Re: [dwm] regex in rules?

2008-02-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:08:49AM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:50:25AM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: this is OT, but what I believe would be easy to add as a rule mechanism and useful from

[dwm] regex in rules?

2008-02-26 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Hi there I'd like to get rid of regexp matching in rules, any complains? Does anyone really uses them? Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] regex in rules?

2008-02-26 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-02-26, 22:17): I'd like to get rid of regexp matching in rules, any complains? Does anyone really uses them? I think I just use substring match. Will this be sufficient? Best, -- [a] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [dwm] regex in rules?

2008-02-26 Thread Henry Bubert
HI Anslem, i kind of use it but i could also make 3 rules out of the one regex-rule. trying to get some space for something else? :) On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there I'd like to get rid of regexp matching in rules, any complains? Does

Re: [dwm] regex in rules?

2008-02-26 Thread pancake
This was discussed some time ago. I think it's unnecessary. On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:28:15PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-02-26, 22:17): I'd like to get rid of regexp matching in rules, any complains? Does anyone really uses them? I think I just use

Re: [dwm] regex in rules?

2008-02-26 Thread Tuncer Ayaz
this is OT, but what I believe would be easy to add as a rule mechanism and useful from my current point of view is having floating and non-floating views/tags. does that make sense or would it roll over dwm's design principles like a 5 ton caterpillar?

Re: [dwm] regex in rules?

2008-02-26 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:50:25AM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: this is OT, but what I believe would be easy to add as a rule mechanism and useful from my current point of view is having floating and non-floating views/tags. does that make sense or would it roll over dwm's design principles

Re: [dwm] regex in rules?

2008-02-26 Thread Tuncer Ayaz
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:50:25AM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: this is OT, but what I believe would be easy to add as a rule mechanism and useful from my current point of view is having floating and non-floating