Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-05-14 Thread Preben Randhol
On Thu, 14 May 2009 21:17:19 +0200
Rickard Gustafsson rick...@allyourbase.se wrote:

 After trying the concept for about a week I find it very irritating as
 soon as you have more than three clients. It works if all you do with
 your computer is browsing and IRC. I think a better concept for a very
 minimalistic window manager would be some thing like 2wm.

or dwm

-- 
Preben Randhol
http://wee-free-lore.blogspot.com/




Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-05-05 Thread Rickard Gustafsson
I could not stop thinking of this concept since I read this post.
Mostley because I have fooled around with ratpoison a bit the last
weeks. So tonight I sat down and tried to realise some of the ideas
with dwm-5.5 as foundation. It is almost only cut'n'paste from the
source and removing some parts.

I have kept mwfac because I think i maybe nice to have a layout where
the screen is split into two sections (just realised I should have
kept zoom() then). Floating layout is still there because I think it
is nice to be able to handle floats and apps like gimp in a flexible
fashion.

Client numbering is a bit screwed up to. This because clients are
added to the list of clients in a fifo fashion and I have not figured
out how to change this behavior. Do I need to change booth attach and
attachstack?

And I hope I have not screwed up in some licensing manner.

Here it is I some one would like to check it out.
http://web.student.chalmers.se/~rickardg/mwm-0.0.tar.gz

Regards
Rickard Gustafsson

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Leandro Chescotta
leandro.chesco...@gmail.com wrote:
 minimal/minimum/monocle window manager, this come to my head today, when i
 meet antiwm http://sourceforge.net/projects/antiwm this is like dwm, but
 with no tags, no bottom bar, no layouts, more like ratpoison, the thing is
 that i tryed ratpoison and antiwm, and it lacks a couple of things, so, i
 see that suckless have wmii, stripping down there is dwm, and why not a
 smaller one like a suckless antiwm... mwm! :) this are the things i think
 mwm need...

 - no tags, only a list of opened windows, that you can cycle with one
 keybinding or Alt+number
 - no bottom bar, just the window list that you can show/hide
 - no layouts, only a monocle-like one, and a floating layer for
 mplayer/feh/gimp
 - lol, an arch linux AUR package with the config.h ready to customize the
 few font/colors/keybindings/apps

 maybe this is not worthy, but i like the idea, maybe you too, maybe is like
 getting dwm code and strip it down a little, only, maybe not...




Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-27 Thread Preben Randhol
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:44:18 -0300
Leandro Chescotta leandro.chesco...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, someone start this earlier,
 *Wra!thhttp://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24472in archlinux
 forums
 * here http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70902 hope the best
 to this project! :)
 
 actually it's name is Most Minimal Window Manager (MMWM) lol and it
 something in between dwm and antiwm, like antiwm with more features,
 like...

Minimalism can be attractive, but it isn't productive. Don't see any
need for derailing the dwm development to something more minimalistic.
But I can recommend The C Programming Language
http://www.amazon.co.uk/C-Programming-Language-2nd/dp/0131103628/ref=pd_sim_b_1
if you want to learn C programming.

Best wishes

Preben



Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-27 Thread Preben Randhol
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:11:50 +0200
Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com wrote:


 why would one post an url to a web shop when the book itself has more
 informative resource locators: an official website, publisher, author
 names, isbn number, common abbrev, wikipedia entry, google.. ?

Because you can find all the info you want from the link and go to
whatever bookshop you want and buy it. Besides you find reviews
there. You even know how the cover of the book looks like.

But here is the URL to wikipedia if you prefer that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_(programming_language)

Google sucks.

Preben



Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-27 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 4/27/09, Preben Randhol rand...@pvv.org wrote:
 On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:44:18 -0300
 Leandro Chescotta leandro.chesco...@gmail.com wrote:
 *Wra!thhttp://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24472in archlinux
 forums

 But I can recommend The C Programming Language
 http://www.amazon.co.uk/C-Programming-Language-2nd/dp/0131103628/ref=pd_sim_b_1

is this a new trend that people reference improper sources and discuss
topics in unrelated forums?

if the information has a clear and obvious source then why look for it
somewhere else..

why would one post ideas, questions,.. to some random web forum when
there is a dedicated mailing list (and irc channel) for the given
topic?

why would one post an url to a web shop when the book itself has more
informative resource locators: an official website, publisher, author
names, isbn number, common abbrev, wikipedia entry, google.. ?

maybe i shouldn't get annoyd by this..



Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-27 Thread hiro
 But here is the URL to wikipedia if you prefer that:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_(programming_language)

He probably means this page: http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/cbook/

But I guess his point was that you should have provided that standard
information (copied from above web page):

The C Programming Language, Second Edition
by Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie.
Prentice Hall, Inc., 1988.
ISBN 0-13-110362-8 (paperback), 0-13-110370-9 (hardback).

Forums are a disease, but they are successful, because people are
always glad about the neat, animated smiley's, there are proudly
occupied moderators, and a lot of cool features for the administrator
to play with. Mathml support, flash games and reading private messages
comes to mind. These people definitely have too much time, and
probably patience, and are thus more friendly to newbies. They almost
always like what they are doing and seldom get upset about their new
and only friends.
Does that make sense?



Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-27 Thread Preben Randhol
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:12:12 +0200
hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Forums are a disease, but they are successful, because people are
 always glad about the neat, animated smiley's, there are proudly
 occupied moderators, and a lot of cool features for the administrator
 to play with. Mathml support, flash games and reading private messages
 comes to mind. These people definitely have too much time, and
 probably patience, and are thus more friendly to newbies. They almost
 always like what they are doing and seldom get upset about their new
 and only friends.
 Does that make sense?

Sorry, I don't get the relevance.



Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-27 Thread hiro
I'm sorry, this was related to Szabolcs' comment:

why would one post ideas, questions,.. to some random web forum when
there is a dedicated mailing list (and irc channel) for the given
topic?

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Preben Randhol rand...@pvv.org wrote:
 On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:12:12 +0200
 hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Forums are a disease, but they are successful, because people are
 always glad about the neat, animated smiley's, there are proudly
 occupied moderators, and a lot of cool features for the administrator
 to play with. Mathml support, flash games and reading private messages
 comes to mind. These people definitely have too much time, and
 probably patience, and are thus more friendly to newbies. They almost
 always like what they are doing and seldom get upset about their new
 and only friends.
 Does that make sense?

 Sorry, I don't get the relevance.





Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-26 Thread yy
2009/4/26 Leandro Chescotta leandro.chesco...@gmail.com:
 - no tags, only a list of opened windows, that you can cycle with one
 keybinding or Alt+number
 - no bottom bar, just the window list that you can show/hide
 - no layouts, only a monocle-like one, and a floating layer for
 mplayer/feh/gimp
 - lol, an arch linux AUR package with the config.h ready to customize the
 few font/colors/keybindings/apps


you could just run dwm without the bar, with only one tag, and with
only the monocle layout.


-- 
- yiyus || JGL .



Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-26 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 04:11:25PM -0300, Leandro Chescotta wrote:
 minimal/minimum/monocle window manager, this come to my head today, when i
 meet antiwm http://sourceforge.net/projects/antiwm this is like dwm, but
 with no tags, no bottom bar, no layouts, more like ratpoison, the thing is
 that i tryed ratpoison and antiwm, and it lacks a couple of things, so, i
 see that suckless have wmii, stripping down there is dwm, and why not a
 smaller one like a suckless antiwm... mwm! :) this are the things i think
 mwm need...
 
 - no tags, only a list of opened windows, that you can cycle with one
 keybinding or Alt+number
 - no bottom bar, just the window list that you can show/hide
 - no layouts, only a monocle-like one, and a floating layer for
 mplayer/feh/gimp
 - lol, an arch linux AUR package with the config.h ready to customize the
 few font/colors/keybindings/apps
 
Despite the fact that dwm already supports this, I like the idea. It should
be quite usable on netbooks and other computers with small screen where
monocle is the only option.

 maybe this is not worthy, but i like the idea, maybe you too, maybe is like
 getting dwm code and strip it down a little, only, maybe not...

You could probably through away much of dwm's code then.

Let us know when you release mwm.

Regards,
Matthias-Christian



Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-26 Thread Leandro Chescotta
mmm yes i can, but i was thinking that maybe we can even strip even down dwm
code, i don't know a lot about programming (actually very little), so maybe
im not the chosen one to do this, i think that the idea is worth the
discussion at least


On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:32 PM, yy yiyu@gmail.com wrote:

 2009/4/26 Leandro Chescotta leandro.chesco...@gmail.com:
  - no tags, only a list of opened windows, that you can cycle with one
  keybinding or Alt+number
  - no bottom bar, just the window list that you can show/hide
  - no layouts, only a monocle-like one, and a floating layer for
  mplayer/feh/gimp
  - lol, an arch linux AUR package with the config.h ready to customize the
  few font/colors/keybindings/apps
 

 you could just run dwm without the bar, with only one tag, and with
 only the monocle layout.


 --
 - yiyus || JGL .




-- 

-
http://aleyscha.spaces.live.com/

El lugar mas peligroso de todos es el cielo... En el, cada pensamiento se
hace realidad... sea bueno o malo... creas tu paraiso o tu infierno


Re: [dwm] [idea] mwm - minimal/minimun/monocle window manager

2009-04-26 Thread Leandro Chescotta
Well, someone start this earlier,
*Wra!thhttp://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24472in archlinux
forums
* here http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70902 hope the best to this
project! :)

actually it's name is Most Minimal Window Manager (MMWM) lol and it
something in between dwm and antiwm, like antiwm with more features, like...

So far it has keys to:
- pop a new terminal
- kill selected window
- cycle through windows
- pop a launcher menu (using dmenu by default)
- show a list of windows (working, but needs some enhancement)

Configurable options:
- launcher menu to run
- terminal to run
- font
- window list fg/bg color/selected window fg color/
- screen padding(how much space to leave unmanaged on all sides of the
screen - you can see a 16 pixel gap on top of the screenie)
- window list position (one of the four corners)



On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Leandro Chescotta 
leandro.chesco...@gmail.com wrote:

 mmm yes i can, but i was thinking that maybe we can even strip even down
 dwm code, i don't know a lot about programming (actually very little), so
 maybe im not the chosen one to do this, i think that the idea is worth the
 discussion at least



 On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:32 PM, yy yiyu@gmail.com wrote:

 2009/4/26 Leandro Chescotta leandro.chesco...@gmail.com:
  - no tags, only a list of opened windows, that you can cycle with one
  keybinding or Alt+number
  - no bottom bar, just the window list that you can show/hide
  - no layouts, only a monocle-like one, and a floating layer for
  mplayer/feh/gimp
  - lol, an arch linux AUR package with the config.h ready to customize
 the
  few font/colors/keybindings/apps
 

 you could just run dwm without the bar, with only one tag, and with
 only the monocle layout.


 --
 - yiyus || JGL .




 --

 -
 http://aleyscha.spaces.live.com/

 El lugar mas peligroso de todos es el cielo... En el, cada pensamiento se
 hace realidad... sea bueno o malo... creas tu paraiso o tu infierno




-- 

-
http://aleyscha.spaces.live.com/

El lugar mas peligroso de todos es el cielo... En el, cada pensamiento se
hace realidad... sea bueno o malo... creas tu paraiso o tu infierno