web browsers.
I wish someone would revive dillo...
-voltaic
On 8/15/07, Jeroen Schot [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
