Good idea Dave. I know they have done several already. Spanish I believe
has been done and Japanese was in the works. Not sure about other languages
but I will check with N7NG and NN1N.
Thanks Dave for your positive input.
Bernie, W3UR
Bernie McClenny, W3UR
Now more than ever - you need The
N7EF=20
=20
You forgot to mention it would cost more. Don't get me wrong I like QSL
cards. =20
=20
I've worked all countries and have them all confirmed on the current =
list.
If all of a sudden there was a new DXCC Country I would send for a
traditional paper QSL card to put one on the wall
Please join this new group for all type of info related to Ham Radio
Group home page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VU-CHAT
Group email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only,
By the way I suspect there are more contesters using LOTW that
actual DXers. I think the main reason for that is they are all using
Absolutely... contesters are more in touch with electronic submissions.
They're used to the process. On the other hand, I have 50 qsls from w3lpl -hi!
Any
How great would it be if I logged on to DXA, looking at my QSO's (greenies).
DXA asks if I want my QSO's uploaded to LOTW for (let's say) 1 dollar per QSO.
Enter your creditcard nr. etc.
Wim
Citeren Bernie McClenny, W3UR [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
N7EF=20
=20
You forgot to mention it
In relation to my previous post, I think if ARRL would periodically release
an official user list, it would provide incentive for cluster users to
chase dx that choose to qsl via LotW.
Yes, I hear the non-cluster types tearing me down for not finding them
the old fashioned way. I certainly
I'm not sure a list of over 18,000 certificates would be of much use.
I guess what I was getting at is that the text list of callsigns can now be
integrated into certain cluster user software that will let you know when
a call being spotted is a certificate holder.
But on second thought,
Hi folks,
Listening to KG44WW on 14118.6. What country is this?
Thanks,
WV2B"Nothinggreatiseverachievedwithoutenthusiasm."-RalphWaldoEmerson.
That
has to be a typo. I'm sure DJ1CW meant KG4WW down in
Guantanamo
73
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 3:01
PMTo: dx-chat@njdxa.orgSubject: [DX-CHAT]
KG44WW
Hi folks,
Nope... KG44WW down below the US SSB allocations I heard 'em too.
John K5MO
At 03:25 PM 3/25/2006, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
That has to be a typo. I'm sure DJ1CW meant KG4WW down in Guantanamo
73
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Yeah, I went and looked up all the spots for KG4... some are spotting him
with one 4, some with 2.
This is interesting. Assuming for the moment that he IS operating from
Guantanamo Bay, one wonders if he (KG4WW?) got permission from whomever it
is on the base that issues calls to add the extra
...along with the US stations who are calling him on freq (which at the
time, was well below the US phone section of the band!)
John K5MO
At 04:14 PM 3/25/2006, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
All I can say is... WFWL, and if this character is legit, he's going to have
some explaining to do
The number of US stations that operate outside our bands and subbands,
during any contest, always amazes me.
Apparently, there are those who do don't understand a thing about SSB or
CW bandwidth. Most hams consider single-sideband suppressed carrier to be
about 3 kHz wide. Which isn't
For what it's worth, I just heard him CQing and he specifically said >From Guantanamo Bay, so I guess that's where he is. As you said, WFWL.73, David, K2DBKOn 3/25/06,
Ron Notarius WN3VAW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I went and looked up all the spots for KG4... some are spotting himwith one 4,
Operations from Guantanamo (licensing and callsign assignment) are
under the jurisdiction of the military, not FCC.
Bob, N7XY
On Mar 25, 2006, at 11:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for the replies. I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing
something.
I have sent an
Strictly speaking, operations from Guantanamo Bay come
under the authority of the base commander and those he has delegated to -- ie
the US Military -- not the FCC. Therefore, if the KG44WW op has permission
to operate below the US band on 20, he's kosher. And further, those in the
US who
Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
Wonder how many Popkingrams this little fiasco will generate?
Aren't you dating yourself Ron?
Is Dave still around?
I remember him from the 50s and 60s in New York.
Larry
--
Larry Alkoff N2LA - Austin TX
Using Thunderbird on Slackware Linux
As far as I know he is... I got one from him about 3 -4 years ago or so.
Now if you're a stamp collector and want some vintage 1960's era stamps,
just stray near a band edge during a major contest (especially at the high
end of 20) and you'll hear from Dave!
73
-Original Message-
From:
Whats a little bending of the rules?
A simplex DX pile up is intentional QRM by all the callers, or (attempted) stealing of someones run frequency in a contest (if you transmit when you even think it might interfere with another transmission, thats Intentional_QRM...very illegal). Then
Now THAT is a very good question...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Bernie McClenny, W3UR
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 9:59 PM
To: 'Ron Notarius WN3VAW'; 'john'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] KG44WW
Are
Well,
I just got told (privately) by someone that claims to know, that since KG4WW is
the "licensing entity for GITMO," and that KG44WW is still considered a 2x2, the
operation is legal.
Whatever. Since I'm not privy to the details of
how the FCC allocates a call sign block to the
YES!
Bernie McClenny, W3UR wrote:
Are Guantanamo Bay stations allowed to transmit on SSB below 14150?
Bernie
Bernie McClenny, W3UR
Now more than ever - you need The Daily DX and The Weekly DX - to keep up
with the DX news from around the globe!
Editor of - The Daily DX -- two free
22 matches
Mail list logo
